Dergiler / The anatolian journal of family medicine (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Results of Newborn Hearing Screening in Tepecik Education and Research Hospital

Sayfa
68–73
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The number of diagnosed and treated babies suffering from hearing loss is increasing as the number of hearing screening tests becomes widespread in Turkey.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: This study aimed to emphasize the significance of newborn hearing screening for detecting con- genital hearing loss within the first 6 months of birth.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: The data of 5399 infants born in the Izmir University of Health Science Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey, and screened for hearing between January 2018 and December 2018 was presented in this study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The number of diagnosed and treated babies suffering from hearing loss is increasing as the number of hearing screening tests becomes widespread in Turkey.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objectives: This study aimed to emphasize the significance of newborn hearing screening for detecting con- genital hearing loss within the first 6 months of birth. Methods: The data of 5399 infants born in the Izmir University of Health Science Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey, and screened for hearing between January 2018 and December 2018 was presented in this study. All term, preterm, and asphytic newborn deliveries in the aforementioned hospital were included. The hearing screening was conducted using the auditory brainstem response (ABR) method. The first step involves the evaluation of the results of all infants before being discharged from the hospital and, the second step involves infants with problems in the results of their first step and subjected to advance testing. Results: This study included 5399 infants in the first and second steps. Of these infants, 5231 (96.9%) passed the first step. Consequently, 136 (2.5%) of the 168 infants evaluated in the second step passed it, while 32 (0.6%) of the infants were evaluated again in more detail in the third step. Six (0.2%) of the infants were not called for further evaluation, and 5 (0.2%) were diagnosed with advanced/very advanced bilateral sensorineu- ral hearing loss. Conclusion: Congenital hearing loss negatively affects the child's language, speaking, communication, and cognitive skills. Newborn hearing screening has an important place in the early diagnosis of congenital hear- ing loss. The number of diagnosed and treated babies suffering from hearing loss is increasing as the number of hearing screening tests becomes widespread in Turkey.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ORUÇ, M. A., ALAN, Y., MERCAN, G. C., TANER, C. E., ÖNCEL, M. Y., ALAN, M., ÖKTEM, A. (2021). Results of Newborn Hearing Screening in Tepecik Education and Research Hospital. The anatolian journal of family medicine (Online), Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 68–73. https://ajindex.com/articles/365068

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Hahn M, Lamprecht-Dinnesen A, Heinecke A, Hartmann S, Bülbül S, Schröder G, et al. Hearing screening in healthy new- borns: feasibility of different methods with regard to test time. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1999;51(2):83–9
  2. Thompson DC, McPhillips H, Davis RL, Lieu TL, Homer CJ, Hel- fand M. Universal newborn hearing screening: summary of evidence. JAMA 2001;286(16):2000–10
  3. Nekahm D, Weichbold V, Welzl-Mueller K, Hirst-Stadlmann A. Improvement in early detection of congenital hearing impair- ment due to universal newborn hearing screening. Int J Pedi- atr Otorhinolaryngol 2001;59(1):23–8
  4. Doyle KJ, Burggraaff B, Fujikawa S, Kim J. Newborn hearing screening by otoacoustic emissions and automated audi- tory brainstem response. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1997;41(2):111–9
  5. Oudesluys-Murphy AM, van Straaten HL, Bholasingh R, van Zanten GA. Neonatal hearing screening. Eur J Pediatr 1996;155(6):429–35
  6. Erenberg A, Lemons J, Sia C, Trunkel D, Ziring P. Newborn and infant hearing loss: detection and intervention. American Academy of Pediatrics. Task Force on Newborn and Infant Hearing, 1998-1999. Pediatrics 1999;103(2):527–30
  7. Jakubíková J, Kabátová Z, Závodná M. Identification of hear - ing loss in newborns by transient otoacoustic emissions. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2003;67(1):15–8
  8. Özkurt FE, Özdoğan F. Newborn otoacoustic emission hearing screening outcomes. KBB Forum 2012;11(2):23–5
  9. Yılmaz B, Küçükbayrak B. Results of newborn hearing screen- ing, Bolu; Turkey. Abant Med J 2013;2(3):204–7
  10. Driscoll C, Beswick R, Doherty E, D'Silva R, Cross A. The validity of family history as a risk factor in pediatric hearing loss. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015;79(5):654–9
  11. Jacobson JT, Jacobson CA, Spahr RC. Automated and con-ventional ABR screening techniques in high-risk infants. J Am Acad Audiol 1990;1(4):187–95
  12. Paludetti G, Ottaviani F, Fetoni AR, Zuppa AA, Tortorolo G. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) in new-borns: normative data. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1999;47(3):235–41
  13. Thornton AR, Kimm L, Kennedy CR. Methodological factors involved in neonatal screening using transient-evoked oto- acoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem re- sponse testing. Hear Res 2003;182(1–2):65–76
  14. Morlet T, Ferber-Viart C, Putet G, Sevin F, Duclaux R. Auditory screening in high-risk pre-term and full-term neonates us- ing transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and brainstem auditory evoked