KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / The European Research Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 6

Relationship between ocular and computed tomography findings in patients with spina bifida

Onur TEMİZSOYLU
Alev KOÇKAR
İbrahim ALATAŞ
Hüseyin CANAZ
Elvan Alper ŞENGÜL
Erdal YÜZBAŞIOĞLU
Sayfa
545–552
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, refraction errors were observed more fr equently as patient age increased.Conclusions: The degree of hydrocephalus does not affect the ocular characteristics of patients with spina bifida, but emmetropization may be deteriorated in these patients.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: Spina bifida is one of the most common congenital diseases in Turkey and around the world.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:We investigated the ocular characteristics of spina bifida patients with and without hydrocephalus.Methods: We included 37 patients who were previously referred to the Istanbul Bilim University, Department of Ophthalmology and already had computed tomography (CT) scans.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, refraction errors were observed more fr equently as patient age increased.Conclusions: The degree of hydrocephalus does not affect the ocular characteristics of patients with spina bifida, but emmetropization may be deteriorated in these patients.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Spina bifida · ocular findings · computed tomography

Abstract

Objectives: Spina bifida is one of the most common congenital diseases in Turkey and around the world. Despite the developing diagnostic and therapeutic methods, abnormal ocular characteristicsin spina bifida patients are still quite common. We investigated the ocular characteristics of spina bifida patients with and without hydrocephalus.Methods: We included 37 patients who were previously referred to the Istanbul Bilim University, Department of Ophthalmology and already had computed tomography (CT) scans. We retrospectively investigated the patients’ ophthalmologic findings (refractive errors, strabismus, and optic disc characteristics) and used their recent CT images to measure the Evans ratios (ERs), which indirectly reflect the grade of hydrocephalus. The patients were divided into three groups according to their ERs (ER ≤ 0.3, 0.3-0.5, and ≥ 0.5), and then the ocular characteristics of these groups were compared. In addition, the patients were divided into three groups according to their ages ( ≤ 1 year, 1-3 years, and ≥ 3 years), and the ERs and rates of refraction defects in these groups were compared.Results: There was no relationship between specific ocular characteristics and ER or between age and ER. However, refraction errors were observed more fr equently as patient age increased.Conclusions: The degree of hydrocephalus does not affect the ocular characteristics of patients with spina bifida, but emmetropization may be deteriorated in these patients.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TEMİZSOYLU, O., KOÇKAR, A., ALATAŞ, İ., CANAZ, H., ŞENGÜL, E. A., YÜZBAŞIOĞLU, E. (2020). Relationship between ocular and computed tomography findings in patients with spina bifida. The European Research Journal, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 6, 545–552. https://ajindex.com/articles/361031

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Fletcher JM, Brei, TJ. Introduction: spina bifida - A multidisciplinary perspective. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2010;16:1-5
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National center on birth defects and developmental disabilities. Promoting the health of babies, children, and adults and enhancing the potential for full, productive living. Annual Report, Fiscal Year. 2012
  3. Onrat ST, Seyman H, Konuk M. Incidence of neural tube defects in Afyonkarahisar, Western Turkey. Genet Mol Res 2009;8:154-61
  4. McComb JG. Spinal and cranial neural tube defects. Semin Pediatr Neurol 1997;4:156-66
  5. Biglan AW. Ophthalmologic complications of meningomyelocele: a longitudinal study. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1990;88:389-462
  6. Gaston H. Ophthalmic complications of spina bifida and hydrocephalus. Eye (Lond) 1991;5(Pt 3):279-90
  7. Gaston H. Does the spina bifida clinic need an ophthalmologist? Z Kinderchir 1985;40(Suppl 1):46-50
  8. Kirkpatrick M, Engleman H, Minns RA. Symptoms and signs of progressive hydrocephalus. Arch Dis Child 1989;64:124-8
  9. Caines E, Dahl M, Holmström G. Longterm oculomotor and visual function in spina bifida cystica: a population-based study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2007;85:662-6
  10. Hunt GM, Oakeshott P, Kerry S. Link between the CSF shunt and achievement in adults with spina bifida. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999;67:591-5
  11. John W, Sharrard W, Zachary RB, Lorber J, Bruce AM. A controlled trial of immediate and delayed closure of spina bifida cystica. Arch Dis Child 1963;38:18-22
  12. Ambarki K, Israelsson H, Wahlin A, Birgander R, Eklund A, Malm J. Brain ventricular size in healthy elderly: comparison between Evans index and volume measurement. Neurosurgery 2010;67:94-9
  13. American Academy of Ophthalmology Pediatric Ophthalmology/Strabismus Panel. Preferred Practice Pattern® Guidelines. Pediatric Eye Evaluations. San Francisco, CA: American Academy of Ophthalmology, 2012
  14. Evans WA. An encephalographic ratio for estimating ventricular enlargement and cerebral atrophy. Arch Neur Psych 1942;47:931-7
  15. Relkin N, Marmarou A, Klinge P, Bergsneider M, Black PM. Diagnosing idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 2005;(3 Suppl):S4-16
  16. Mori E, Ishikawa M, Kato T, Kazui H, Miyake H, Miyajima M, et al; Japanese Society of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: second edition. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2012;52:775-809
  17. Marmarou A, Bergsneider M, Relkin N,