Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2018 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 4

Total tubeless ultra-mini supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A feasibility study

Sayfa
323–328
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Studies with a larger cohort may be required to finallyvalidate this technique.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for treating low-volume renal nephrolithiasisis being used as an alternative modality to the conventional PCNL.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:However its use in the supineposition has been scarcely reported.Material and methods: Patients who underwent ultra-mini PCNL in the supine position within the timeframe of January 2017 to July 2017 were studied.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Studies with a larger cohort may be required to finallyvalidate this technique.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: The ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for treating low-volume renal nephrolithiasisis being used as an alternative modality to the conventional PCNL. However its use in the supineposition has been scarcely reported.Material and methods: Patients who underwent ultra-mini PCNL in the supine position within the timeframe of January 2017 to July 2017 were studied. All these patients had this as their first-line treatment.The patients had calculus limited to either a single calyx or just extending to the pelvis and the stone sizewas less than 2 cm in its maximal dimension. An 8.5 Fr operating nephroscope was used. The patients werepositioned in the Galdakao modified Valdivia supine position. The stones were fragmented using Holmium-YAG laser. Various surgical outcomes including duration of the surgery, stone-free rate and any subsequentcomplications-if any-were analyzed.Results: The study includes a series of 14 patients with 15 renal units (one patient treated with bilateral renalstone disease). The mean age of the patients was 39.07 years and body mass index was 25.5 kg/m2. Intrarenalstone location was as follows: lower calyx, n=8; middle calyx, n=3, upper calyx, n=1, and pelvis, n=3. Medianoperative time was 52.66 min (range: 40-70) and the stone-free rate was 93.3%. Only one patient hadresidual fragments and needed subsequent extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.Conclusion: Ultra-mini PCNL in supine position with a complete tubeless approach for renal stone diseaseis a safe method for treating low-volume disease. Studies with a larger cohort may be required to finallyvalidate this technique.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GUPTA, S., DAS, S. K., PAL, D. K. (2018). Total tubeless ultra-mini supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A feasibility study. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 4, 323–328. https://ajindex.com/articles/379840

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (2)

  1. Campos-Salcedo J, Hernández-Martínez G, Terrazas-Ríos JL, Sedano- Lozano A, Castro-Marin M, López-Silvestre JC, et al. Usos y aplicacionesdelláser holmium en endourología. RevMex Urol 2012;72:41-6.
  2. Monga M, Best S, Venkatesh R, Ames C, Lee C, Kuskowski M, et al. Durability of flexible ureteroscopes: a randomized, prospective study. J Urol 2006;176:137-41. [Crossref] Preminger GM. Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy. Urol Res 2006;34:108-11. [Crossref] Cho SY, Choo MS, Jung JH, Jeong CW, Oh S, Lee SB, et al. Cumulative sum analysis for experiences of a single-session retrograde intrarenal stone surgery and analysis of predictors for stone free status. PLoS One 2014;9:e84878. Desai J, Zeng G, Zhao Z, Zhong W, Chen W, Wu W. A novel technique of ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Introduction and an initial experience for treatment of upper urinary calculi less than 2 cm. Biomed Res Int 2013;2013:490793. [Crossref] Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Seitz M, Sharma R, Stief CG, Desai M. The “all-seeing needle”: initial results of an optical puncture system confirming access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 2011;59:1054-9. [Crossref] De la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, Gutierrez J, Lingeman J, Scarpa R, et al. The clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global study: Indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol 2011; 25:11-7. [Crossref] Tefekli A, Karadag MA, Tepeler K, Sari E, Berberoglu Y, Baykal M, et al. Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified Clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol 2008; 53:184-90. [Crossref] Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 2007;51:899-906. [Crossref] Sabnis RB, Jagtap J, Mishra S, Desai M. Treating renal calculi 1-2 cm in diameter with minipercutaneous or retrograde intrarenal surgery: A prospective comparative study. BJU Int 2012;110:346- 9. [Crossref] Srisubat A, Potisat S, Lojanapiwat B, Setthawong V and Laopaiboon M. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009; CD007044. Bozkurt OF, Resorlu B, Yildiz Y, Can CE, Unsal A. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of lower-pol