Dergiler / The anatolian journal of family medicine (Online) / 2019 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

The Comparison of Bone Mineral Density Between Male Smokers and Non-Smokers

Sayfa
19–26
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The mean levels of serum calcium were significantly higher in the case groupthan the control group (p=0.018).Conclusion: We can conclude that smoking has decreasing effects on bone mineral density.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: Osteoporosis is one of the health issues caused by smoking.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:We included 144 male smoker patients, agedbetween 30-60 years-old, and 100 male volunteers, never smoked.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The mean levels of serum calcium were significantly higher in the case groupthan the control group (p=0.018).Conclusion: We can conclude that smoking has decreasing effects on bone mineral density.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objectives: Osteoporosis is one of the health issues caused by smoking. Osteoporosis is the most commonlyseen bone disease and becoming a major public health issue due to extension of lifetime. Studies on detectionof smoking related osteoporosis in males are limited in our country. Therefore we intended to assess the effectsof smoking on bone mineral density in middle aged male patients alongside of related factors.Methods: Our study is a case control type analytical research. We included 144 male smoker patients, agedbetween 30-60 years-old, and 100 male volunteers, never smoked. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the patients'lumbar spine (L1-3 and L2-4) and proximal femur (femur total, femur trochanter and wards triangle) regionsof the individuals were measured anteroposteriorly by using dual energy x-ray absorptiometer (DXA) method.Serum Ca, P, ALP, PTH and total vitamin D levels of the samples were studied.Results: The means of L1-L4 lumbar spine bone mineral density, femoral neck bone mineral density, femoraltrochanter bone mineral density and total femoral bone mineral density were significantly lower in the casegroup than the control group, according to DXA measurements (p=0.017, p=0.047, p=0.005 and p=0.009; respectively). There was a slightly strong correlation and a negative statistically significant difference betweenfemoral trochanter BMD and both cigarette consumption (per-day) and packets-year (r=-0.153, p=0.017 andr=-0.142, p=0.027; respectively). The mean levels of serum calcium were significantly higher in the case groupthan the control group (p=0.018).Conclusion: We can conclude that smoking has decreasing effects on bone mineral density.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

UÇAR, R., MARAKOĞLU, K., GEDİK, G., KIZMAZ, M., LEVENDOĞLU, F. (2019). The Comparison of Bone Mineral Density Between Male Smokers and Non-Smokers. The anatolian journal of family medicine (Online), Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 19–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/365036

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Eastell R, Boyle IT, Compston J, Cooper C, Fogelman I, Francis RM, et al. Management of male osteoporosis: report of the UK Consensus Group. QJM 1998
  2. 91(2):71-92. [CrossRef] 2. Gilbert SM, McKiernan JM. Epidemiology of male osteoporosis and prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2005
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Cheng N, Green ME. Osteoporosis screening for men. Can Fam Physician 2008
  4. Randell A, Sambrook PN, Nguyen TV, Lapsley H, Jones G, Kelly PJ, et al. Direct clinical and welfare costs of osteoporotic fractures in elderly men and women. Osteoporosis Int 1995
  5. Tuzun S, Eskiyurt N, Akarirmak U, Saridogan M, Johansson H, McCloskey E, et al. Turkish Osteoporosis Society. The impact of a FRAX-based intervention threshold in Turkey: the FRAXTURK study. Arch Osteoporos 2012
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Jenkins MR, Denison AV. Smoking status as a predictor of hip fracture risk in postmenopausal women of northwest Texas. Prev Chronic Dis 2008
  7. 5(1):A09. 7. Szulc P, Garnero P, Claustrat B, Marchand F, Duboeuf F, Delmas PD. Increased bone resorption in moderate smokers with low body weight: The Minos Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Moinuddin MM, Jameson KA, Syddall HE, Sayer AA, Martin HJ, Robinson S, et al. Cigarette smoking, birthweight and osteoporosis in adulthood: results from the Hertfordshire cohort study. Open Rheumatol J 2008
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Riebel GD, Boden SD, Whitesides TE, Hutton WC. The effect of nicotine on incorporation of cancellous bone graft in an animal model. Spine 1995
  10. 20(20):2198-202. [CrossRef] 10. Krall EA, DawsonHughes B. Smoking and bone loss among postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 1991
  11. Halperin AC, Smith SS, Heiligenstein E, Brown D, Fleming MF. Cigarette smoking and associated health risks among students at five universities. Nicotine Tob Res 2010
  12. Seltzer V. Smoking and women’s health. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2000
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Turkish Statistical Institute (2012). Available from http://www. tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=1314 2. (Access date:23 Nov 2018) 14. Hoidrup S, Prescott E, Sorensen TI, Gottchau A, Lauritzen JB, SchrollM Grønbaek M. Tobacco smoking and risk of hip fracture in men and women. Int J Epidemiol 2000
  14. Slemenda CW, Christian JC, Reed T, Reister TK, Williams CJ, Johnston CC Jr. Long-term bone loss in men: Effects of genetic and environmental factors. Ann Intern Med 1992
  15. Law MR, Hackshaw AK. A meta