Dergiler / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2019 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 4

Publication rates of abstracts presented at the 23rd (2013) and 24th (2014) National Turkish Orthopedics and Traumatology Congresses: We are not improving

Sayfa
248–254
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The publication rates of the abstracts presented at these congresses did not improve when compared with the 20th (2007) congress.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine 1) the publication rates of podium and poster presentations from the 23rd (2013) and the 24th (2014) National Turkish Orthopedics and Traumatology Congresses in peer-reviewed journals and (2) compare these rates with publication rates from the 20th congress (2007) published previously.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The secondary objective was to determine the time lag to publication and compare this data with the data from the 20th congress.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The publication rates of the abstracts presented at these congresses did not improve when compared with the 20th (2007) congress.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2013 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine 1) the publication rates of podium and poster presentations from the 23rd (2013) and the 24th (2014) National Turkish Orthopedics and Traumatology Congresses in peer-reviewed journals and (2) compare these rates with publication rates from the 20th congress (2007) published previously. The secondary objective was to determine the time lag to publication and compare this data with the data from the 20th congress. Methods: All abstracts from the scientific programs of the 23rd (2013) and the 24th (2014) National Turkish Orthopedics and Traumatology Congresses were identified and computerized PubMed searches were conducted to determine whether an abstract had been followed by publication of a full-text article in peer-reviewed journals. The time lag to publication was also noted. Results: Of the 993 presentation abstracts (302 podium and 691 poster presentations) from the 23rd congress and of the 940 presentation abstracts (310 podium and 630 poster presentations) from the 24th congress, 278 (28%) and 234 (24.9%) were followed by a full-text article in peer-reviewed journals indexed by PubMed, respectively. The rates of publication of the podium and poster presentations were 39.4% (119/302) and 23% (159/691), respectively from the 23rd and 37.7% (117/310) and 18.6% (117/630), respectively from the 24th congresses. The mean time to publication of the abstracts from the 23rd congress was 12.8 ± 18.8 (median: 13, range: 140 to 47) months and the mean time to publication of the abstracts from the 24th congress was 11.1 ± 14.42 (median: 11, range: 73 to 39) months. Fifty (50/ 278, 18%) abstracts from the 23rd congress (mean 11, range: [32][1], median 5 months) and 37 (37/234, 15.8%) abstracts from the 24th congress (mean 10.4, range: [73][1], median 4 months) were published as full-text articles prior to the presentation at the congress. Conclusion: The vast majority of abstracts presented at 23rd (2013) and the 24th (2014) National Turkish Orthopedics and Traumatology Congresses were not followed by publication of a full-text article in peerreviewed journals. The publication rates of the abstracts presented at these congresses did not improve when compared with the 20th (2007) congress.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BAGATUR, E., YALÇINKAYA, M. (2019). Publication rates of abstracts presented at the 23rd (2013) and 24th (2014) National Turkish Orthopedics and Traumatology Congresses: We are not improving. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 4, 248–254. https://ajindex.com/articles/353494

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH, et al. An observational study of orthopaedic abstracts and subsequent full-text publications. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(4):615e621. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200204000-00017.
  2. Yalçınkaya M, Bagatur E. Fate of abstracts presented at a National Turkish Orthopedics and Traumatology Congress: publication rates and consistency of abstracts compared with their subsequent full-text publications. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2013;47(4):223e230. https://doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2013.3073.
  3. Daruwalla ZJ, Huq SS, Wong KL, Nee PY, Murphy DP. “Publish or perish”-presentations at annual national orthopaedic meetings and their correlation with subsequent publication. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015;10:58. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s13018-015-0203-y. XXIII. Ulusal Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Kongresi. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2013;47(Suppl-I):1e361. XXIV. Ulusal Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Kongresi. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2014;48(Suppl-I):1e303. Reuters Thomson. Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List. http://mjl.clarivate. com. Accessed March 10, 2018.
  4. Collier T, Roadley-Battin M, Darlow C, Chant P, Hing CB, Smith TO. Analysis of conference abstract-to-publication rate in UK orthopaedic research. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018;23(1):7e11. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2017-110831.
  5. Donegan DJ, Kim TW, Lee GC. Publication rates of presentations at an annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(5):1428e1435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-1171-5.
  6. Frost C, Rubery PT, Mesfin A. The publication rate of presentations at two international spine meetings: Scoliosis Research Society and international meeting of advanced spinal techniques. Spine Deform. 2015;3(6):528e532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2015.04.009.
  7. Croker JD, Bydder SA. Publication rates of abstracts presented at the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists annual scientific meetings: any change since 2004? J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2018;62(4):568e572. https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12721.
  8. Kumaragurupari R, Sengupta S, Bhandari S. Publication rates from the All India Ophthalmic Conference 2010 compared to 2000: are we improving? Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016;64(10):722e726. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.195007.
  9. Yoon RS, Lloyd EW, McGrory B, Bal BS, Macaulay W. Studies presented in poster format at the annual meetings of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons: how do they fare in the peer revie