Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Orthodontics / 2019 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3

The Prevalence of Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: A SingleCenter Experience for 17 Years

Sayfa
139–144
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

While males were affected more by CLP,isolated CP was seen more in females than in males.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of the present study was to report the prevalence of cleft lip and palate (CLP), isolated cleft palate (CP), isolatedcleft lip (CL), and median cleft (MC) applied in Marmara University School of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics.Methods: There were 1058 patients who applied to the center between 2000 and 2017.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A total of 1026 patients were included in thestudy.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:While males were affected more by CLP,isolated CP was seen more in females than in males.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2000 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: The aim of the present study was to report the prevalence of cleft lip and palate (CLP), isolated cleft palate (CP), isolatedcleft lip (CL), and median cleft (MC) applied in Marmara University School of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics.Methods: There were 1058 patients who applied to the center between 2000 and 2017. A total of 1026 patients were included in thestudy. Files, models, and photographs were evaluated. The patients were divided into six groups: unilateral right or left CLP, bilateralCLP, isolated CP, isolated CL, and MC. The prevalence was identified according to cleft type, side, gender, age, and application year.Results: The most common type was unilateral CLP (44.3%), which was observed more on the left side (28.9%), followed by CP(28.7%). MC had a minimum ratio (0.3%) between cleft types. Males were more prone to have unilateral CLP (right side, 64.6%) andbilateral CLP (64.1%), whereas females were more prone to have CP (59.9%). The greatest number of applications was recorded in2004, and the patients mostly applied in the neonatal period (64.9%). The ratios of complete cleft cases in all types of clefts werestatistically significantly higher.Conclusion: Unilateral CLP was the most common cleft type and seen more on the left side. While males were affected more by CLP,isolated CP was seen more in females than in males.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILMAZ, H. N., ÖZBİLEN, E. Ö., ÜSTÜN, T. (2019). The Prevalence of Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: A SingleCenter Experience for 17 Years. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3, 139–144. https://ajindex.com/articles/375010

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Altunhan H, Annagür A, Konak M, Ertuğrul S, Ors R, Koç H. The incidence of congenital anomalies associated with cleft palate/cleft lip and palate in neonates in the Konya region, Turkey. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Borçbakan C. An analysis of 1000 cases of cleft lip and palate in Turkey. Cleft Palate J 1969
  3. Cobourne MT. The complex genetics of cleft lip and palate. Eur J Orthod 2004
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Tunçbilek G, Özgür F, Balcı S. 1229 Additional malformations and syndromes in 1229 cleft lip and palate patients. Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hast Derg 2004
  5. Tomatir AG, Kiray Vural B, Acikbas I, Akdag B. Registries of cases with neural tube defects in Denizli, Turkey, 2004-2010. Genet Mol Res 2014
  6. [CrossRef] 6. IPDTOC Working Group. Prevalence at birth of cleft lip with or without cleft palate: data from the International Perinatal Database of Typical Oral Clefts (IPDTOC). Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2011
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Loane M, Dolk H, Kelly A, Teljeur C, Greenlees R, Densem J
  8. EUROCAT Working Group. Paper 4: EUROCAT statistical monitoring: identification and investigation of ten year trends of congenital anomalies in Europe. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2011
  9. [CrossRef] 8. Tanaka SA, Mahabir RC, Jupiter DC, Menezes JM. Updating the epidemiology of cleft lip with or without cleft palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012
  10. [CrossRef] 9. Ross RB, Johnston MC. Cleft lip and palate. Huntington, New York: Robet E. Kriger Publisher Co, 1978. 10. Vanderas AP. Incidence of cleft lip, cleft palate, and cleft lip and palate among races: A review. Cleft Palate J 1987
  11. Natsume N. Incidence of cleft lip and palate among Japanese newborns, 1982 to 1984. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Kim S, Kim WJ, Oh C, Kim JC. Cleft lip and palate incidence among the live births in the Republic of Korea. J Korean Med Sci 2002
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Murray JC. Gene/environment causes of cleft lip and/or palate. Clin Genet 2002
  14. [CrossRef] 14. Martelli-Junior H, Porto LV, Martelli DR, Bonan PR, Freitas AB, Della Coletta R. Prevalence of nonsyndromic oral clefts in a reference hospital in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, between 2000-2005. Braz Oral Res 2007
  15. [CrossRef] 15. Mossey P. Global strategies to reduce the healthcare burden of craniofacial anomalies. Br Dent J 2003
  16. [CrossRef] 16. Jensen BL, Kreiborg S, Da