Dergiler / Turkish archives of pediatrics (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 4

Radiation Dose Reduction in Congenital Heart Disease Patients During Cardiac Catheterization by a Novel Protocol

Sayfa
332–338
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Among all patient groups, the most striking decrease was observed in the diagnosticprocedures we use, of which fluoroscopy is more prominent than cine angiography.Conclusion: We claim that novel radiation dose reduction protocols could be easily appliedwithout increasing fluoroscopy time or losing image quality.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Cardiac catheterization remains a major source of radiation exposure for patientswith congenital heart disease.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study reports the magnitude of radiation with a 3.75 frameper second (fps) pulse fluoroscopy rate and compares the reduction with the previous 15 fpsprotocol during cardiac catheterization for pediatric and adult congenital heart disease.Material and Methods: All diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterization proceduresfrom a single tertiary center were analyzed from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2015, one yearbefore and after implementing lower starting pulse fluoroscopy rates.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Among all patient groups, the most striking decrease was observed in the diagnosticprocedures we use, of which fluoroscopy is more prominent than cine angiography.Conclusion: We claim that novel radiation dose reduction protocols could be easily appliedwithout increasing fluoroscopy time or losing image quality.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2014 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: Cardiac catheterization remains a major source of radiation exposure for patientswith congenital heart disease. This study reports the magnitude of radiation with a 3.75 frameper second (fps) pulse fluoroscopy rate and compares the reduction with the previous 15 fpsprotocol during cardiac catheterization for pediatric and adult congenital heart disease.Material and Methods: All diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterization proceduresfrom a single tertiary center were analyzed from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2015, one yearbefore and after implementing lower starting pulse fluoroscopy rates. The radiation dose wasquantified as air kerma dose (mGy) and dose-area product (DAP; μGy/m2). Radiation exposurewas analyzed for diagnostic and interventional procedures; the diagnostic group was subdividedinto cyanotic and acyanotic patients, whereas the interventional group was subdividedaccording to the most common indications.Results: A total of 786 procedures were analyzed. The median fluoroscopy times and contrastamounts did not show a statistically significant difference between both periods (487 vs. 456 secondsand 42.5 vs. 45.3 cm3). The median air kerma for all procedures showed an 88% reductionafter implementing lower pulse fluoroscopy rates (340-41 mGy). The doses were reduced significantlyfor diagnostic and interventional angiograms from 470 mGy and 162 mGy to 40 mGyand154 mGy. Among all patient groups, the most striking decrease was observed in the diagnosticprocedures we use, of which fluoroscopy is more prominent than cine angiography.Conclusion: We claim that novel radiation dose reduction protocols could be easily appliedwithout increasing fluoroscopy time or losing image quality.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÖKALP, S., TANIDIR, İ. C., ÖZTÜRK, E., ERGÜL, Y., GÜZELTAŞ, A. (2021). Radiation Dose Reduction in Congenital Heart Disease Patients During Cardiac Catheterization by a Novel Protocol. Turkish archives of pediatrics (Online), Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 4, 332–338. https://ajindex.com/articles/370002

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Justino H. The ALARA concept in pediatric cardiac catheterization: techniques and tactics for managing radiation dose. Pediatr Radiol. 2006
  2. 36(Suppl 2):146-153. [CrossRef] 2. Sidhu MK, Goske MJ, Coley BJ et al. Image gently, step lightly: increasing radiation dose awareness in pediatric interventions through an international social marketing campaign. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009
  3. 20(9):1115–1119. [CrossRef] 3. Covi SH, Whiteside W, Yu S, Zampi JD. Pulse fluoroscopy radiation reduction in a Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory. Congenit Heart Dis. 2015
  4. 10(2):E43-E47. [CrossRef] 4. Kleinerman RA. Cancer risks following diagnostic and therapeutic radiation exposure in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2006
  5. 36(Suppl 2):121–125. [CrossRef] 5. Wagner LK. Minimizing radiation injury and neoplastic effects during pediatric fluoroscopy: what should we know? Pediatr Radiol. 2006
  6. 36(Suppl 2):141-145. [CrossRef] 6. Glatz AC, Patel A, Zhu X et al. Patient radiation exposure in a modern, large-volume, pediatric cardiac catheterization laboratory. Pediatr Cardiol. 2014
  7. 35(5):870-878. [CrossRef] 7. Lamers LJ, Moran M, Torgeson JN, Hokanson JS. Radiation reduction capabilities of a next-generation pediatric imaging platform. Pediatr Cardiol. 2016
  8. 37(1):24-29. [CrossRef] 8. Amdani SM, Ross RD, Webster PA Jr,, Turner DR, Forbes TJ, Kobayashi D. Reducing radiation exposure by lowering frame rate in children undergoing cardiac catheterization: a quality improvement study. Congenit Heart Dis. 2018
  9. 13(6):1028-1037. [CrossRef] 9. Boudjemline Y. Effects of reducing frame rate from 7.5 to 4 frames per second on radiation exposure in transcatheter atrial septal defect closure. Cardiol Young. 2018
  10. 28(11):1323-1328. [CrossRef] 10. Pierce DA, Preston DL. Radiation-related cancer risks at low doses among atomic bomb survivors. Radiat Res. 2000
  11. 154(2):178–186. [CrossRef] 11. Mclaughlin JR, Kreiger N, Sloan MP,, Benson LN, Hilditch S, Clarke EA. A historical cohort study of cardiac catheterization during childhood and the risk of cancer. Int J Epidemiol. 1993
  12. 22(4):584- 591. [CrossRef] 12. Modan B, Keinan L, Blumstein T, Sadetzki S. Cancer following cardiac catheterization in childhood. Int J Epidemiol. 2000
  13. 29(3):424- 428. [CrossRef] 13. Spengler RF, Cook DH, Clarke EA, Olley PM, Newman AM. Cancer mortality following cardiac catheterization: a preliminary follow-up study on 4,891 irradiated children. Pediatrics. 1983
  14. 71(2):235-239. 14. Beels L, Bacher K, De Wolf D, Werbrouck J, Thierens