Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Orthodontics / 2018 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4

Evaluation of Dentoalveolar and Dentofacial Effects of a Mini-Screw-Anchored Pendulum Appliance in Maxillary Molar Distalization

Sayfa
103–109
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In the maxillary first premolar andincisor positions, significant mesialization was observed; however, the changes in the angles of these teeth were found to be insignificant.Conclusion: A mini-screw-anchored pendulum appliance is an effective method for maxillary molar distalization that controls theundesired anchorage loss observed in conventional methods.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the dentoalveolar and dentofacial effects of a mini-screw-anchored pendulum ap-pliance in maxillary molar distalization.Methods: Twenty patients with the Angle Class II molar relationship (mean age 14.05±2.4 years) were treated with a mini-screw-anchored pendulum appliance for molar distalization.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A mini-screw 1.9 mm in diameter and 9 mm in length was used to supportthe pendulum appliance.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In the maxillary first premolar andincisor positions, significant mesialization was observed; however, the changes in the angles of these teeth were found to be insignificant.Conclusion: A mini-screw-anchored pendulum appliance is an effective method for maxillary molar distalization that controls theundesired anchorage loss observed in conventional methods.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the dentoalveolar and dentofacial effects of a mini-screw-anchored pendulum ap-pliance in maxillary molar distalization.Methods: Twenty patients with the Angle Class II molar relationship (mean age 14.05±2.4 years) were treated with a mini-screw-anchored pendulum appliance for molar distalization. A mini-screw 1.9 mm in diameter and 9 mm in length was used to supportthe pendulum appliance. The springs of the pendulum appliance were activated at 90° and exerted 250-300 gr force per side. Lateralcephalometric radiographs and dental cast models were obtained from all the patients before and after maxillary molar distalization.Results: A 0.6° increase in the SNA and SNB angles, and a 0.3° decrease in the SN/GoGn angle were found to be statistically significant. Inthe maxillary first molars, 4.2-mm significant distalization, 0.6-mm significant intrusion, and 8.9° significant distal tipping were observed.The spontaneous distal drift of the maxillary second premolars was found to be statistically significant. In the maxillary first premolar andincisor positions, significant mesialization was observed; however, the changes in the angles of these teeth were found to be insignificant.Conclusion: A mini-screw-anchored pendulum appliance is an effective method for maxillary molar distalization that controls theundesired anchorage loss observed in conventional methods.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KIRCALI, M., YÜKSEL, A. S. (2018). Evaluation of Dentoalveolar and Dentofacial Effects of a Mini-Screw-Anchored Pendulum Appliance in Maxillary Molar Distalization. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4, 103–109. https://ajindex.com/articles/374867

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (5)

  1. Kingsley N. Treatise on Oral Deformities as a Branch of Medical Sur- gery. New York: D Appleton; 1980. p 131-4. Angle EH. Classification of malocclusion. Dental Cosmos 1899; 41: 248-64. Keles A. Maxillary unilateral molar distalization with sliding me- chanics: a preliminary investigation. Eur J Orthod 2001; 23: 507-15. [CrossRef ] Carano A, Testa M. The distal jet for upper molar distalization. J Clin Orthod 1996; 30: 374-80. Kalra V. The K-loop molar distalizing appliance. J Clin Orthod 1995; 29: 298-301. Hilgers JJ. The pendulum appliance for Class II non-compliance therapy. J Clin Orthod 1992; 26: 706-14.
  2. Ghosh J, Nanda RS. Evaluation of an intraoral maxillary molar distal- ization technique. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 110: 639- 46. [CrossRef ] Byloff FK, Darendeliler MA. Distal molar movement using the pen- dulum appliance. Part 1: Clinical and radiological evaluation. Angle Orthod 1997; 67: 249-60.
  3. Escobar SA, Tellez PA, Moncada CA, Villegas CA, Latorre CM, Oberti G. Distalization of maxillary molars with the bone-supported pen- dulum: a clinical study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131: 545-9. [CrossRef ] Kircelli BH, Pektas ZO, Kircelli C. Maxillary molar distalization with a bone-anchored pendulum appliance. Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 650- 9. olat-Ozsoy O, Kircelli BH, Arman-Ozcirpici A, Pektas ZO, Uckan S. Pendulum appliances with 2 anchorage designs: conventional an- chorage vs bone anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133: 339.e9-339.e-17 Wilmes B, Nienkemper M, Ludwig B, Kau CH, Pauls A, Drescher D. Esthetic Class II treatment with the Beneslider and aligners. J Clin Orthod 2012; 46: 390-8; quiz 437. Sa’aed NL, Park CO, Bayome M, Park JH, Kim Y, Kook YA. Skeletal and dental effects of molar distalization using a modified palatal anchor- age plate in adolescents. Angle Orthod 2015; 85: 657-64. [CrossRef] Kinzinger GS, Wehrbein H, Diedrich PR. Molar distalization with a modified pendulum appliance-in vitro analysis of the force systems and in vivo study in children and adolescents. Angle Orthod 2005; 75: 558-67.
  4. Bussick TJ, McNamara JA Jr. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes as- sociated with the pendulum appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 117: 333-43. [CrossRef ] Byloff FK, Darendeliler MA, Clar E, Darendeliler A. Distal molar move- ment using the pendulum appliance. Part 2: The effects of maxillary molar root uprighting bends. Angle Orthod 1997; 67: 261-70.
  5. Karcher H, Byloff FK, Clar E. The Graz implant supp