Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Surgery / 2017 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3

Colonoscopic perforations: Single center experience and review of the literature

Sayfa
195–199
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Age, co-morbidities, the location and size of the perforation, and the time interval between onset and diagnosis should be evaluated, and the treatment approach should be planned accordingly.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Iatrogenic colonic perforation is a well-known complication that can increase mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing colonoscopy.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Closer follow-up and a well-planned treatment strategy are required when perforation arises as a complication.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Age, co-morbidities, the location and size of the perforation, and the time interval between onset and diagnosis should be evaluated, and the treatment approach should be planned accordingly.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2005 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: Iatrogenic colonic perforation is a well-known complication that can increase mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Closer follow-up and a well-planned treatment strategy are required when perforation arises as a complication. The aims of this study are to (1) report our experience with a large colonoscopy series; (2) evaluate the underlying mechanisms of iatrogenic colonic perforation; (3) discuss the ideal period between onset and treatment; and (4) review the current literature regarding the management of iatrogenic colonic perforations. Material and Methods: Patients who underwent colonoscopy between January 2005 and May 2015 at a single center were reviewed retrospectively. Procedures during which colonic perforations occurred were documented and analyzed.Results: Between January 2005 and May 2015, 31,655 patients underwent colonoscopy and 5,214 patients underwent recto-sigmoidoscopy at our center. Thirteen of these procedures were associated with perforation. The perforation rate was found to be 0.041%. The most frequent locations of perforation were (a) the rectosigmoid junction, (b) the proximal rectum, and (c) the sigmoid colon. Management included surgical treatment in 11 patients and conservative management in 2 patients. Twelve patients (92.31%) were discharged uneventfully, and death occurred in one (7.69%) patient. Conclusion: Although they are rarely encountered, colonic perforations are serious complications of colonoscopy. A high index of clinical suspicion is required for early diagnosis and appropriate treatment. Age, co-morbidities, the location and size of the perforation, and the time interval between onset and diagnosis should be evaluated, and the treatment approach should be planned accordingly.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇOLAK, Ş., GÜRBULAK, B., BEKTAŞ, H., ÇAKAR, E., DÜZKÖYLÜ, Y., BAYRAK, S., GÜNEYİ, A. (2017). Colonoscopic perforations: Single center experience and review of the literature. Turkish Journal of Surgery, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3, 195–199. https://ajindex.com/articles/376565

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Korman LY, Overholt BF, Box T, Winker CK. Perforation during colonoscopy in endoscopic ambulatory surgical centers. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 554-557. [CrossRef] 2. Pérez Roldán F, González Carro P, Legaz Huidobro ML, Villafá-ez García MC, Soto Fernández S, de Pedro Esteban A, et al. Endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2004; 96: 36-47. [CrossRef] 3. Dafnis G, Ekbom A, Pahlman L, Blomqvist P. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy within a defined population in Sweden. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 302-309. [CrossRef] 4. Kavic SM, Basson MD. Complications of endoscopy. Am J Surg 2001; 181: 319-332. [CrossRef] 5. Kang HY, Kang HW, Kim SG, Kim JS, Park KJ, Jung HC, et al. Incidence and management of colonoscopic perfo- rations in Korea. Digestion 2008; 78: 218-223. [CrossRef] 6. Anderson ML, Pasha TM, Leighton JA. Endoscopic perforation of the colon: lessons from a 10-year study. Am J Gastro- enterol 2000; 95: 3418-3422. [CrossRef] 7. Wullstein C, Koppen M, Gross E. Laparoscopic treatment of colonic perforations related to colonoscopy. Surg Endosc 1999; 13: 198 484-487. [CrossRef] 8. Lüning TH, Keemers-Gels ME, Barendregt WB, Tan AC, Rosman C. Colonoscopic perforations: areview of 30.366 patients. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 994-997. [CrossRef] 9. Rex DK, Lewis BS, Waye JD. Colonoscopy and endoscopic therapy for delayed postpolypectomy hemorrhage. Gastrointest Endosc 1992; 38: 127-129. [CrossRef] 10. Teoh AY, Poon CM, Lee JF, Leong HT, Ng SS, Sung JJ, et al. Outcomes and predictors of mortality and stoma formation in surgical management of colonoscopic perforations: a multicenter review. Arch Surg. 2009; 144: 9-13. [CrossRef] 11. Iqbal CW, Cullinane DC, Schiller HJ, Sawyer MD, Zietlow SP, Farley DR. Surgical management and outcomes of 165 colonoscopic perforations from a single institution. Arch Surg. 2008; 143: 701-706. Discussion 706-707. 12. Rabeneck L, Paszat LF, Hilsden RJ, Saskin R, Leddin D, Grunfeld E, et al. Bleeding and perforation after outpatient colonoscopy and their risk factors in usual clinical practice. Gastroenterology. 2008; 135: 1899-1906. [CrossRef] 13. Miranda L, Settembre A, Piccolboni D, Capasso P, Corcione F. Iatrogenic colonic perforation: repair using laparoscopic technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2011; 21: 170-174. [CrossRef] 14. Lee SH, Choi GS, Lee JH. Laparoscopic treatment of colonic injury caused by colonoscopy. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 2004; 20: 257-262. 15. Rothol