Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2015 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 4

The use of non-contrast computed tomography and color Doppler ultrasound in the characterization of urinary stones - preliminary results

Sayfa
165–170
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: In case the density value of the stone is measured below 780 HU and grade 3 artifact intensity is determined, it can be inferred that the mineral composition of the stone tends to be cystine

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: To investigate the role of density value in computed tomography (CT) and twinkling artifact observed in color Doppler analysis for the prediction of the mineral composition of urinary stones.Material and methods: A total of 42 patients who were operated via percutaneous or endoscopic means and had undergone abdominal non-contrast CT and color Doppler ultrasonography examinations were included in the study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:X-ray diffraction method was utilized to analyze a total of 86 stones, and the correlations between calculated density values and twinkling intensities with stone types were investigated for each stone.Results: Analyses of extracted stones revealed the presence of 40 calcium oxalate monohydrate, 12 calcium oxalate dihydrate, 9 uric acid, 11 calcium phosphate, and 14 cystine stones.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: In case the density value of the stone is measured below 780 HU and grade 3 artifact intensity is determined, it can be inferred that the mineral composition of the stone tends to be cystine
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: To investigate the role of density value in computed tomography (CT) and twinkling artifact observed in color Doppler analysis for the prediction of the mineral composition of urinary stones.Material and methods: A total of 42 patients who were operated via percutaneous or endoscopic means and had undergone abdominal non-contrast CT and color Doppler ultrasonography examinations were included in the study. X-ray diffraction method was utilized to analyze a total of 86 stones, and the correlations between calculated density values and twinkling intensities with stone types were investigated for each stone.Results: Analyses of extracted stones revealed the presence of 40 calcium oxalate monohydrate, 12 calcium oxalate dihydrate, 9 uric acid, 11 calcium phosphate, and 14 cystine stones. The density values were calculated as 1499±269 Hounsfield Units (HU) for calcium oxalate monohydrate, 1505±221 HU for calcium oxalate dihydrate, 348±67 HU for uric acid, 1106±219 HU for calcium phosphate, and 563±115 HU for cystine stones. The artifact intensities were determined as grade 0 in 15, grade 1 in 32, grade 2 in 24, and grade 3 in 15 stones. Conclusion: In case the density value of the stone is measured below 780 HU and grade 3 artifact intensity is determined, it can be inferred that the mineral composition of the stone tends to be cystine

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BULAKÇI, M., TEFİK, T., AKBULUT, F., ÖRMECİ, M. T., BEŞE, C., ŞANLI, M. Ö., OKTAR, T. M., SALMASLIOĞLU, A. (2015). The use of non-contrast computed tomography and color Doppler ultrasound in the characterization of urinary stones - preliminary results. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 4, 165–170. https://ajindex.com/articles/379769

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Bartoletti R, Cai T, Mondaini N, Melone F, Travaglini F, Carini M, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors in urolithiasis. Urol Int 2007
  2. 79(Suppl 1): 3-7. [CrossRef] 2. Hassani H, Raynal G, Spie R, Daudon M, Vallée JN. Imaging-based assessment of the mineral composition of urinary stones: an in vitro study of the combination of hounsfield unit measurement in noncontrast helical computerized tomography and the twinkling artifact in color Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2012
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Bellin MF, Renard-Penna R, Conort P, Bissery A, Meric JB, Daudon M, et al. Helical CT evaluation of the chemical composition of urinary tract calculi with a discriminant analysis of CT-attenuation values and density. Eur Radiol 2004
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Chelfouh N, Grenier N, Higueret D, Trillaud H, Levantal O, Pariente JL, et al. Characterization of urinary calculi: In vitro study of ‘’twinkling artifact’’ revealed by color-flow sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Primak AN, Fletcher JG, Vrtiska TJ, Dzyubak OP, Lieske JC, Jackson ME, et al. Noninvasive differentiation of uric acid versus non-uric acid kidney stones using dual-energy CT. Acad Radiol 2007
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Gücük A, Uyetürk U. Usefulness of hounsfield unit and density in the assessment and treatment of urinary stones. World J Nephrol 2014
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Mitcheson HD, Zamenhof RG, Bankoff MS, Prien EL. Determination of the chemical composition of urinary calculi by computerized tomography. J Urol 1983
  8. Hillman BJ, Drach GW, Tracey P, Gaines JA. Computed tomographic analysis of renal calculi. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Newhouse JH, Prien EL, Amis ES Jr, Dretler SP, Pfister RC. Computed tomographic analysis of urinary calculi. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Mostafavi MR, Ernst RD, Saltzman B. Accurate determination of chemical composition of urinary calculi by spiral computerized tomography. J Urol 1998
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Motley G, Dalrymple N, Keesling C, Fischer J, Harmon W. Hounsfield unit density in the determination of urinary stone composition. Urology 2001
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Nakada SY, Hoff DG, Attai S, Heisey D, Blankenbaker D, Pozniak M. Determination of stone composition by noncontrast spiral computed tomography in the clinical setting. Urology 2000
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Spettel S, Shah P, Sekhar K, Herr A, White MD. Using Hounsfield unit me