Dergiler / The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat / 2020 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

Frequency of frontal cells according to the International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification

Sayfa
33–40
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: Our study results suggest that the regional prevalence of frontal cells classified by the IFAC in Turkish population can be determined radiologically, providing contribution to the generation of estimates of the global prevalence of frontal cells.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: This study aims to determine the regional frequency of frontal cells classified by the International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification IFAC in local population radiologically.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Patients and Methods: Between February 2018 and May 2019, a total of 300 frontal recess regions of 150 adults 88 males, 62 females; mean age 33.5±9.4 years; range, 18 to 54 years eligible for the inclusion criteria and undergoing paranasal sinus PNS computed tomography CT were included in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: Our study results suggest that the regional prevalence of frontal cells classified by the IFAC in Turkish population can be determined radiologically, providing contribution to the generation of estimates of the global prevalence of frontal cells.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Computed tomography · endoscopic sinus surgery · frontal sinus classification

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to determine the regional frequency of frontal cells classified by the International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification IFAC in local population radiologically. Patients and Methods: Between February 2018 and May 2019, a total of 300 frontal recess regions of 150 adults 88 males, 62 females; mean age 33.5±9.4 years; range, 18 to 54 years eligible for the inclusion criteria and undergoing paranasal sinus PNS computed tomography CT were included in the study. In CT analysis; agger nasi cells, supra agger cells, supra agger frontal cell, suprabullar cells, suprabullar frontal cells, supraorbital ethmoid cells and frontal septal cells were evaluated. Results: For anteriorly based cells, there were agger nasi cells, supra agger cells, and supra agger frontal cells with rates of 94.3% n=283 , 40.0% n=120 , and 14.7% n=44 , respectively. For posteriorly based cells, there were suprabullar cells, suprabullar frontal cells, and supraorbital ethmoid cells with rates of 59.7% n=179 , 7.3% n=22 and 7.3% n=22 , respectively. For medially based cells, there were frontal septal cells with a rate of 29.3% n=44 . Conclusion: Our study results suggest that the regional prevalence of frontal cells classified by the IFAC in Turkish population can be determined radiologically, providing contribution to the generation of estimates of the global prevalence of frontal cells.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BAŞER, E., SARIOĞLU, O., BULUT, C., ARSLAN, İ. B., ÇUKUROVA, İ. (2020). Frequency of frontal cells according to the International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification. The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 33–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/362534

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Küçükgünay B, Eski ̇i ̇zmi ̇r G, Ünlü H, Aslan A, Bayındır P, Ovalı G, et al. Normal popülasyonda ve frontal rinosinüzitli olgularda resessus frontalisin anatomik varyasyonlarının radyolojik olarak değerlendirilmesi. Journal of Medical Updates 2012;2:47-52.
  2. Wormald PJ, Hoseman W, Callejas C, Weber RK, Kennedy DW, Citardi MJ, et al. The International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification (IFAC) and Classification of the Extent of Endoscopic Frontal Sinus Surgery (EFSS). Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2016;6:677-96.
  3. Kew J, Rees GL, Close D, Sdralis T, Sebben RA, Wormald PJ. Multiplanar reconstructed computed tomography images improves depiction and understanding of the anatomy of the frontal sinus and recess. Am J Rhinol 2002;16:119-23.
  4. Valdes CJ, Bogado M, Samaha M. Causes of failure in endoscopic frontal sinus surgery in chronic rhinosinusitis patients. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2014;4:502-6.
  5. Svider PF, Sekhsaria V, Cohen DS, Eloy JA, Setzen M, Folbe AJ. Geographic and temporal trends in frontal sinus surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2015;5:46- 54. Lund VJ, Stammberger H, Fokkens WJ, Beale T, Bernal- Sprekelsen M, Eloy P, et al. European position paper on the anatomical terminology of the internal nose and paranasal sinuses. Rhinol Suppl 2014;24:1-34.
  6. Eweiss AZ, Khalil HS. The prevalence of frontal cells and their relation to frontal sinusitis: a radiological study of the frontal recess area. ISRN Otolaryngol 2013;2013:687582. Low CM, Morris JM, Matsumoto JS, Stokken JK, O’Brien EK, Choby G. Use of 3D-Printed and 2D-Illustrated International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification Anatomic Models for Resident Education. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019;161:705-13.
  7. Gotlib T, Kuźmińska M, Kołodziejczyk P, Niemczyk K. Lateral frontoethmoidal cell obstructing frontal sinus drainage pathway - report of six cases. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2018;13:420-8. Wormald PJ. The agger nasi cell: the key to understanding the anatomy of the frontal recess. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:497-507.
  8. Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J, Bachert C, Alobid I, Baroody F, et al. European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2012. Rhinol Suppl 2012;23:3 p preceding table of contents, 1-298.
  9. Chandra RK, Palmer JN, Tangsujarittham T, Kennedy DW. Factors associated with failure of frontal sinusotomy in the early follow-up period. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;131:514-8. Bhattacharyya N. Computed tomographic staging and the fate of the dependent sinuses in revision endo