KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2016 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 6

Atmospheric consequences of trade and human development: A case of BRIC countries

Avik SİNHA
Sudipta SEN
Sayfa
980–989
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This movement will allow them to control the ambient air pollution prevalent inthese nations.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper looks into the causal association between economic growth, CO2 emission, trade volume, andhuman development indicator for Brazil, Russia, India, and China (BRIC countries) during 1980e2013.Following a generalized method of moments (GMM) technique, we have found out that bidirectionalcausality exists between CO2 emissions and economic growth.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Feedback hypothesis is supported betweenCO2 emissions and human development, trade volume and human development, economicgrowth, and human development, and CO2 emissions and trade volume.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This movement will allow them to control the ambient air pollution prevalent inthese nations.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

This paper looks into the causal association between economic growth, CO2 emission, trade volume, andhuman development indicator for Brazil, Russia, India, and China (BRIC countries) during 1980e2013.Following a generalized method of moments (GMM) technique, we have found out that bidirectionalcausality exists between CO2 emissions and economic growth. Feedback hypothesis is supported betweenCO2 emissions and human development, trade volume and human development, economicgrowth, and human development, and CO2 emissions and trade volume. Apart from finding out theunidirectional association from trade volume to economic growth, this study also validated the existenceof Environmental Kuznets curve. Empirical findings of the study substantiate that the policymakers ofthe BRIC nations must focus on the green energy initiatives, either by in-house development or bytechnology transfer. This movement will allow them to control the ambient air pollution prevalent inthese nations.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SİNHA, A., SEN, S. (2016). Atmospheric consequences of trade and human development: A case of BRIC countries. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 6, 980–989. https://ajindex.com/articles/351388

Kaynakça (2)

  1. Aizenman, J., Noy, I., 2006. FDI and trade e two-way linkages? Q. Rev. Econ. Finance 46 (3), 317e337. Ardichvili, A., Zavyalova, E., Minina, V., 2012. Human capital development: comparative analysis of BRICs. Eur. J. Train. Dev. 36 (2/3), 213e233. Azahaf, N., Schraad-Tischler, D., 2012. Governance Capacities in the BRICS. Bertelsmann Stiftung. Retrieved from. http://www.sgi-network.org/brics/?
  2. GovernanceCapacities. Azomahou, T., Laisney, F., Van, P.N., 2006. Economic development and CO 2 emissions: a nonparametric panel approach. J. Pub. Econ. 90 (6), 1347e1363. Barro, R., 1996. Health and Economic Growth. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Belloumi, M., 2009. Energy consumption and GDP in Tunisia: cointegration and causality analysis. Energy Pol 37 (7), 2745e2753. Ben-David, D., 1993. Equalizing exchange: trade liberalization and income convergence. Q. J. Econ. 108 (3), 653e679. Bhagwati, J., Daly, H., 1993. Debate: does free trade harm the environment? Sci. Am. 269 (5), 17e29. Bhargava, A., Jamison, D.T., Lau, L.J., Murray, C.J., 2001. Modeling the effects of health on economic growth. J. Health Econ. 20 (3), 423e440. Bloom, D.E., Canning, D., Sevilla, J., 2004. The effect of health on economic growth: a production function approach. World Dev. 32 (1), 1e13. Bogin, B., Silva, M.I.V., Rios, L., 2007. Life history trade e offs in human growth: adaptation or pathology? Am. J. Hum. Biol. 19 (5), 631e642. Çakır, M.Y., Kabundi, A., 2013. Trade shocks from BRIC to South Africa: a global VAR analysis. Econ. Model. 32, 190e202. Caviglia-Harris, J.L., Chambers, D., Kahn, J.R., 2009. Taking the “U” out of Kuznets: a comprehensive analysis of the EKC and environmental degradation. Ecol. Econ. 68 (4), 1149e1159. Chakravarty, D., Mandal, S.K., 2016. Estimating the relationship between economic growth and environmental quality for the brics economies-a dynamic panel data approach. J. Dev. Areas 50 (5), 119e130. Chontanawat, J., Hunt, L.C., Pierse, R., 2008. Does energy consumption cause economic growth?: evidence from a systematic study of over 100 countries. J. Policy Model. 30 (2), 209e220. Cowan, W.N., Chang, T., Inglesi-Lotz, R., Gupta, R., 2014. The nexus of electricity consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in the BRICS countries. Energy Policy 66, 359e368. Davies, A., Quinlivan, G., 2006. A panel data analysis of the impact of trade on human development. J. Socio-Economics 35 (5), 868e876. De Castro, T., 2012. Trade cooperation indicators: development of