Dergiler / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2017 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

Direct effect of atmospheric turbulence on plume rise in a neutral atmosphere

Sayfa
640–651
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The quantile-quantile plots show that the new model can predict the simulated plume rise with a deviation factor of 1.0025 whereas the conventional models overestimate the final plume rise at least by a factor of 2.2.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The directeffectof atmospheric turbulence onplume rise in the currentresearchworkis studied through examining the turbulence intensity parameter.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The sensitivity analysis showed that by increasing the atmospheric turbulence intensity, the final plume rise decreases because of the updraft and downdraft motions of turbulence and it has been found that there is a linear dependency between the plume rise and (IAir)1.22.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The quantile-quantile plots show that the new model can predict the simulated plume rise with a deviation factor of 1.0025 whereas the conventional models overestimate the final plume rise at least by a factor of 2.2.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

The directeffectof atmospheric turbulence onplume rise in the currentresearchworkis studied through examining the turbulence intensity parameter. A hybrid unsteady Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) and large eddy simulation (LES) numerical approach is applied with a new mixed scale sub-grid parameterization technique in the commercial ANSYS Fluent software in order to simulate the buoyant plume behavior in a turbulent crossflow. The accuracy of the simulation method is crosschecked against the wind tunnel data available in the literature. The numerical simulation results in various operating conditions are used to derive a new plume rise formula in which the direct effect of atmospheric turbulence intensityat stack height (IAir) is explicitlyintroduced in the plume rise formula. Furthermore, the buoyancy parameter of the flue gas is determined at some distances upstream of the stack top surface to include the whole effects of source buoyancy on the plume rise. The value of IAir at stack height is obtained by measuring the standard deviation of wind velocity at stack height. The sensitivity analysis showed that by increasing the atmospheric turbulence intensity, the final plume rise decreases because of the updraft and downdraft motions of turbulence and it has been found that there is a linear dependency between the plume rise and (IAir)1.22. The quantile-quantile plots show that the new model can predict the simulated plume rise with a deviation factor of 1.0025 whereas the conventional models overestimate the final plume rise at least by a factor of 2.2.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ASHRAFİ, K., ORKOMİ, A. A., MOTLAGH, M. S. (2017). Direct effect of atmospheric turbulence on plume rise in a neutral atmosphere. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 640–651. https://ajindex.com/articles/351383

Kaynakça (3)

  1. Albani, R.A., Duda, F.P., Pimentel, L.C.G., 2015. On the modeling of atmospheric pollutant dispersion during a diurnal cycle: a finite element study. Atmos. Environ. 118, 19e27. Berkowicz, R., Prahm, L.P., 1982. Evaluation of the profile method for estimation of surface fluxes of momentum and heat. Atmos. Environ. 16 (12), 2809e2819. Blackadar, A.K., Tennekes, H., 1968. Asymptotic similarity in neutral barotropic planetary boundary layers. J. Atmos. Sci. 25 (6), 1015e1020. Blocken, B., Stathopoulos, T., Carmeliet, J., 2007. CFD simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer: wall function problems. Atmos. Environ. 41, 238e252. Blocken, B., Stathopoulos, T., Saathoff, P., Wang, X., 2008. Numerical evaluation of pollutant dispersion in the built environment: comparisons between models and experiments. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 96 (10), 1817e1831. Bosanquet, C.H., 1957. The rise of a hot waste gas plume. J. Inst. Fuel 30 (197), 322e328. Boussinesq, J., 1877. Theorie de l’Ecoulement Tourbillant Savants. Mem. Present es Divers Acad. Sci. institute Fr. 23, 46e50. Briggs, G.A., 1965. A plume rise model compared with observations. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 15 (9), 433e438. Briggs, G., 1969.
  2. Plume Rise, AEC Critical Review Series. TID-25075, pp. 68e86. Briggs, G.A., 1975. Plume rise predictions. In: AMS Workshop on Meteorology and Environmental Assessment, Boston, 29 September-30 October 1975.
  3. Briggs, G.A., 1984. Plume rise and buoyancy effects. Atmos. Sci. Power Prod. 327e366. Carson, J.E., Moses, H.,1969. The validity of several plume rise formulas. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 19 (11), 862e866. Chu, V.H., Goldberg, M.B.,1974. Buoyant forced-plumes in cross flow. J. Hydraul.Div. 100 (9), 1203e1214. Davidson, W., 1949. The Dispersion and Spreading of Gases and Dusts from Chimneys. Industrial Hygiene Foundation, Pittsburgh. Decrop, B., Mulder, T.De, Toorman, E., Sas, M., 2015. Large-eddy simulations of turbidity plumes in crossflow. Eur. J. Mech. B-Fluid 53, 68e84. EPA, 1994. Test Method 1A: Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources with Small Stacks or Ducts, 40 CFR part 60 appendix A. Government Institutes Inc., Rockville, MD. Erbrink, H.J., 1994. Plume rise in different atmospheres: a practical scheme and some comparisons with LIDAR measurements. Atmos. Environ. 28 (22), 3625e3636. Ferziger, J.H., Clark, R.A., Reynolds, W.C., 1977. Evaluation of Subgrid-Scale Turbulence Models Using a Fully Simulated Turbulent Flow. Thermosciences Division, Dept. Mech.