KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies / 2018 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Competitive Advantage and Clusters: What Can We Learn from Nine Turkish Clusters?

Rekabetçi Avantaj ve Kümelenmeler: Dokuz Türk Kümelenmesinden Ne Öğrenebiliriz?

Nigar Çağla MUTLUCAN
Sayfa
47–76
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The Partial Least Squares path model analysis of data from 160 surveyed firms located in nine Turkish clusters revealed that only entrepreneurial orientation and support ties contributed significantly and positively to firm performance.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Many researchers have studied the ability of clusters to promote innovation, regional economic development, and national prosperity; however, these studies had been mostly conducted at the cluster level, not at the firm level.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The theoretical model presumes positive relationships between several constructs and firm performance, namely, business ties, support ties, entrepreneurial orientation and strategic learning capability.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The Partial Least Squares path model analysis of data from 160 surveyed firms located in nine Turkish clusters revealed that only entrepreneurial orientation and support ties contributed significantly and positively to firm performance.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Many researchers have studied the ability of clusters to promote innovation, regional economic development, and national prosperity; however, these studies had been mostly conducted at the cluster level, not at the firm level. This study attempts to bring the cluster discourse back to the firm by answering the following research question: how do firms create and defend competitive advantages through clusters? The theoretical model presumes positive relationships between several constructs and firm performance, namely, business ties, support ties, entrepreneurial orientation and strategic learning capability. Furthermore, these relationships are supposed to be enhanced by the moderating effect of the cluster construct. The Partial Least Squares path model analysis of data from 160 surveyed firms located in nine Turkish clusters revealed that only entrepreneurial orientation and support ties contributed significantly and positively to firm performance.

Abstract

Birçok araştırmacı kümelenmelerin inovasyona, bölgesel ekonomik gelişmeye ve milli refaha katkı yapma yetisini araştırmış, ancak bu çalışmalar çoğunlukla firma seviyesinde değil, kümelenme seviyesinde yürütülmüştür. Bu nedenle, bu çalışma firmaların kümelenmeler vasıtasıyla nasıl rekabetçi avantaj yarattıkları ve bunu nasıl savundukları sorusuna cevap aramış ve kümelenme ile ilgili söylemi tekrar firma seviyesine getirmeye çalışmıştır. Teorik model birçok değişken ve firma performansı arasındaki pozitif ilişkiler öngörmektedir; bu değişkenler iş bağlantıları, destek bağlantıları, girişimci yönelim ve stratejik öğrenme yetisidir. Ayrıca, bu ilişkilerin kümelenmenin moderatör etkisi nedeniyle daha artacağı varsayılmıştır. Dokuz Türk kümelenmesinde yer alan ve anket yollanmış 160 firmadan elde edilen verilerin PLS modeli analizi sonucunda, sadece girişimci yönelim ve destek bağlantılarının firma performansını anlamlı ve pozitif şekilde etkilediği bulunmuştur.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MUTLUCAN, N. Ç. (2018). Competitive Advantage and Clusters: What Can We Learn from Nine Turkish Clusters?. Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 47–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/352199

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Acquaah, M. (2007). “Managerial Social Capital, Strategic Orientation, and Organizational Performance in an Emerging Economy,” Strategic Management Journal, 28: 1235-1255.
  2. Asheim, B., Cooke, P., and Martin, R. (2006). Clusters and Regional Development: Critical Reflections and Explorations. Oxon: Routledge. Becattini, G. (1990). “The Marshallian Industrial District as a Socio-Economic Notion,” in F. Pyke, G. Becattini, W. Sengenberger (ed.), Industrial Districts and Inter-Firm Co-Operation in Italy: 37-51. Geneva: International Institute for Labor Studies. Berkman, Ü. and Özen, Ş. (2008). “Culture and Management in Turkey: State-Dependency and Paternalism in Transition,” in E. Davel, J.P. Dupuis and J.F. Chanlat (ed.), Gestion en Contexte Interculturel: Approches, Problématiques, Pratiques et Plongées. Chapter VI.4. Québec: Presse de L’Université Laval et Téléuniversité (UQAM). Buğra, A. (1994). State and Business in Modern Turkey: A Comparative Study. Albany: SUNY Press.
  3. Covin, J.G., Green, K.M., and Slevin, D.P. (2006). “Strategic Process Effects on the Entrepreneurial Orientation-Sales Growth Rate Relationship,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30: 57-82.
  4. Dimitratos, P., Lioukas, S., and Carter, S. (2004). “The Relationship Between Entrepreneurship and International Performance: The Importance of Domestic Environment,” International Business Review, 13: 19-41.
  5. Garrett, R.P., Covin, J.G., and Slevin, D.P. (2009). “Market Responsiveness, Top Management Risk Taking, and the Role of Strategic Learning as Determinants of Market Pioneering,” Journal of Business Research, 62(8): 782-788.
  6. Gilbert, B.A., McDougall, P.P., and Audretsch, D.B. (2008). “Clusters, Knowledge Spillovers, and New Venture Performance: An Empirical Examination,” Journal of Business Venturing, 23(4): 405-422.
  7. Krugman, P.R. (1991). “Increasing Returns and Economic Geography,” Journal of Political Economy, 49: 137-150.
  8. Krugman, P.R. (1998). “What’s New in the Economic Geography,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14(2): 7-17.
  9. Kukalis, S. (2010). “Agglomeration Economies and Firm Performance,” Journal of Management, 36 (2): 453-481.
  10. Lazzeretti, L. (2003). “City of Art as High Culture Local System and Cultural Districtualisation Process: The Cluster of Art Restoration in Florence,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27: 635-648.
  11. Li, J. and Geng, S. (2012). “Industrial Clusters, Shared Resources and Firm Performance,” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development: An Interna