Dergiler / Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 43

Volatility Spillover between Bist 30 Futures and Spot Markets: A DCC-GARCH Analyses

VOLATILITY SPILLOVER BETWEEN BIST 30 FUTURES AND SPOT MARKETS: A DCC-GARCH ANALYSES

Sayfa
1–27
Yayın Tarihi
2022-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In addition, the effect of negative and positive shocks on market volatility was analyzed with the GJR-GARCH model and the results demonstrated that both markets responded strongly to negative shocks when compared to positive shocks.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Investors should be aware of the information flow across the markets to develop investment policies.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The volatility spillover relationships between spot and futures markets includes significant knowledge for the composition of optimal portfolios.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In addition, the effect of negative and positive shocks on market volatility was analyzed with the GJR-GARCH model and the results demonstrated that both markets responded strongly to negative shocks when compared to positive shocks.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2006 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Futures Market · Spot Markets · Volatility Spillover

Özet

Investors should be aware of the information flow across the markets to develop investment policies. The volatility spillover relationships between spot and futures markets includes significant knowledge for the composition of optimal portfolios. In the present study, the relationship between spot and futures markets in Turkey was investigated based on BIST 30 index end-of-day price data for the period between February 2, 2006, and April 30, 2020. The volatility spillover effects and the time-varying dynamic conditional relationships between the markets were investigated with the DCC-GARCH model. The findings reveal the existence of a two-way volatility spillover between markets and a strong dependency between markets’ return volatilities. In addition, the effect of negative and positive shocks on market volatility was analyzed with the GJR-GARCH model and the results demonstrated that both markets responded strongly to negative shocks when compared to positive shocks.

Abstract

In terms of investors, it is essential to be aware of the flow of information across markets and build up investment policies in line with this information. The volatility spillover relationships between futures and spot markets contain important information in the context of optimal portfolio composing. In this study, the relevant relationship between futures and spot markets in Turkey were investigated in the context of BIST 30 index, using the end-of-day pricing data for the period from 2 February 2006 to 30 April 2020. The volatility spillover effects and the time-varying dynamic conditional relationship between markets was investigated by DCC-GARCH method. The results indicate that there is a strong dependence between markets' return volatilities. Also a significant bidirectional relationship is found in volatility transmissions between the markets. The results of GJR-GARCH analysis, in order to examine the effect of negative and positive shocks on the markets' volatilities indicate that both markets responded more strongly to their negative shocks than to positive shocks. Findings generally indicate that there is a bidirectional causality relationship between price and volatility changes of the markets. This result supports the hypothesis that both markets play a role in volatility spillover.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KARA, E., ANBAR, A., ARABACI, Ö. (2022). Volatility Spillover between Bist 30 Futures and Spot Markets: A DCC-GARCH Analyses. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 43, 1–27. https://ajindex.com/articles/383372

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Bhamra, H. S. and Uppal, R. (2009). The Effect of Introducing a Non-Redundant Derivative on the Volatility of Stock-Market Returns When Agents Differ in Risk Aversion. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(6), 2303-2330.
  2. Bhar, R. (2001). Return and Volatility Dynamics in the Spot and Futures Markets in Australia: An Intervention Analysis in a Bivariate EGARCH-X Framework. Journal of Futures Markets, 21(9), 833-850.
  3. Bhaumik, S., Karanasos, M. and Kartsaklas, A. (2016). The Informative Role of Trading Volume in an Expanding Spot and Futures Market. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 35, 24-40.
  4. Black, F. (1976). Studies in Stock Price Volatility Changes. In Proceedings of the 1976 Meetings of the American Statistical Association, 171-181.
  5. Bodnar, T. and Hautsch, N. (2016). Dynamic Conditional Correlation Multiplicative Error Processes. Journal of Empirical Finance, 36, 41-67.
  6. Bohl, M. T., Diesteldorf, J. and Siklos, P. L. (2015). The Effect of Index Futures Trading on Volatility: Three Markets for Chinese Stocks. China Economic Review, Vol. 34. Bohl, M. T., Salm, C. A. and Schuppli, M. (2011). Price Discovery and Investor Structure in Stock Index Futures. The Journal of Futures Markets, 31(3), 282-306.
  7. Bollerslev, T. (1990). Modelling the Coherence in Short-Run Nominal Exchange Rates: A Multivariate Generalized ARCH Model. Review of Economics and Statistics, 72, 498-505.
  8. Bose, S. (2007). Understanding the Volatility Characteristics and Transmission Effects in the Indian Stock Index and Index Futures Market. ICRA Bulletin on Money & Finance, 139-162.
  9. Corredor, P., Ferrer, E and Santamaria, R. (2015). Sentiment-prone Investors and Volatility Dynamics between Spot and Futures Markets. International Review of Economics and Finance, 35, 180-196.
  10. Çelik, İ. (2012). Vadeli İşlem Piyasasında Fiyat Keşfi. Türkiye Bankalar Birliği, İstanbul.
  11. Chambers, N. (2009). Türev Piyasalar. Beta Yayınları, 3th Edition,
  12. Istanbul. Chance, D. M. and Brooks, R. (2013). An Introduction to Derivatives and Risk Management. 9th Edition,
  13. Cengage Learning, USA. Changa, C-L., McAleer, M. and Tansuchat, R. (2013). Conditional Correlations and Volatility Spillovers between Crude Oil and Stock Index Returns. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 25, 116-138.
  14. Chatrath, A., Christie-David, R., Dhanda, K. K. and Koch, T. W. (2002).
  15. Index Futures Leadership, Basis Behavior and Trader Selectivity. The Journal of Futures Markets, 22(7), 649-677.
  16. Chin, K., Chan, K. C. and Karolyi,