KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Surgery / 2018 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 1

Randomized prospective comparison of long-term results of onlay and sublay mesh repair techniques for incisional hernia

BARIŞ SEVİNÇ
Ahmet OKUŞ
ABDÜLHALİM SERDEN AY
Nergis AKSOY
ÖMER KARAHAN
Sayfa
17–20
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Both techniques have similar recurrence rates.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Incisional hernia is a significant problem after laparotomy, and there is still no consensus on an idealtreatment method.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The aim of this study was to compare the results of onlay and sublay mesh repair techniques.Material and Methods: In this randomized prospective trial, 100 patients were divided into two groups: onlay andsublay groups.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Both techniques have similar recurrence rates.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: Incisional hernia is a significant problem after laparotomy, and there is still no consensus on an idealtreatment method. The aim of this study was to compare the results of onlay and sublay mesh repair techniques.Material and Methods: In this randomized prospective trial, 100 patients were divided into two groups: onlay andsublay groups. Recurrences were evaluated by performing a physical examination.Results: The median follow-up was 37.1 (26.6 to 46.5) months. In the onlay group, the mean operation time wassignificantly shorter. However, in terms of postoperative pain and wound complications, the sublay group had significantlybetter results. The recurrence rates were found to be similar in both groups (6% in the onlay group and2% in the sublay group).Conclusion: In the treatment of incisional hernia, sublay mesh repair is superior to onlay mesh repair in terms ofpostoperative pain and wound complications. Both techniques have similar recurrence rates.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SEVİNÇ, B., OKUŞ, A., AY, A. S., AKSOY, N., KARAHAN, Ö. (2018). Randomized prospective comparison of long-term results of onlay and sublay mesh repair techniques for incisional hernia. Turkish Journal of Surgery, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 1, 17–20. https://ajindex.com/articles/376607

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K. Hernias: inguinal and incisional. Lancet 2003
  2. [CrossRef] Mudge M, Hughes LE. Incisional hernia: a 10 year prospective study of incidence and attitudes. Br J Surg 1985
  3. [CrossRef] Burger J, van ‘tRiet M, Jeekel J. Abdominal incisions: techniques and postoperative complications. Scand J Surg 2003
  4. [CrossRef] Kurzer M, Kark A, Selouk S, Belsham P. Open mesh repair of incisional hernia using a sublay technique: long-term follow up. World J Surg 2008
  5. [CrossRef] Burger JW, Liujendijk RW, Hop WC Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EG, Jeekel J. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 2004
  6. [CrossRef] Cassar K, Munro A. Surgical treatment of incisional hernia. Br J Surg 2002
  7. [CrossRef] Luijendjik R, Hop WCJ, van den Tol P, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, IJzermans JN. A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 2000
  8. [CrossRef] Paul A, Korenkov M, Peters S. Unacceptable results of the Mayo procedure for repair of abdominal incisional hernias. Eur J Surg 1998
  9. [CrossRef] Israelson LA, Smedberg S, Montgomery A, Nordin P, Spangen L. Incisional hernia repair in Sweden 2002. Hernia 2006
  10. [CrossRef] Korenkov M, Paul A, Sauerland E, Neugebauer E, Arndt M, Chevrel JP, et al. Classification and surgical treatment of incisional hernia: results of an expert’s meeting. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2001
  11. [CrossRef] De Vries Reilingh TS, van Geldere D, Langenhorst B, de Jong D, van der Wilt GJ, vanGoor H, et al. Repair of large midline incisional hernias with polypropylene mesh: comparison of three operative techniques. Hernia 2004
  12. [CrossRef] Langer C, Schaper A, Liersch T, Kulle B, Flosman M, Füzesi L, et al. Prognosis factors in incisional hernia surgery: 25 years of experience. Hernia 2005
  13. [CrossRef] Kokotovic D, Gögenur I, Helgstrand F. Substantial variation among hernia experts in the decision for treatment of patients with incisional hernia: a descriptive study on agreement. Hernia 2017
  14. [CrossRef] Sauerland S, Schmedt CG, Lein S, Leibl BJ, Reinhard Bittner R. Primary incisional hernia repair with or without polypropylene mesh: a report on 384 patients with 5-year follow-up. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2005
  15. [CrossRef] Basoglu M, Yildirgan MI, Yilmaz I, Balik A, Celebi F, Atamanalp SS, et a