Dergiler / Business and Management Studies: An International Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

AN INTERNATIONAL STRATEGY FOR QUALITY IN HEALTHCARE BEYOND TURKEY: THREE COUNTRY REVIEW

TÜRKİYE'NİN ÖTESİNDE SAĞLIKTA KALİTE İÇİN ULUSLARARASI BİR STRATEJİ: ÜÇ ÜLKE DEĞERLENDİRMESİ

Sayfa
926–945
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In addition to the basic factors such as cultural and historical relations,all three countries examined offer important cooperation opportunities in terms of the general structure of healthsystems and the countries' quality and accreditation objectives.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:One of the main rights of the people is regarded as the equality in access to health services and itsassurance.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The countries' potential for cooperation with Turkey reviewed bylooking the overall structure of these countries, health systems, applications and quality are attempted to beaddressed by examining future strategies.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In addition to the basic factors such as cultural and historical relations,all three countries examined offer important cooperation opportunities in terms of the general structure of healthsystems and the countries' quality and accreditation objectives.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

One of the main rights of the people is regarded as the equality in access to health services and itsassurance. This study aims to examine the health care quality practices and cooperation potentials of the threecountries , The Republic of North Macedonia, The Republic of Kosovo and Azerbaijan, within the framework ofTÜSKA's international cooperation potential. The countries' potential for cooperation with Turkey reviewed bylooking the overall structure of these countries, health systems, applications and quality are attempted to beaddressed by examining future strategies. In addition to the basic factors such as cultural and historical relations,all three countries examined offer important cooperation opportunities in terms of the general structure of healthsystems and the countries' quality and accreditation objectives.

Abstract

İnsanların temel haklarından biri sağlık hizmetlerine erişimde güvence ve eşitlik olarak kabul edilmektedir. Bu çalışma, TÜSKA'nın uluslararası işbirliği potansiyeli çerçevesinde üç ülkenin, Kuzey Makedonya Cumhuriyeti, Kosova Cumhuriyeti ve Azerbaycan'ın sağlık hizmetleri kalite uygulamalarını ve işbirliği potansiyellerini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Ülkelerin Türkiye ile işbirliği potansiyeli, bu ülkelerin genel yapısına bakılarak gözden geçirilmiş, sağlık sistemleri, kalite uygulamaları ve gelecek stratejileri incelenerek ele alınmaya çalışılmıştır. İncelenen her üç ülke de kültürel ve tarihi ilişkiler gibi temel faktörlerin yanı sıra sağlık sistemlerinin genel yapısı, ve ülkelerin kalite ve akreditasyon hedefleri açısından önemli iş birliği fırsatları sunmaktadır.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KAYRAL, İ. H. (2019). AN INTERNATIONAL STRATEGY FOR QUALITY IN HEALTHCARE BEYOND TURKEY: THREE COUNTRY REVIEW. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 926–945. https://ajindex.com/articles/351968

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Agency for Quality and Accreditation of Health Care and Social Welfare, 2019, web site: http://www.aaz.hr/en/about-us, (accessed 27 March 2019)
  2. Allcock JB, Young A, Lampe JR (2019),. Kosovo Self-Declared Independent Country, 2019, Britannica Articles, https://www.britannica.com/place/Kosovo, (accessed 02 April 2019) Azerbaijan: Human Development Indicators in human development reports. New York: United Nations Development Programmes; 2018 (http://hdr.undp.org/en/countries/profiles/AZE, (accessed 11 April 2019).
  3. Braithwaite J, Mannion R, Matsuyama Y, Shekelle P, Whittaker S, Al-Adawi S. (2017), Health Systems Improvement Across the Globe: Success Stories from 60 Countries Retrieved from Berktaş and Kayral, “Turkey Establishment of a National Healthcare Accreditation System” 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300 Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742 CRC Press 2017
  4. Chichevalieva S, Milevska N (2012). Participatory democracy in public health: committee for healthcare system advancement in Macedonia. Journal for European Issues Evrodijalog, 17:187–204.
  5. Coper L, Parkes A, (2008), Government of Kosovo World Bank Health Sector Master Planning Danforth L. (2019),
  6. North Macedonia, Britannica Articles, https://www.britannica.com/place/North-Macedonia, (accessed 18 March 2019)
  7. Edward AG. Ronald MH, Suny G, Evgeny Dmitrievich Silaev ED. (2019), Azerbaijan, https://www.britannica.com/place/Azerbaijan.
  8. Freedom House (2011). Nations In Transit 2011: country report on Macedonia, Washington, Freedom House. (http://www.freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/2011/macedonia, (accessed 16 March 2019)
  9. Gjorgjev D, Bacanovic A, Cicevalieva S, Sulevski Z, Grosse-Tebbe S. (2006), The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: health system review. Health Systems in Transition, 8(2):1–98. Health Strategy of the Republic of Macedonia, 2020
  10. Safe, Efficient and Just Health Care System (2007), Republic of Macedonia Ministry of Health HIF Annual Report, (2016), Health Insurance Fund Annual Report 2015, http://www.fzo.org.mk/WBStorage/Files/Godisen%20izvestaj%202015.pdf, (accessed 25 March 2019).
  11. Ibrahimov F, Ibrahimova A, Kehler J, Richardson E. (2010) Azerbaijan: Health system review. Geneva, World Health Organization, Health Systems in Transition, Vol.12. No.3 Institute for Accreditation of the Republic of North Macedonia, (2019), IARM web site: http://iarm.gov.mk/ (accessed 07 March 2019).
  12. Institute of Public Health (2015). Utilisation of the hospital facilities in the Republic of Macedonia in 201