KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat / 2021 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

Validation of the Turkish Translation of the Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale in Patients with Peripheral Facial Paralysis

Ağah YENİÇERİ
Fakih Cihat ERAVCI
Mücahit YALÇIN
Hakan TUTAR
Sayfa
45–50
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

By showing high validity and reliability, the Turkish FaCE scale can be used in Turkish-speaking patients with peripheral facial paralysis.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: To transcribe and validate the Facial Clinimetric Evaluation (FaCE) scale to be able to use it in a Turkish-speaking patient population with peripheral facial paralysis (PFP).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Then a validation study was conducted on 37 patients with facial paralysis.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:By showing high validity and reliability, the Turkish FaCE scale can be used in Turkish-speaking patients with peripheral facial paralysis.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Translation · facial clinimetric evaluation scale · validation

Abstract

Objective: To transcribe and validate the Facial Clinimetric Evaluation (FaCE) scale to be able to use it in a Turkish-speaking patient population with peripheral facial paralysis (PFP). Material and Methods: The original English FaCE scale was translated according to international guidelines. Then a validation study was conducted on 37 patients with facial paralysis. The patients completed the scale twice at a 1-week interval. Internal consistency was evaluated with the Cronbach alpha coefficient. The correlations between the FaCE scale and the House-Brackmann Grading System (HBGS), the Sunnybrook Grading System (SBGS), and the Facial Disability Index (FDI) scores and structure validity were evaluated by calculating the Spearman rho correlation coefficient.Results: The FaCE scale showed internal consistency with an excellent Cronbach α value of 0.828. Test-retest reliability was shown with an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) in the range of 0.51-0.95. The FaCE scale was determined to be well correlated with the HBGS and SBGS points (r=-0.51, r=0.65, respectively). The FaCE scale face movement score showed the highest correlation with HBGS (r=-0.61). SBGS had the highest correlation with the oral function score (r=0.61). The study determined there to be a good correlation between the FaCE scale and the social/well-being function and physical function of the FDI (r=0.69, r=0.66, respectively).Conclusion: The FaCE scale is a reliable and valid tool for assessing the quality of life of PFP patients. The Turkısh version of the FaCE Scale showed good psychometric properties. By showing high validity and reliability, the Turkish FaCE scale can be used in Turkish-speaking patients with peripheral facial paralysis.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YENİÇERİ, A., ERAVCI, F. C., YALÇIN, M., TUTAR, H. (2021). Validation of the Turkish Translation of the Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale in Patients with Peripheral Facial Paralysis. The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 45–50. https://ajindex.com/articles/362570

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Owusu JA, Stewart CM, Boahene K. Facial Nerve Paralysis. Med Clin North Am 2018;102(6):1135-43. google scholar 2. Lorch M, Teach SJ. Facial nerve palsy: etiology and approach to diagnosis and treatment. Pediatr Emerg Care 2010;26(10):763-9; quiz 70-3. google scholar 3. Luijmes RE, Pouwels S, Beurskens CH, Kleiss IJ, Siemann I, et al. Quality of life before and after different treatment modalities in peripheral facial palsy: A systematic review. Laryngoscope 2017;127(5):1044-51. google scholar 4. House JW, Brackmann DE. Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985;93(2):146-7. google scholar 5. Ross BG, Fradet G, Nedzelski JM. Development of a sensitive clinical facial grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;114(3):380-6. google scholar 6. Kahn JB, Gliklich RE, Boyev KP, Stewart MG, Metson RB, et al. Validation of a patient-graded instrument for facial nerve paralysis: the FaCE scale. Laryngoscope 2001;111(3):387-98. google scholar 7. VanSwearingen JM, Brach JS. The Facial Disability Index: reliability and validity of a disability assessment instrument for disorders of the facial neuromuscular system. Phys Ther 1996;76(12):1288-98; discussion 98-300. google scholar 8. Györi E, Przestrzelski C, Pona I, Hagmann M, Rath T, et al. Quality of life and functional assessment of facial palsy patients: A questionnaire study. Int J Surg 2018;55:92-7. google scholar 9. Tavares-Brito J, van Veen MM, Dusseldorp JR, Bahmad F, Jr., Hadlock TA. Facial Palsy-Specific Quality of Life in 920 Patients: Correlation With Clinician-Graded Severity and Predicting Factors. Laryngoscope 2019;129(1):100-4. google scholar 10. Bruins TE, van Veen MM, Mooibroek-Leeuwerke T, Werker PMN, Broekstra DC, et al. Association of Socioeconomic, Personality, and Mental Health Factors With Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Facial Palsy. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020;146(4):331-7. google scholar 11. Garcia-Iza L, Chiesa-Estomba CM, Rosell-Romero N, Ibarguren-Esnal E, Soriano-Reixach M, et al. Translation and Validation of the Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale to Spanish. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020:194599820969622. google scholar 12. Barry P, Mancini J, Alshukry A, Salburgo F, Lavieille JP, et al. Validation of French versions of the Facial Disability Index and the Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale, specific quality of life scales for peripheral facial palsy patients. Clin Otolaryngol 2019;44(3):313-22. google scholar 13. Kleiss IJ, Beurskens