Dergiler / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 11

Assessment of PM2.5 population exposure of a community using sensor based air monitoring instruments and similar time-activity groups

Sayfa
1971–1981
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It is suggested that thismethodology could be applied to assess the real-time and long-term cumulative exposures of a given community.It is expected that an exposure surveillance system can be developed based on these results.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Although fixed ambient air monitoring stations provide data regarding ambient PM2.5 concentrations within agiven community, they present limitations in terms of assessing the actual exposure to individuals and populations using time-activity patterns.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, we provide apossible methodology to assess the population exposure to PM2.5 in a given community.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It is suggested that thismethodology could be applied to assess the real-time and long-term cumulative exposures of a given community.It is expected that an exposure surveillance system can be developed based on these results.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Although fixed ambient air monitoring stations provide data regarding ambient PM2.5 concentrations within agiven community, they present limitations in terms of assessing the actual exposure to individuals and populations using time-activity patterns. The population exposure of a community may be estimated by classifyingthe population according to the time-activity pattern and modeling their exposure. In this study, we provide apossible methodology to assess the population exposure to PM2.5 in a given community. Five field techniciansconducted exposure simulations for similar time-activity groups of preschool children, school students, homemakers, office workers, and elderly, with PM2.5 personal exposure monitoring (PEM) equipment, in Guro-gu,Seoul, Korea. The PM2.5 exposure concentrations were modeled by interpolation (point in polygon, inversedistance weighted, and ordinary kriging methods) and regression models using GPS data and a sensor-based airmonitoring instrument network, and were compared with the PEM data. The population exposure to PM2.5 wasestimated using the population-weighted average through Monte–Carlo simulation. Elderly presented thehighest average PM2.5 exposure concentration followed by office workers, homemakers, preschool children, andschool students. The correlation between the measured and modeled exposure was good, in the order of ordinarykriging (R2 = 0.822), inverse distance weighted (R2 = 0.747), and point in polygon methods (R2 = 0.721).Thirty-seven percent of the population in a community was exposed to PM2.5 concentrations higher than 35 μg/m3, which is the Korean Atmospheric Environmental Standard for PM2.5 (24-h average). It is suggested that thismethodology could be applied to assess the real-time and long-term cumulative exposures of a given community.It is expected that an exposure surveillance system can be developed based on these results.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

PARK, J., RYU, H., KIM, E., CHOE, Y., HEO, J., LEE, J., CHO, S., SUNG, K., CHO, M., YANG, W. (2020). Assessment of PM2.5 population exposure of a community using sensor based air monitoring instruments and similar time-activity groups. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 11, 1971–1981. https://ajindex.com/articles/351447

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Amaral, S.S., de Carvalho, J.A., Costa, M.A.M., Pinheiro, C., 2015. An overview of particulate matter measurement instruments. Atmosphere 6, 1327–1345. https://doi. org/10.3390/atmos6091327. Amouei Torkmahalleh, M., Zhao, Y., Hopke, P.K., Rossner, A., Ferro, A.R., 2013. Additive impacts on particle emissions from heating low emitting cooking oils. Atmos. Environ. 74, 194–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.03.038.
  2. Batterman, S., 2017. Review and extension of CO2-based methods to determine ventilation rates with application to school classrooms. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 14, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14020145.
  3. Beauchamp, M., de Fouquet, C., Malherbe, L., 2017. Dealing with non-stationarity through explanatory variables in kriging-based air quality maps. Spat. Stat. 22, 18–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2017.08.003.
  4. Bekö, G., Kjeldsen, B.U., Olsen, Y., Schipperijn, J., Wierzbicka, A., Karottki, D.G., Toftum, J., Loft, S., Clausen, G., 2015. Contribution of various microenvironments to the daily personal exposure to ultrafine particles: personal monitoring coupled with GPS tracking. Atmos. Environ. 110, 122–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015. 03.053. Benabbas, A., Geißelbrecht, M., Martin Nikol, G., Mahr, L., Nähr, D., Steuer, S., Wiesemann, G., Müller, T., Nicklas, D., Wieland, T., 2019. Measure particulate matter by yourself: data-quality monitoring in a citizen science project. J. Sensors Sens. Syst. 8, 317–328. https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-8-317-2019.
  5. Breen, M.S., Long, T.C., Schultz, B.D., Williams, R.W., Richmond-Bryant, J., Breen, M., Langstaff, J.E., Devlin, R.B., Schneider, A., Burke, J.M., Batterman, S.A., Meng, Q.Y., 2015. Air pollution exposure model for individuals (EMI) in health studies: evaluation for ambient PM2.5 in Central North Carolina. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 14184–14194. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02765.
  6. Breen, M., Seppanen, C., Isakov, V., Arunachalam, S., Breen, Miyuki, Samet, J., Tong, H., 2019. Development of tracmyair smartphone application for modeling exposures to ambient PM2.5 and ozone. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 16, 3468. https://doi. org/10.3390/ijerph16183468. Breen, M., Xu, Y., Schneider, A., Williams, R., Devlin, R., 2018. Modeling individual exposures to ambient PM2.5 in the diabetes and the environment panel study (DEPS). Sci. Total Environ. 626, 807–816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.139.
  7. Burke, J.M., Zufall, M.J., Özkaynak, H., 2001. A populati