Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Orthodontics / 2017 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of Skeletal and Dental Effects of Modified Jasper Jumper Appliance and Delaire Face Mask with Pancherz Analysis

Sayfa
6–14
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Therefore, Modified Jasper Jumper therapy may be an alternative treatment modality for patients with poor cooperation, who are not ideal recipients for Delaire face mask.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the skeletal and dental changes in Class III patients treated with Modified Jasper Jumper appliance and Delaire face mask before the growth peak.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: A study sample comprising 16 patients with functional Class III malocclusion treated with Modified Jasper Jumper appliance and 17 patients treated with Delaire face mask was compared with a control group comprising 13 patients.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Therefore, Modified Jasper Jumper therapy may be an alternative treatment modality for patients with poor cooperation, who are not ideal recipients for Delaire face mask.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the skeletal and dental changes in Class III patients treated with Modified Jasper Jumper appliance and Delaire face mask before the growth peak. Methods: A study sample comprising 16 patients with functional Class III malocclusion treated with Modified Jasper Jumper appliance and 17 patients treated with Delaire face mask was compared with a control group comprising 13 patients. Pancherz analysis was used as the analysis method.Results: In both treatment groups forward movement of maxillary base and incisors and an increase in the overjet while no positional change in the mandibular base was observed. In the Modified Jasper Jumper group, 4.63 mm overjet correction was due to 51.4% skeletal and 48.6% dental changes; 4.77 mm Class III molar correction was due to 49.9% skeletal and 50.1% dental changes. In the Delaire face mask group, 5.17 mm overjet correction was due to 70.6% skeletal and 29.4% dental changes and 4.87 mm Class III molar correction was due to 75% skeletal and 25% dental changes. Conclusion: It was shown that both appliances were skeletally and dentally effective. Therefore, Modified Jasper Jumper therapy may be an alternative treatment modality for patients with poor cooperation, who are not ideal recipients for Delaire face mask.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KILIÇOĞLU, H., ÖĞÜTLÜ, N. Y., ULUDAĞ, C. A. (2017). Evaluation of Skeletal and Dental Effects of Modified Jasper Jumper Appliance and Delaire Face Mask with Pancherz Analysis. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 6–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/371247

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Baccetti T, Franchi L, Me Namara JA. Cephalometric Variables Predicting the Long-Term Success or Failure of Combined Rapid Maxillary Expansion Facial Mask Therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004
  2. [CrossRef ] 2. Baik HS. Clinical results of maxillary protraction in Korean children. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995
  3. [CrossRef ] 3. Williams MD, Sarver DM, Sadowsky DL, Bradley E. Combined RME and protraction facemask in the treatment of Class III malocclusions in growing children. Semin Orthod 1997
  4. [CrossRef ] 4. Fuly CDM, Oliveira AGD, Ursi W. Correction of Class III Malocclusion with Jasper Jumper. J Clin Orthod 2000
  5. Karaman AI, Basciftci FA, Malkoc S. The splinted jasper jumper appliances for class iii skeletal, dental and functional malocclusion (Two Cases Reports). Turk J Ortod 2002
  6. 15(3): 183-92. [CrossRef ] 6. Pham T, Goz G, Bacher M, Alfter G. view clinical applications for the jasper jumper. J Orofacial Orthop 1996
  7. [CrossRef ] 7. Greuclich WW, Pyle SI. Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. 2nd edition, Oxford University press: London 1959. 8. Lin JX, Huang JF, Zeng XL. A cephalometric evaluation of hard and soft tissue changes during class III traction. Eur J Orthod 1985
  8. [CrossRef ] 9. Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment: A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 1982
  9. [CrossRef ] 10. Pancherz H. The Herbst appliance - its biologic effects and clinical use. Am J Orthod 1985
  10. l-20. [CrossRef ] 11. Merwin D, Ngan P, Hagg U, Yiu C, Wei SH. Timing effective application of anteriorly directed orthopedic force to maxilla. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997
  11. [CrossRef ] 12. Kilicoglu H, Kirlic Y. Profile changes in patients with Class III malocclusions after delaire mask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998
  12. [CrossRef ] 13. Nanda R. Bimechanical and clinical considerations of a modified protraction headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1980
  13. [CrossRef ] 14. Ishii H, Morita S, Takeuchi Y, Nakamura S. Treatment effect of combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in severe skeletal Class III cases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987
  14. [CrossRef] 15. Kajiyama K, Murakami T, Suzuki A. Evaluation of the modified maxillary protractor applied to Class III malocclusion with retruded max- illa in early mixed dentition. Am J Or