Dergiler / Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Sayı: 0

Effects of Four Different Crops Harvest Processes on Soils Compaction

Sayfa
25–29
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In the measurements of penetration resistance values of 0-20 and 20-40 cm, the values measured before harvest were observed to increase after harvest.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The rapid population growth in the developing world in order to meet the food demands, agricultural land is exposed to high traffic in the year.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:As a result of unconsciously processing the soil; the loss of organic matter increases, the compaction occurs at the top and bottom of soils, the structure breaks down and thereby, soil degradation begins.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In the measurements of penetration resistance values of 0-20 and 20-40 cm, the values measured before harvest were observed to increase after harvest.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The rapid population growth in the developing world in order to meet the food demands, agricultural land is exposed to high traffic in the year. The composed traffic influences negatively the physical properties of the soil. As a result of unconsciously processing the soil; the loss of organic matter increases, the compaction occurs at the top and bottom of soils, the structure breaks down and thereby, soil degradation begins. Because of the degradation, there is a significant decline in productivity. Water storage property of the soil in Konya plain, where it is located in the arid and semi-arid climate zone, has great important. The connection between soil particle array and pore structures is important in terms of soil water holding capacity. In this study, the effects of agricultural machinery on the soils, which are under different cultures (corn, sugar beet, sunflower and wheat), was examined at the pre-harvest and post-harvest stage. Bulk density and soil compaction were measured in the clay soils. The bulk density values showed an alteration between 1.21-1.46. Showed significant differences between pre and post-harvest the bulk density values. In the measurements of penetration resistance values of 0-20 and 20-40 cm, the values measured before harvest were observed to increase after harvest.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

NEGİŞ, H., GÜMÜŞ, İ., ŞEKER, C. (2017). Effects of Four Different Crops Harvest Processes on Soils Compaction. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 0, 25–29. https://ajindex.com/articles/366468

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Alakukku, L., P. Weisskopf, W. Chamen, F. Tijink, J. Van der Linden, S. Pires, C. Sommer and G. Spoor, 2003. Prevention strategies for field traffic-induced subsoil compaction: a review: Part 1. Machine/soil interactions. Soil & Tillage Research, 73(1): 145-160.
  2. Bennett, J.M., S.D. Roberton, T.A. Jensen, D.L. Antille and J. Hall, 2017. A comparative study of conventional and controlled traffic in irrigated cotton: I. Heavy machinery impact on the soil resource. Soil & Tillage Research, 168, 143-154.
  3. Bertrand, A. and H. Kohnke, 1957. Subsoil conditions and their effects on oxygen supply and the growth of corn roots. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 21(2): 135-140.
  4. Blake, G. and K. Hartge, 1986. Bulk density. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part, 1, 363-375.
  5. Busscher, W. and P. Bauer, 2003. Soil strength, cotton root growth and lint yield in a southeastern USA coastal loamy sand. Soil and Tillage Research, 74(2): 151-159. Bygdén, G., L. Eliasson and I. Wästerlund, 2003. Rut depth, soil compaction and rolling resistance when using bogie tracks. Journal of Terramechanics, 40(3): 179-190.
  6. Fullen, M.A. 1985. Compaction, hydrological processes and soil erosion on loamy sands in east Shropshire, England. Soil and Tillage Research, 6(1): 17-29.
  7. Gee, G.W. and J.W. Bauder, 1986. Particle-size analysis. Methods of soil analysis: Part 1-- Physical and mineralogical methods(methodsofsoilan1), 383-411.
  8. Gugino, B.K., G.S. Abawi, O.J. Idowu, R.R. Schindelbeck, L.L. Smith, J.E. Thies, D.W.Wolfe and H.M. Van Es, 2009. Cornell soil health assessment training manual: Cornell University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. Jansson, K. and J. Johansson, 1998. Soil changes after traffic with a tracked and a wheeled forest machine: a case study on a silt loam in Sweden. Forestry, 71(1): 57-66.
  9. Klute, A. 1986. Water retention: laboratory methods. Methods of soil analysis: Part 1-- Physical and mineralogical methods(methodsofsoilan1), 635-662.
  10. Kozlowski, T. 1999. Soil compaction and growth of woody plants. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 14(6): 596-619.
  11. Lowery, B. and R. Schuler, 1991. Temporal effects of subsoil compaction on soil strength and plant growth. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 55(1): 216-223.
  12. Negiş, H. 2014. Şeker pancarı tarımında dönemsel toprak sıkışmasının belirlenmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Nelson, D. and L.E. Sommers, 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical a