KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Business and Management Studies: An International Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

ENVIRONMENTALISM AND ETHICAL DECISION MAKING IN BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS

ÇEVRECİLİK VE İŞLETMELERDE AHLAKÎ KARAR ALMA

Ahmet COŞKUN
Sayfa
37–49
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Demographic factor groups were found to have no significant differencesin any of the variables.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study tries to reveal the dynamics of ethical business decision making processabout environmental issues, in terms of Theory of planned behaviour framework.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:To do so, asurvey analysis was held with 167 university students by taking an online questionnaireand the data were statistically analysed by using a statistic software(SPSS).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Demographic factor groups were found to have no significant differencesin any of the variables.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

This study tries to reveal the dynamics of ethical business decision making processabout environmental issues, in terms of Theory of planned behaviour framework. To do so, asurvey analysis was held with 167 university students by taking an online questionnaireand the data were statistically analysed by using a statistic software(SPSS). Results showed that ethical behaviour intentions have significant positiverelationships with environmentalism, ethical attitudes toward environment and perceivedbehavioural control. Demographic factor groups were found to have no significant differencesin any of the variables.

Abstract

Bu çalışma, planlanmış davranış kuramı bağlamında, çevresel konularla ilgili ahlaki iş kararları verme sürecinin dinamiklerini ortaya çıkarmaya çalışmaktadır. Bunun için İİBF bölümlerinde okuyan 167 üniversite öğrencisi ile anket yöntemiyle saha araştırması yapılmış ve elde edilen veriler istatistik paket programı vasıtasıyla istatistiki analize tabi tutulmuştur. Sonuçlar, ahlakî davranış niyetlerinin çevrecilik, çevreye yönelik ahlaki tutumlar ve algılanan davranışsal kontrol ile anlamlı pozitif ilişkilere sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Demografik faktör gruplarının hiçbir değişkende anlamlı farklılık göstermediği görülmüştür.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

COŞKUN, A. (2020). ENVIRONMENTALISM AND ETHICAL DECISION MAKING IN BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 37–49. https://ajindex.com/articles/352104

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to action: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmenn (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). New York: Springer. Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
  2. Aytaç, M. & Öngen, B. (2012). Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile yeni çevresel paradigma ölçeğinin yapı geçerliliğinin incelenmesi. İstatistikçiler Dergisi, 5, 14-22.
  3. Banerjee, S. B. (2002). Corporate environmentalism: The construct and its measurement. Journal of business research, 55(3), 177-91.
  4. Bechtel, R. B., Verdugo, V. C., & de Queiroz Pinheiro, J. (1999). Environmental belief systems: United States, Brazil, and Mexico. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(1), 122-28. de Anguita, P. M., Alonso, E., & Martin, M. A. (2008). Environmental economic, political and ethical integration in a common decision-making framework. Journal of environmental management, 88(1), 154- 64. Dubinsky, A. J., & Loken, B. (1989). Analyzing ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Business Research, 19(2), 83-107.
  5. Dunlap, R. E. (1980). Paradigmatic change in social science: from human exemptions to an ecological paradigm. American Behavioral Scientist, 24(1), 5-14.
  6. Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425-42. Erdoğan, N. (2009), Testing the new ecological paradigm scale: Turkish case. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4(10), 1023–31.
  7. Ferrell, O. C., & Gresham, L. G. (1985). A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49(3), 87-96.
  8. Flannery, B. L., & May, D. R. (2000). Environmental ethical decision making in the US metal-finishing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 642-62.
  9. Gillian, C. (1993). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  10. Graham, J. W. (1986). Principled organizational dissent: A theoretical essay. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 1–52.
  11. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th Ed.), Pearson. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243-48.
  12. Harmes, A. (2011). The limits of carbon disclosure: theorizing the business case for investor envi