What is more, it reaches, for the non-convex weighting strategy, the“unbiasedness” of observed-forecasted scatterplot, extremely difficult to obtain.
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:We experiment some methods of sequential aggregation for forecasting PM10 concentrations for thenext day, in the context of air quality monitoring in Normandy (France).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Besides the field of applicationand the adaptation to the special context of the work of the forecaster, the main originality of this paperis that the set of experts contains at the same time statistical models built by means of various methodsand groups of predictors, as well as experts coming from deterministic chemical models of predictionmodeling pollution, weather and atmosphere.Numerical results on recent data from April 2013 until March 2015, on the whole network of fifteenmonitoring stations, illustrate and compare some various methods of aggregation.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:What is more, it reaches, for the non-convex weighting strategy, the“unbiasedness” of observed-forecasted scatterplot, extremely difficult to obtain.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2013 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri
Özet
We experiment some methods of sequential aggregation for forecasting PM10 concentrations for thenext day, in the context of air quality monitoring in Normandy (France). Besides the field of applicationand the adaptation to the special context of the work of the forecaster, the main originality of this paperis that the set of experts contains at the same time statistical models built by means of various methodsand groups of predictors, as well as experts coming from deterministic chemical models of predictionmodeling pollution, weather and atmosphere.Numerical results on recent data from April 2013 until March 2015, on the whole network of fifteenmonitoring stations, illustrate and compare some various methods of aggregation. The obtained resultsshow that such a strategy clearly improves the performances of the best expert both in terms of predictionerrors and in terms of alerts. What is more, it reaches, for the non-convex weighting strategy, the“unbiasedness” of observed-forecasted scatterplot, extremely difficult to obtain.
🔖
Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap
AUDER, B., BOBBİA, M., POGGİ, J. M., PORTİER, B. (2016). Sequential aggregation of heterogeneous experts for PM10 forecasting. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 6, 1101–1109. https://ajindex.com/articles/351426
Kaynakça (5)
Biau, G., Patra, B., 2011. Sequential quantile prediction of time series. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 57 (3), 1664e1674. Cesa-Bianchi, N., Lugosi, G., 2006.
Prediction, Learning, and Games. Cambridge University Press.
Clemen, R.T., 1989. Combining forecasts: a review and annotated bibliography. Int. J. Forecast. 5 (4), 559e583. Devaine, M., Gaillard, P., Goude, Y., Stoltz, G., 2013. Forecasting electricity consumption by aggregating specialized experts. Mach. Learn. 90 (2), 231e260. Gaillard, P., Stoltz, G., van Erven, T., 2014. A Second-order Bound with Excess Losses. ArXiv:1402.2044.
Gaillard, P., Goude, Y., 2015. Forecasting electricity consumption by aggregating experts; how to design a good set of experts. In: Modeling and Stochastic Learning for Forecasting in High Dimension, Lecture Notes in StatisticsSpringer, pp. 95e116. Ionescu, A., 2013. Prevision statistique des concentrations de particules dans l ’air: tour d’horizon des principaux outils mathematiques. Pollut. atmosph erique 217 janv-mars. http://lodel.irevues.inist.fr/pollution-atmospherique/index.php? id=873. Kukkonen, J., Olsson, T., Schultz, D.M., Baklanov, A., Klein, T., Miranda, A.I., Monteiro, A., Hirtl, M., Tarvainen, V., Boy, M., Peuch, V.-H., Poupkou, A., Kioutsioukis, I., Finardi, S., Sofiev, M., Sokhi, R., Lehtinen, K.E.J., Karatzas, K., San Jose, R., Astitha, M., Kallos, G., Schaap, M., Reimer, E., Jakobs, H., Eben, K., 2012. A review of operational, regional-scale, chemical weather forecasting models in Europe. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 1e87. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp- 12-1-2012.
Malherbe, L., Songeur, C., Honore, C., Ung, A., Meleux, F., 2012. Forecasting urban air quality over cities by statistical adaptation of deterministic chemistry transport model outputs. In: Air Pollution Modeling and its Application XXI. Springer, pp. 367e371 (Chapter 62). Mallet, V., Stoltz, G., Mauricette, B., 2009. Ozone ensemble forecast with machine learning algorithms. J. Geophys. Res. 114 (D05307). Mallet, V., 2010. Ensemble forecast of analyses. Coupling data assimilation and sequential aggregation. J. Geophys. Res. 115 (D24303). Menut, L., Bessagnet, B., Khvorostyanov, D., Beekmann, M., Blond, N., Colette, A., Coll, I., Curci, G., Foret, G., Hodzic, A., Mailler, S., Meleux, F., Monge, J.L., Pison, I., Siour, G., Turquety, S., Valari, M., Vautard, R., Vivanco, M.G., 2013. CHIMERE 2013: a model for regional atmospheric composition modelling. Geosci. Model Dev. 6, 981e1028. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194