Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Orthodontics / 2018 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3

Analysis of Six Orthodontic Journals in Science Citation Index and Science Citation Index Expanded: A Bibliometric Analysis

Sayfa
73–78
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In the first andsecond intervals, the European Union was the most common origin among articles accepted by the journals listed in SCI (30.1% and29.2% respectively), whereas Asia/Oceania was the common origin among articles accepted by the journals listed in SCIE (44.1% and43.4%, respectively).Conclusion: The articles published in the orthodontics journals listed under SCI and SCIE for 2006-2010 and 2011-2015 were signifi-cantly different in terms of numbers and characteristics.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: To analyze the article type, origin, main affiliation, number of publications, authors, and affiliations of six orthodonticjournals during two intervals of 5 years each (2006-2010 and 2011-2015).Methods: In total, 4879 articles examined in this study were screened online at the individual journal’s website.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Parameters were tested using the Pearson chi-square forindependence at a 0.05 level of significance.Results: Among all the article types, research articles were the most published in the orthodontic journals indexed by SCI and SCIE inthe first (2006-2010; 88.1% and 77.6%, respectively) and second periods (2011-2015; 84.4% and 74.6%, respectively).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In the first andsecond intervals, the European Union was the most common origin among articles accepted by the journals listed in SCI (30.1% and29.2% respectively), whereas Asia/Oceania was the common origin among articles accepted by the journals listed in SCIE (44.1% and43.4%, respectively).Conclusion: The articles published in the orthodontics journals listed under SCI and SCIE for 2006-2010 and 2011-2015 were signifi-cantly different in terms of numbers and characteristics.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2006-2010 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: To analyze the article type, origin, main affiliation, number of publications, authors, and affiliations of six orthodonticjournals during two intervals of 5 years each (2006-2010 and 2011-2015).Methods: In total, 4879 articles examined in this study were screened online at the individual journal’s website. The types of articlesand their authorship characteristics in the six orthodontic journals [three journals indexed by Science Citation Index (SCI) and theothers indexed by Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)] were recorded. Parameters were tested using the Pearson chi-square forindependence at a 0.05 level of significance.Results: Among all the article types, research articles were the most published in the orthodontic journals indexed by SCI and SCIE inthe first (2006-2010; 88.1% and 77.6%, respectively) and second periods (2011-2015; 84.4% and 74.6%, respectively). In the first andsecond intervals, the European Union was the most common origin among articles accepted by the journals listed in SCI (30.1% and29.2% respectively), whereas Asia/Oceania was the common origin among articles accepted by the journals listed in SCIE (44.1% and43.4%, respectively).Conclusion: The articles published in the orthodontics journals listed under SCI and SCIE for 2006-2010 and 2011-2015 were signifi-cantly different in terms of numbers and characteristics.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ZORTUK, F. B., KÜÇÜK, E. B., SÖZER, Ö. A., ÜNÜVAR, Y. A., KAYA, A., KAPTAÇ, M. (2018). Analysis of Six Orthodontic Journals in Science Citation Index and Science Citation Index Expanded: A Bibliometric Analysis. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3, 73–78. https://ajindex.com/articles/375098

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (4)

  1. hompson DR, Clark AM. Measuring research success via bibliomet- rics: where they fit and how they help and hinder. J Adv Nurs 2015; 71: 2699-701. [CrossRef] Yang S, Needleman H, Niederman R. A bibliometric analysis of the pediatric dental literature in MEDLINE. Pediatr Dent 2001; 23: 415-8.
  2. Kim MY, Lin J, White R, Niederman R. Benchmarking the endodontic literature on MEDLINE. J Endod 2001; 27: 470-3. [CrossRef] Mavropoulos A, Kiliaridis S. Orthodontic literature: an overview of the last 2 decades. Am J Orthod 2003; 124: 30-40. [CrossRef] Baumgartner S, Pandis N, Eliades T. Exploring the publications in three major orthodontic journals: a comparative analysis of two 5-year periods. Angle Orthod 2013; 84: 397-403. [CrossRef] Eliades T, Athanasiou AE. Impact Factor A Review with Specific Rel- evance to Orthodontic Journals. J Orofac Orthop 2001; 62: 74-83. [CrossRef] Harrison JE, Ashby D, Lennon M. An analysis of papers published in the British and European Journals of Orthodontics. Br J Orthod 1996; 23: 203-9. [CrossRef] Kanavakis G, Spinos P, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T, Papadopou- los MA, Athanasiou AE. Orthodontic journals with impact factors in perspective: trends in the types of articles and authorship charac- teristics. Am J Orthod 2006; 130: 516-22. [CrossRef] Luther F. A review of some orthodontic journals. J Orthod 2000; 27: 79-82. [CrossRef] Glänzel W, Schoepflin U. A bibliometric study on ageing and re- ception processes of scientific literature. J Inf Sci 1995; 21: 37-53. [CrossRef] Tsai Y-L, Lee C-C, Chen S-C, Yen Z-S. Top-cited articles in emergency medicine. Am J Emerg Med 2006; 24: 647-54. [CrossRef] Falkai P. What was new, interesting and frequently cited in 2009? Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2010; 260: 87-9. [CrossRef] Madhan M, Arunachalam S. Highly cited papers from India and Chi- na. Curr Sci 2010; 99: 738-49.
  3. Sun RL, Conway S, Zawaideh S, Niederman R. Benchmarking the clinical orthodontic evidence on Medline. Angle Orthod 2000; 70: 464-70.
  4. Primo NA, Gazzola VB, Primo BT, Tovo MF, Faraco Junior IM. Biblio- metric analysis of scientific articles published in Brazilian and inter- national orthodontic journals over a 10-year period. Dental Press J Orthod 2014; 19: 56-65. [CrossRef] Gibson R, Harrison J. What are we reading? An analysis of the or- thodontic literature 1999 to 2008. Am J Orthod 2011; 139: 471-84. [CrossRef] Gibson RM, Harrison JE. What are we reading now? An update on the papers published in the orthodontic literature