Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Surgery / 2018 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 1

Objectively structured verbal examination to assess surgical clerkship education: An evaluation of students’ perception

Sayfa
9–12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This feedback reflects that objectively structured verbalexamination merits further development and enhancement.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The objectivity and reliability of examining methods are controversial.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The students’ perception of objectively structured verbalexamination was assessed by their responses to a questionnaire.Results: Forty-two of 58 students returned filled questionnaires.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This feedback reflects that objectively structured verbalexamination merits further development and enhancement.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: The objectivity and reliability of examining methods are controversial. We subjected fourth-year medicalstudents to a specially designed verbal exam which we called objectively structured verbal examination. We aimedto evaluate feedback from students about objectively structured verbal examination as an assessment instrumentfor gauging their surgical knowledge.Material and Methods: Objectively structured verbal examination modules were developed according to the learninggoals of the surgical clerkship. Upon finishing surgery rotation, the students were subjected to objectively structuredverbal examination as part of their final evaluation. The students’ perception of objectively structured verbalexamination was assessed by their responses to a questionnaire.Results: Forty-two of 58 students returned filled questionnaires. Objectively structured verbal examination was acceptedby 72% of the students as an objective tool, and 86% of them found it enabled unbiased evaluation. Overall,most students expressed positive feedback regarding objectively structured verbal examination.Conclusion: The feedback received from students showed that objectively structured verbal examination is a reliableand objective method to assess their knowledge. This feedback reflects that objectively structured verbalexamination merits further development and enhancement.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DÜZGÜN, Ş. A., ZEREN, S., BAYHAN, Z. (2018). Objectively structured verbal examination to assess surgical clerkship education: An evaluation of students’ perception. Turkish Journal of Surgery, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 1, 9–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/376606

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (2)

  1. Goldstein EA, Maestas RR, Fryer-Edwards K, Wenrich MD, Oelschlager AM, Baernstein A, et al. Professionalism in medical education: an institutional challenge. Acad Med 2006; 81: 871-876. [CrossRef] Norman G. Fifty years of medical education research: waves of migration. Med Educ 2011; 45: 785-791. [CrossRef] Larsen DP, Butler AC, Roediger HL 3rd. Test-enhanced learning in medical education. Med Educ 2008; 42: 959-966. [CrossRef] Elstein AS. Analytic methods and medical education. Problems and prospects. Med Decis Making 1983; 3: 279-284. [CrossRef] Schuwirth L, Cantillon P. The need for outcome measures in medical education. BMJ 2005; 331: 977-978. [CrossRef] van der Vleuten C. Improving medical education. BMJ 1993; 306: 284-285. [CrossRef] Monroe KS. The relationship between assessment methods and self-directed learning readiness in medical education. Int J Med Educ 2016; 7: 75-80. [CrossRef] Dijksterhuis MG, Schuwirth LW, Braat DD, Teunissen PW, Scheele F. A qualitative study on trainees’ and supervisors’ perceptions of assessment for learning in postgraduate medical education. Med Teach 2013; 35: 396-402. [CrossRef] Patricio MF, Juliao M, Fareleira F, Carneiro AV. Is the OSCE a feasible tool to assess competencies in undergraduate medical education? Med Teach 2013; 35: 503-514. [CrossRef] Harden RM. Evolution or revolution and the future of medical education: replacing the oak tree. Med Teach 2000; 22: 435-442. [CrossRef] Petrusa ER. Structuring clinical medical education: a problem specific, performance based framework. Annu Conf Res Med Educ 1981; 20: 175-180.
  2. De Champlain AF, Cuddy MM, Scoles PV, Brown M, Swanson DB, Holtzman K, et al. Progress testing in clinical science education: results of a pilot project between the National Board of Medical Examiners and a US Medical School. Med Teach 2010; 32: 503-508. [CrossRef] Carney PA, Palmer RT, Fuqua Miller M, Thayer EK, Estroff SE, Litzelman DK, et al. Tools to Assess Behavioral and Social Science Competencies in Medical Education: A Systematic Review. Acad Med 2016; 91: 730-742. [CrossRef]