KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Reforma / 2021 / Sayı: 91

HYSTERESIS IN UNEMPLOYMENT: KYRGYZSTAN CASE

Akak SHARSHENKADYROVA
Damira BAİGONUSHOVA
Dergi
Reforma
Sayfa
35–43
Yayın Tarihi
2021-10-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results obtained provide evidence that the hysteria hypothesis is valid for unemployment rates for the period 1999-2017 for Kyrgyzstan.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Hysteresis in economics occurs as a result of economic crises.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The mechanism called unemployment hysteria refers to the situation that the increasing unemployment rate that occurred during the economic shock does not return to its previous state (average even) after the effect of the economic shock disappears.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results obtained provide evidence that the hysteria hypothesis is valid for unemployment rates for the period 1999-2017 for Kyrgyzstan.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Hysteresis in economics occurs as a result of economic crises. The mechanism called unemployment hysteria refers to the situation that the increasing unemployment rate that occurred during the economic shock does not return to its previous state (average even) after the effect of the economic shock disappears. In 1986, O. Blanchard and L. Summers tried to explain unemployment hysteria with the help of the "Insiders and Outsiders" model. The purpose of this research is to test the validity of the unemployment hysteria hypothesis for Kyrgyzstan. For analysis quarterly data of unemployment rates for the period 1999-2017 were used. The validity of the hypothesis was tested with the help of the Zivot Andrews structural break unit root test and the Long Memory Unit Root Test. The results obtained provide evidence that the hysteria hypothesis is valid for unemployment rates for the period 1999-2017 for Kyrgyzstan.

Abstract

Hysteresis in economics occurs as a result of economic crises. The mechanism called unemployment hysteria refers to the situation that the increasing unemployment rate that occurred during the economic shock does not return to its previous state (average even) after the effect of the economic shock disappears. In 1986, O. Blanchard and L. Summers tried to explain unemployment hysteria with the help of the "Insiders and Outsiders" model. The purpose of this research is to test the validity of the unemployment hysteria hypothesis for Kyrgyzstan. For analysis quarterly data of unemployment rates for the period 1999-2017 were used. The validity of the hypothesis was tested with the help of the Zivot Andrews structural break unit root test and the Long Memory Unit Root Test. The results obtained provide evidence that the hysteria hypothesis is valid for unemployment rates for the period 1999-2017 for Kyrgyzstan.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SHARSHENKADYROVA, A., BAİGONUSHOVA, D. (2021). HYSTERESIS IN UNEMPLOYMENT: KYRGYZSTAN CASE. Reforma, Sayı: 91, 35–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/388004

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (4)

  1. Кашепов, А.В., Сулакшин, С.С., Малчинов, А.С. Рынок труда: проблемы и пути решения. – М.: Научный эксперт, 2008. Кучма, К., Кучма, О., Горбунова, О. Безработица: виды, причины и пути решения // Социально экономические явления и процессы. – 2015. – No 7. – С. 7-83. Кутукеев, Б.С. Безработица в Кыргызстане. Проблемы и пути их решений. – Режим доступа: http://arch.kyrlibnet.kg/uploads/NSU_KUTUKEEV1.pdf Кыргызстан: экономический рост, занятость и сокращение бедности. – Бишкек: МОТ, 2008. Марыганова, Е. А., Шарипо, С.А. Макроэкономика. Экспресс курс: учебное пособие. – М.: КНОРУС, 2010. – С. 302. Элмуратов, Ш.З., Балтабаев, А.Г. Безработица в Кыргызстане и в мире (анализ основного направления) // Известия вузов Кыргызстана. – Бишкек, 2016. – No 10. – С. 181-183. 7. Ahmet Tayfur Akcan. Türk Cumhuriyetlerinde İşsizlik Histerisi: Panel Veri Analizi Turkish Studies // Economics, Finance, Politics. – 2019. –Volume 14. Issue 3. – S. 623-637.
  2. Banerjee, A. and Urga, G. Modeling structural breaks, long memory and stock market volatility: An overview // Journal of Econometrics. – 2005. – No 129. – S. 1-34. David Gray. Persistent Regional Unemployment Differentials Revisited // Regional Studies. – 2004. – No 38:2. – P.167-176. 10. Eric Zivot and Donald W. K. Andrews // Journal of Business & Economic Statistics. – 1992. – Vol. 10. No. 3. – P.251-270.
  3. Evrim Turgutlu Fisher (2004). Fisher Hipotezinin Tutarlılığının Testi: Parçalı Durağanlık ve Parçalı Koentegrasyon Analizi // D.E.Ü.İ.İ.B.F. – Dergisi Cilt:19. Sayı:2. – S. 55-74. Fumitaka Furuoka. Unemployment hysteresis in Central Asia MPRA. Paper No. 60323, 2014. Hüseyin Çelik (). İşsizlik Histerisi Geçerliliğini Türkiye ve Komşu Ülkeleri İçin İncelenmes. // ASSAM Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi. – 2019. – Cilt: 6. Sayı: 15. – S. 38-48. Knut Roed. Unemployment Hysteresis - Macro Evidence from 16 OECD Countries Empirical Economics 21, 1996. – P. 589-600. Giorgio Brunello. Hysteresis and “The Japanese unemployment problem”: Preliminary investigation. Oxford Economic Papers 42, 1990. – P. 483-500. León-Ledesma, Miguel A. Unemployment Hysteresis in the US and the EU: a Panel Data Approach, Department of Economics Discussion Paper. – University of Kent, Department of Economics, Canterbury, 2000. – No. 0006. Luis A. Gil-Alana. Modelling the Persistence of Unemployment in Canada // International Review of Applied Economics. – 2002. – No 16:4. – Р. 465-477.
  4. Mikhaila O., Eberwein C. J. and Handac J. Estimating persistence in Canadian une