Dergiler / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2017 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of PM surface concentrations simulated by Version 1 of NASA's MERRA Aerosol Reanalysis over Europe

Sayfa
374–382
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The concentration of fine sea salt particles was consistently and largely overestimated, but contributes relatively little to total PM2.5 concentration.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This article evaluates the concentrations of particulate matter (PM) and some of its chemical speciation such as sulfate, organic carbon, black carbon and sea salt particles simulated at the surface by Version 1 of the Aerosol Reanalysis of NASA's Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Application (MERRAero) over Europe.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The concentrations of coarse PM (PM10), fine PM (PM2.5), sulfate and black carbon particles are overall well simulated, despitea slight and consistentoverestimation of PM10 concentration, and a slight and consistent underestimation of PM2.5 and sulfate concentrations throughout most of the year.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The concentration of fine sea salt particles was consistently and largely overestimated, but contributes relatively little to total PM2.5 concentration.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This article evaluates the concentrations of particulate matter (PM) and some of its chemical speciation such as sulfate, organic carbon, black carbon and sea salt particles simulated at the surface by Version 1 of the Aerosol Reanalysis of NASA's Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Application (MERRAero) over Europe. Measurement data from the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme database were used. The concentrations of coarse PM (PM10), fine PM (PM2.5), sulfate and black carbon particles are overall well simulated, despitea slight and consistentoverestimation of PM10 concentration, and a slight and consistent underestimation of PM2.5 and sulfate concentrations throughout most of the year. The concentration of organic carbon was largely underestimated, especially in winter, caused by two specific monitoring stations in Italy, resulting in an overall poor performance for this particular species. After removing these two stations from the sample, the evaluation of OC substantially improved but an underestimation in winter remained. Carbon emissions originating from anthropogenic sources, such as residential wood burning inwinter, unresolved by MERRAero provide a plausible explanation for this discrepancy. The evaluation of PM2.5, sulfate and organic carbon concentrations improved during the summer. The concentration of fine sea salt particles was consistently and largely overestimated, but contributes relatively little to total PM2.5 concentration.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

PROVENÇAL, S., Buchard, V., SİLVA, A. M. D., Leduc, R., Barrette, N. (2022). Evaluation of PM surface concentrations simulated by Version 1 of NASA's MERRA Aerosol Reanalysis over Europe. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 374–382. https://ajindex.com/articles/457031

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Willmott, C.J.,1982. Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 63, 1309e1313. Tsyro, S., Aas, W., Soares, J., Sofiev, M., Berge, H., Spindler, G., 2011. Modelling of sea salt concentrations over Europe: key uncertainties and comparison with observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 10367e10388. Tørseth, K., Aas, W., Breivik, K., Fjæraa, A.M., Fiebig, M., Hjellbrekke, A.G., Lund Myhre, C., Solberg, S., Yttri, K.E., 2012. Introduction to the European monitoring and evaluation Programme (EMEP) and observed atmospheric composition change during 1972e2009. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 5447e5481. Sexton, K., Spengler, J.D., Treitman, R.D., Turner, W.A., 1984. Winter air quality in a wood-burning community: a case study in Waterbury, Vermont. Atmos. Environ. 18, 1357e1370. Seinfeld, J.H., Pandis, S.N., 1998. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: from Air Pollution to Climate Change. John Wiley, New York. Schwartz, J., Neas, L.M., 2000. Fine particles are more strongly associated than coarse particles with acute respiratory health effects in schoolchildren. Epidemiology 11, 6e10. Rienecker, M.M., Suarez, M.J., Gelaro, R., Todling, R., Bacmeister, J., Liu, E., Bosilovich, M.G., Schubert, S.D., Takacs, L., Kim, G.K., Bloom, S., Chen, J.,Collins, D., Conaty, A., da Silva, A., Gu, W., Joiner, J., Koster, R.D., Lucchesi, R., Molod, A., Owens, T., Pawson, S., Pegion, P., Redder, C.R., Reichle, R., Robertson, F.R., Ruddick,A.G., Sienkiewick, M., Woollen, J., 2011. MERRA:NASA's modern-era retrospective analysis for research and application. J. Clim. 24, 3624e3648. Rienecker, M.M., Suarez, M.J., Todling, R., Bacmeister, J., Takacs, L., Liu, H.C., Sienkiewick, M., Koster, R.D., Gelaro, R., Stajner, I., Nielsen, J.E., 2008. The GEOS5 Data Assimilation System e Documentation of Versions 5.0.1, 5.1.0, and 5.2.0. In: Technical Report Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation, vol. 27. NASA/TM-2008e104606. Remer, L.A., Kaufman, Y.J., Tanre, D., Mattoo, S., Chu, D.A., Martins, J.V., Li, R.R., Ichoku, C., Levy, R.C., Kleidman, R.G., Eck, T.F., Vermote, E., Holben, B.N., 2005. The MODIS aerosol algorithm, products, and validation. J. Atmos. Sci. 62, 947e973. Putaud, J.P., van Dingenen, R., Alastuey, A., Bauer, H., Birmili, W., Cyrys, J., Flentje, H., Fuzzi, S., Gehrig, R., Hansson, H.C., Harrison, R.M., Herrmann, H., Hitzenberger, R., Hüglin, C., Jones, A.M., Kasper-Giebl, A., Kiss, G., Kousa, A., Kuhlbusch, T.A.J., L€oschau, G., Maenhaut, W., Molnar, A