Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Orthodontics / 2016 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

The Effect of Educational Status on the Perception of Social and Spontaneous Smiles

Sayfa
10–15
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The esthetic scores both in social and spontaneous smile decrease with increasing education level, and the most remarkable difference exists between primary school graduates and those with university or higher level of education

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of educational status on the perception of smile esthetics considering social and spontaneous smile patterns.Methods: The present study was conducted on 110 subjects with differing educational status.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Of 110 subjects with a mean age of 39.4 years, 30 were primary school graduates, 30 were high school graduates, and 50 had a university or higher educational level.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The esthetic scores both in social and spontaneous smile decrease with increasing education level, and the most remarkable difference exists between primary school graduates and those with university or higher level of education
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of educational status on the perception of smile esthetics considering social and spontaneous smile patterns.Methods: The present study was conducted on 110 subjects with differing educational status. Of 110 subjects with a mean age of 39.4 years, 30 were primary school graduates, 30 were high school graduates, and 50 had a university or higher educational level. Four different black and white natural social and spontaneous smiling images, captured from a video recording of a 25-year-old female, were prepared displaying the full-face and oral area. A 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the smile esthetics.Results: There were significant differences in the social and spontaneous smiles in a subjective assessment of the smile esthetics in full-face and oral views between participants having a different educational status (p>0.05). Compared with the other groups, the participants in the primary school graduate group gave higher esthetic scores in all the image groups. In terms of esthetic perception, this group was followed by high school graduates and participants with a university or higher level of education. In the four image groups, there was a significant difference between the primary school graduates and participants with a university or higher level of education (p<0.05).Conclusion: Educational status is a sociodemographic factor that can affect the perception of smile esthetics. The esthetic scores both in social and spontaneous smile decrease with increasing education level, and the most remarkable difference exists between primary school graduates and those with university or higher level of education

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DİNDAROĞLU, F., ÖZMUTLU, M. K., IŞIKSAL, E. (2016). The Effect of Educational Status on the Perception of Social and Spontaneous Smiles. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 10–15. https://ajindex.com/articles/375039

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (4)

  1. Kiyak HA. Does orthodontic treatment affect patients’ quality of life? J Dent Educ 2008; 72: 886-94
  2. Ackerman JL, Proffit WR, Sarver DM. The emerging soft tissue paradigm in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Clin Orthod Res 1999; 2: 49-52
  3. Zachrisson BU. Facial esthetics: guide to tooth positioning and maxillary incisor display. World J Orthod 2007; 8: 308-14
  4. Sarver DM, Ackerman MB. Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: Part 2. Smile analysis and treatment strategies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124: 116-27. [CrossRef ] 5. van der Geld PA, Oosterveld P, van Waas MA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Digital videographic measurement of tooth display and lip position in smiling and speech: reliability and clinical application. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131: 301-8. [CrossRef ] 6. Hess U, Kappas A, McHugo GJ, Kleck RE, Lanzetta JT. An analysis of the encoding and decoding of spontaneous and posed smiles: The use of facial electromyography. J Nonverbal Behav 1989; 13: 121-37. [CrossRef ] 7. Tarantili VV, Halazonetis DJ, Spyropoulos MN. The spontaneous smile in dynamic motion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128: 8-15. [CrossRef ] 8. Springer NC, Chang C, Fields HW, Beck FM, Firestone AR, Rosenstiel S, et al. Smile esthetics from the layperson’s perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139: e91-e101. [CrossRef ] 9. Flores-Mir C, Silva E, Barriga M, Lagravere M, Major P. Lay person’s perception of smile aesthetics in dental and facial views. J Orthod 2004; 31: 204-9. [CrossRef ] 10. Havens DC, McNamara JA, Sigler LM, Baccetti T. The role of the posed smile in overall facial esthetics. Angle Orthod 2010; 80: 322- 8. [CrossRef ] 11. Shaw WC, Rees G, Dawe M, Charles C. The influence of dentofacial appearance on the social attractiveness of young adults. Am J Orthod 1985; 87: 21-6. [CrossRef ] 12. Sarver DM, Ackerman MB. Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: part 1. Evolution of the concept and dynamic records for smile capture. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124: 4-12. [CrossRef ] 13. Sharma N, Rosenstiel SF, Fields HW, Beck FM. Smile characterization by U.S. white, U.S. Asian Indian, and Indian populations. J Prosthet Dent 2012; 107: 327-35. [CrossRef ] 14. Moore T, Southard KA, Casko JS, Qian F, Southard TE. Buccal corridors and smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 127: 208-13. [CrossRef ] 15. Krishnan V, Daniel ST, Lazar D, Asok A. Characterization of posed smile by using vis