Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2019 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2

Observational prospective study for surgical outcome and anesthetic feasibility of tubeless and totally tubeless supine PCNL: A single centre initial experience

Sayfa
146–149
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Four patients developed fever and 2 cases required one unit bloodtransfusion postoperatively.Conclusion: Tubeless and totally tubeless supine PCNL is technically feasible with good surgical outcomesand can be done under spinal and general anesthesia in properly selected patients.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: To evaluate surgical outcome and spinal anesthetic feasibility of supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) by tubeless and totally tubeless method.Material and methods: This observational study included a totally 53 patients.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Nephrostomy was not done using tubeless method, while in totally tubeless method instead of insertionof double j stent, ureteral catheterization was done and the ureter catheter was kept for <24 hours.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Four patients developed fever and 2 cases required one unit bloodtransfusion postoperatively.Conclusion: Tubeless and totally tubeless supine PCNL is technically feasible with good surgical outcomesand can be done under spinal and general anesthesia in properly selected patients.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: To evaluate surgical outcome and spinal anesthetic feasibility of supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) by tubeless and totally tubeless method.Material and methods: This observational study included a totally 53 patients. Initial diagnosis of renalstone was based on urinary ultrasonography, kidney, ureter and bladder X-ray, and later confirmed by computed tomography urography. PCNL was done with the patient in Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position. Nephrostomy was not done using tubeless method, while in totally tubeless method instead of insertionof double j stent, ureteral catheterization was done and the ureter catheter was kept for <24 hours. Duringpostprocedural period, patients were observed for development of fever, perinephric collection, need forblood transfusion and duration of hospital stay.Results: Patients aged between 14 and 75 years were included in the study. Out of totally 53 patients, supinetubeless PCNL was done in 23 patients while 30 were operated using totally tubeless method. Twenty-ninepatients were induced by spinal anesthesia and 24 by general anesthesia. Stone sizes were found to be inthe range of 1.4cm to 5.1 cm. Forty-six (86.7%) patients were managed by inferior calyceal puncture. Threepatients required double puncture in whom 2 had developed perinephric collection. Complete stone clearance achieved in 49 (92.4%) patients. Four patients developed fever and 2 cases required one unit bloodtransfusion postoperatively.Conclusion: Tubeless and totally tubeless supine PCNL is technically feasible with good surgical outcomesand can be done under spinal and general anesthesia in properly selected patients.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GUPTA, S., MAURYA, A. K., PAL, D. K. (2019). Observational prospective study for surgical outcome and anesthetic feasibility of tubeless and totally tubeless supine PCNL: A single centre initial experience. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2, 146–149. https://ajindex.com/articles/379739

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (2)

  1. Goodwin WE, Casey WC, Woolfe W. Percutaneous trocar (needle) nephrostomy in hydronephrosis. JAMA 1955;157:891-4. [CrossRef] Fernström I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1976;10:257-9. [CrossRef] Peces-Barba G, Rodríguez-Nieto MJ, Verbanck S, Paiva M, GonzálezMangado N. Lower pulmonary diffusing capacity in the prone vs. supine posture. J Appl Physiol 2004;96:1937-42. [CrossRef] Cheng MA, Todorov A, Tempelhoff R, McHugh T, Crowder CM, Lauryssen C. The effect of prone positioning on intraocular pressure in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2001;95:1351-5. [CrossRef] de la Rosette JJ, Tsakiris P, Ferrandino MN, Elsakka AM, Rioja J, Preminger GM. Beyond prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comprehensive review. Eur Urol 2008;54:1262-9. [CrossRef] Kerbl K, Clayman RV, Chandhoke PS, Urban DA, De Leo BC, Carbone JM. Percutaneous stone removal with the patient in a flank position. J Urol 1994;151:686-8. [CrossRef] Scarpa RM, Cossu FM, De Lisa A, Porru D, Usai E. Severe recurrent ureteral stricture: the combined use of an anterograde and retrograde approach in the prone split-leg position without X-rays. Eur Urol 1997;31:254-6. [CrossRef] Lehman T, Bagley DH. Reverse lithotomy: modified prone position for simultaneous nephroscopic and ureteroscopic procedures in women. Urology 1988;32:529-31. [CrossRef] Valdivia Uría JG, Valle Gerhold J, López López JA, Villarroya Rodriguez S, Ambroj Navarro C, Ramirez Fabián M, et al. Technique and complications of percutaneous nephroscopy: experience with 557 patients in the supine position. J Urol 1998;160:1975-8. [CrossRef] Ibarluzea G, Scoffone CM, Cracco CM, Poggio M, Porpiglia F, Terrone C, et al. Supine Valdivia and modified lithotomy position for simultaneous anterograde and retrograde endourological access. BJU Int 2007;100:233-6. [CrossRef] Falahatkar S, Moghaddam AA, Salehi M, Nikpour S, Esmaili F, Khaki N. Complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotripsy comparison with the prone standard technique. J Endourol 2008;22:2513- 7. [CrossRef] Rana AM, Bhojwani JP, Junejo NN, Das Bhagiam S. Tubeless PCNL with patient in supine position: procedure for all seasons?-- with comprehensive technique. Urology 2008;71:581-5. [CrossRef] Falahatkar S, Farzan A, Allahkhah A. Is complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotripsy feasible in all patients? Urol Res 2011;39:99-104.
  2. Falahatkar S, Allahkhah A. Recent developments in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: benefits o