Dergiler / The Journal of Pediatric Research / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

Complications of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Children: A Single Centre Experience

Sayfa
377–381
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Although PEG is a minimally invasive technique, there are some problems which may be experienced by the children and their parents after PEG insertion, the majority of the these being minor complications.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Results: The 91 patients who were included in this study were aged between 1 month and 18 years (median 79 months). 45.1% (n=41) of the patients were female.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Although PEG is a minimally invasive technique, there are some problems which may be experienced by the children and their parents after PEG insertion, the majority of the these being minor complications.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children. Materials and Methods: Ninety-one pediatric patients treated with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) insertion by pull technique in a five-year period were enrolled into this study. Their hospital records were reviewed retrospectively for their demographic data, their primary diseases causing nutritional insufficiency, and any major or minor complications after PEG insertion. Results: The 91 patients who were included in this study were aged between 1 month and 18 years (median 79 months). 45.1% (n=41) of the patients were female. The majority of the patients (76.9%, n=70) had neurological diseases. Nineteen patients (20.9%) had metabolic diseases and two patients had cystic fibrosis (2.2%). We observed 37 (40.7%) complications in total. Three (3.3%) of them were major and 34 (37.4%) of them were minor complications. Conclusion: Endoscopic percutaneous gastrostomy placement is an important way to continue enteral feeding in children. Although PEG is a minimally invasive technique, there are some problems which may be experienced by the children and their parents after PEG insertion, the majority of the these being minor complications.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

IŞIK, İ. A., AKBULUT, U. E., ATALAY, A., KIHTIR, H. S., BAYRAM, Y. (2021). Complications of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Children: A Single Centre Experience. The Journal of Pediatric Research, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 377–381. https://ajindex.com/articles/362695

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Balogh B, Kovacs T, Saxena AK. Complications in children with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement. World J Pediatr 2019; 15:12-6
  2. Hucl T, Spicak J. Complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2016; 30:769-81
  3. Minard G. The history of surgically placed feeding tube. Nutr Clin Pract 2006; 21:626-33
  4. Gauderer MW, Ponsky JL, Izant RJ Jr. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg 1980; 15:872-5
  5. Heuschkel RB, Gottrand F, Devarajan K, et al; European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. ESPGHAN position paper on management of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2015; 60:131-41
  6. McSweeney ME, Smithers CJ. Advances in pediatric gastrostomy placement. Gastrointest Endoscopy Clin N Am 2016; 26:169-85
  7. McSweeney ME, Jiang H, Deutsch AJ, Atmadja M, Lightdale JR. Long-term outcomes of infants and children undergoing percutaneous endoscopy gastrostomy tube placement. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2013; 57:663-67
  8. Fortunato JE, Troy AL, Cuffari C, et al. Outcome after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children and young adults. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2010; 50:390-3
  9. Lalanne A, Gottrand F, Salleron J, et al. Long-term outcome of children receiving percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2014; 59:172-76
  10. Braegger C, Decsi T, Dias JA, et al. ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition: Practical approach to paediatric enteral nutrition: a comment by the ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition. JPGN 2010; 51:110-22
  11. Mahant S, Friedman JN, Connolly B, Goia C, Macarthur C. Tube feeding and quality of life in children with severe neurological impairment. Arch Dis Child 2009; 94:668-73
  12. Adamczyk P, Banaszak B, Szczepańska M, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy as a method of nutrition support in children with chronic kidney disease. Nutr Clin Pract 2012; 27:69-75
  13. Schmitt F, Caldari D, Corradini N, et al. Tolerance and efficacy of preventive gastrostomy feeding in pediatric oncology. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2012; 59:874-80
  14. Frohlich T, Richter M, Carbon R, Barth B, Kohler H. Review article: percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in infants and children. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 31:788-801
  15. Szlagatys-Sidorkiewicz A, Borkowska A, Popinska K, et al. Complications of PEG are not related to age. The result of 10-year mul