Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Orthodontics / 2016 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

Do Different Orthodontic Malocclusions Affect Patients’ Self-Concept and Psychosocial Status?

Sayfa
27–30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

No significant differences were found between the levels of social phobia and loneliness among groups (p>0.05).Conclusion: Our findings demonstrated that different malocclusions do not affect patients’ self-concept and psychosocial well-being

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the self-concept and psychosocial status measured by the levels of social phobia and loneliness in a sample of adolescent patients with different malocclusions and to explain the relationships, if any, between malocclusions.Methods: This study was performed on 90 (41 females and 49 males) orthodontic patients with a mean age of 13.52±1.81 years.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The self-concept, social phobia, and loneliness scores of each group were compared using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post hoc test.Results: Self-concept scores did not significantly differ between the groups, except for the popularity subscale.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:No significant differences were found between the levels of social phobia and loneliness among groups (p>0.05).Conclusion: Our findings demonstrated that different malocclusions do not affect patients’ self-concept and psychosocial well-being
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the self-concept and psychosocial status measured by the levels of social phobia and loneliness in a sample of adolescent patients with different malocclusions and to explain the relationships, if any, between malocclusions.Methods: This study was performed on 90 (41 females and 49 males) orthodontic patients with a mean age of 13.52±1.81 years. The patients were divided into three groups (Class I, Class II, and Class III) according to the different types of malocclusions. Piers–Harris Children’s Self-Concept Scale (PHCSCS) was used to determine the self-concepts of patients. In addition, the levels of social phobia and loneliness were measured by Capa Social Phobia Scale for Children and Adolescents (CSPSCA) and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Inventory, respectively. Data were analyzed statistically. The self-concept, social phobia, and loneliness scores of each group were compared using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post hoc test.Results: Self-concept scores did not significantly differ between the groups, except for the popularity subscale. Patients with Class II malocclusion had the lowest popularity scores. No significant differences were found between the levels of social phobia and loneliness among groups (p>0.05).Conclusion: Our findings demonstrated that different malocclusions do not affect patients’ self-concept and psychosocial well-being

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇOKAKOĞLU, S., NALÇACI, R., AKTEPE, E., ÖZYER, G. (2016). Do Different Orthodontic Malocclusions Affect Patients’ Self-Concept and Psychosocial Status?. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 27–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/375040

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 5th ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier; 2012
  2. Vellini-Ferreira F, Monteiro EB. Psychological aspects of orthodontic treatment. Rev Faculdade Odontol FZL. 1989; 1: 21-8
  3. Albino JE, Lawrence SD, Tedesco LA. Psychological and social effects of orthodontic treatment. J Behav Med 1994; 17: 81-98. [CrossRef ] 4. Shaw WC, Rees G, Dawe M, Charles CR. The influence of dentofacial appearance on the social attractiveness of young adults. Am J Orthod 1985; 87: 21-6. [CrossRef ] 5. Phillips C, Beal KN. Self-concept and the perception of facial appearance in children and adolescents seeking orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 2009; 79: 12-6. [CrossRef ] 6. Rogers CR. A theory of therapy, personality and interpersonal relationships as developed in the client-centered framework. In: Koch S (ed), Psychology: A study of a science. Vol. 3, New York: McGraw Hill,1959, p.184-246
  4. Shaw WC, O’Brien KD, Richmond S, Brook P. Quality control in orthodontics: risk/benefit considerations. Br Dent J 1991; 170: 33-7. [CrossRef] 8. Demir T, Karacetin G, Eralp Demir D, Uysal O. Prevalence and some psychosocial characteristics of social anxiety disorder in an urban population of Turkish children and adolescents. Eur Psychiatry 2013; 28: 64-9. [CrossRef ] 9. Junttila N, Laakkonen E, Niemi PM, Ranta K. Modeling the interrelations of adolescents’loneliness, social anxiety and social phobia. Sci Ann Psychol Soc North Greece 2010; 8: 69-99
  5. Dsouza L, Vaid NR, Roy ET, Gururaj B. Shyness, self-Esteem, dental disharmony and orthodontic treatment. Indian J Clin Psychol 2001; 28: 246-51
  6. Nikhilesh V, Roy ET, Lancy D, Ashok S. The bold and the beautiful!!! The influence of dental malocclusion and orthodontic problems on ‘social phobia (shyness)’ and ‘self-esteem’. J Ind Orthod Soc 2010; 44: 32-7
  7. Goswick RA, Jones WH. Loneliness, self-concept and adjustment. J Psychol 1981; 107: 237-40. [CrossRef ] 13. O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Chadwick S, Connolly I, Cook P, et al. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 2: Psychosocial effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124: 488-94. [CrossRef] 14. Piers EV. Manual for the Piers-Harris children’s self concept scale. Acklen, TN: The Western Psychological Services; 1984
  8. Demir T, Eralp-Demir D, Ozmen E, Uysal O. The reliability and validity of Capa Social Phobia Scale for Children