KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2014 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 5

Articles published in Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica between 2003-2012: content, characteristics and publication trends

Merter YALÇINKAYA
A. Erdem BAGATUR
Sayfa
576–583
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The impact factor of AOTT shows a slow but stable increasing trend indicating a growing attention towards the journal.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of this study was to examine publications in Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica (AOTT) between 2003 and 2012 using bibliometric methods and to describe publication trends, characteristics and patterns of orthopedic publications in Turkey.Methods: All articles published in AOTT between 2003 and 2012 were identified and classified according to their study design and subspecialty of orthopedics.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The following parameters from each manuscript were also identified: (1) the number of authors, (2) the number of institutions of the authors, (3) institutional affiliation of the first author, (4) origin of country of the first author, (5) sample size, (6) study outcome, (7) presence or absence of statistical methods, (8) presence of funding, and (9) time from submission to acceptance.Results: A total of 699 eligible articles were identified.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The impact factor of AOTT shows a slow but stable increasing trend indicating a growing attention towards the journal.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2003 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine publications in Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica (AOTT) between 2003 and 2012 using bibliometric methods and to describe publication trends, characteristics and patterns of orthopedic publications in Turkey.Methods: All articles published in AOTT between 2003 and 2012 were identified and classified according to their study design and subspecialty of orthopedics. The following parameters from each manuscript were also identified: (1) the number of authors, (2) the number of institutions of the authors, (3) institutional affiliation of the first author, (4) origin of country of the first author, (5) sample size, (6) study outcome, (7) presence or absence of statistical methods, (8) presence of funding, and (9) time from submission to acceptance.Results: A total of 699 eligible articles were identified. The most common study designs were retrospective observational studies and case reports. The most common subspecialties of orthopedics were orthopedic trauma and hand and microsurgery. Institutional affiliation of the first author was a university hospital in 56.4% of the studies and origin of country of the first author was Turkey in 93.4%. Time from submission to acceptance was a mean of 7.11 months.Conclusion: This study revealed the current status and trends of orthopedic publications in Turkey in the leading Turkish orthopedic journal AOTT over a 10-year period. The impact factor of AOTT shows a slow but stable increasing trend indicating a growing attention towards the journal.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YALÇINKAYA, M., BAGATUR, A. E. (2014). Articles published in Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica between 2003-2012: content, characteristics and publication trends. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 5, 576–583. https://ajindex.com/articles/353649

Kaynakça (18)

  1. Rehn C, Kronman U. Bibliometric handbook for Karolinska Institutet. [Cited 2013 Sep 8]. Available from: http:// ki.se/content/1/c6/01/79/31/bibliometric_handbook_ karolinska_institutet_v_1.05.pdf
  2. Schubert A. Scientometrics in medicine-related fields 1990-1999. Scientometrics 2000;48:251-84
  3. The NLM Catalog. [Cited 2013 Dec 8]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?cmd=historys earch&querykey=3
  4. Demirhan M. From The Editor. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2008;42:149-53
  5. Hasenboehler EA, Choudhry IK, Newman JT, Smith WR, Ziran BH, Stahel PF. Bias towards publishing positive results in orthopedic and general surgery: a patient safety issue? Patient Saf Surg 2007;1:4
  6. Önder Kılıçoğlu. Personal communication. January 7, 2014
  7. Thomson Reuters. Journal Citation Reports. [Cited 2012 Sep 8]. Available from: http://scientific.thomson.com/ products/jcr/
  8. Thomson Reuters. ISI Web of Knowledge. Journal Citation Reports. [Cited 2013 Oct 15]. Available from: http:// admin-apps.webofknowledge.com/JCR/JCR?PointOfEn try=Home&SID=S2ifUC4xt34M848KJZb
  9. Centre for Evidence Based Medicine. [Cited 2013 Dec 8]. Available from:
  10. Moverley R, Rankin KS, McNamara I, Davidson DJ, Reed M, Sprowson AP. Impact factors of orthopedic journals between 2000 and 2010: trends and comparisons with other surgical specialties. Int Orthop 2013;37:561-7
  11. Lee KM, Ryu MS, Chung CY, Choi IH, Kwon DG, Kim TW, et al. Characteristics and trends of orthopedic publications between 2000 and 2009. Clin Orthop Surg 2011;3:225-9
  12. Rahman M, Fukui T. Biomedical publication - global profile and trend. Public Health 2003;117:274-80
  13. Rahman M, Fukui T. Biomedical research productivity: factors across the countries. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2003;19:249-52
  14. Ömeroğlu H. The status of Turkish orthopedics and traumatology on national and international platforms in terms of scientific publications. [Article in Turkish] Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2010;44: Orthopaedic Forum. III-V
  15. Bhandari M, Busse J, Devereaux PJ, Montori VM, Swiontkowski M, Tornetta III P, et al. Factors associated with citation rates in the orthopedic literature. Can J Surg 2007;50:119-23
  16. Weale AR, Lear PA. Randomised controlled trials and quality of journals. Lancet 2003;361:1749-50
  17. Author Guidelines. [Cited 2014 Feb 13]. Available from:
  18. Camp M, Escott BG. Authorship proliferation i