Dergiler / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2016 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

An urban scale application and validation of the CALPUFF model

Sayfa
393–402
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The good performance of the model is shown for the annual meanpredictions, while the temporal agreement of the short-term, 1-h average concentrations is much lessaccurate, especially for the low-wind meteorological episodes

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The paper presents selected results of an urban scale analysis of air quality.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Calculations are carried outfor the Warsaw area, basing on the emission and meteorological dataset for the year 2012.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The good performance of the model is shown for the annual meanpredictions, while the temporal agreement of the short-term, 1-h average concentrations is much lessaccurate, especially for the low-wind meteorological episodes
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2012 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

The paper presents selected results of an urban scale analysis of air quality. Calculations are carried outfor the Warsaw area, basing on the emission and meteorological dataset for the year 2012. The regionalscale CALMET/CALPUFF modeling system has been used to link the emission data with the resultingconcentration maps of the selected polluting substances that characterize the urban atmospheric environment:PM10, PM2.5, NOx, SO2, CO, C6H6. The emission field encompasses the basic activities in an urbanarea: the energy sector, industry, traffic and the municipal sector. The basic simulation results present theannual mean concentrations of pollutants at the receptor points and indicate the areas where air qualitylimits are exceeded. The presentation is focused on the assessment of the model performance. Thecalculated annual mean concentrations are verified against the measurement data at 5 monitoringstations. Moreover, for selected modeling periods (January 2012), performance estimates are also presentedfor 1-h concentration results. The good performance of the model is shown for the annual meanpredictions, while the temporal agreement of the short-term, 1-h average concentrations is much lessaccurate, especially for the low-wind meteorological episodes

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

HOLNİCKİ, P., KAŁUSZKO, A., TRAPP, W. (2016). An urban scale application and validation of the CALPUFF model. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 393–402. https://ajindex.com/articles/351378

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Brode, W.R., 2012. CALPUFF Near-field Validation. 10th Conference on Air Quality Modeling. Research Triangle Park, NC. March 13, 012. www.epa.gov/scram001/ 10thmodconfpres.htm. Buchholz, S., Krein, A., Junk, J., Heinemann, G., Hoffmann, L., 2013. Simulation of urban-scale air pollution patterns in Luxembourg: contributing sources and emission scenarios. Environ. Model. Assess. 18, 271e283. Bussini, V., Capelli, L., Sironi, S., Nano, G., Rossi, A.N., Bonati, S., 2012. Comparison of CALPUFF and AERMOD models for odour dispersion simulation. Chem. Eng. Trans. 30, 205e210. CAFE, 2008. In: Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on Ambient Air Quality and Cleaner Air for Europe. Calori, G., Clemente, M., De Maria, R., Finardi, S., Lollobrigida, F., Tinarelli, G., 2006. Air quality integrated modelling in Turin urban area. Environ. Model. Softw. 21, 468e476. Carnevale, C., Finzi, G., Pisoni, E., Volta, M., Guariso, G., Gianfreda, R., Maffeis, G., Thunis, P., White, L., Triacchini, G., 2012. An integrated assessment tool to define effective air quality policies at regional scale. Environ. Model. Softw. 38, 306e315. Chang, J.C., Hanna, S.R., 2004. Air quality model performance evaluation. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 87, 167e196. Dernwent, D., Fraser, A., Abott, J., Jenkin, M., Willis, P., Murrells, T., 2010. Evaluating the Performance of Air Quality Models, No 3. June 2010. http://naei.defra.gov. uk/reports?report_id¼616. Dresser, A.L., Huizer, R.D., 2011. CALPUFF and AERMOD model validation study in the near field: Martins Creek revisited. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 61, 641e657. Elbir, T., 2003. Comparison of model predictions with the data of an urban air quality monitoring network in Izmir, Turkey. Atmos. Environ. 37, 2149e2157. Escoffier, Ch, 2013. CALPUFF model overview and some applications. In: DMUG Meeting, St Martin in the Fields, London, 9 Dec. 2013. iaqm.co.uk/download/ CEscoffier_DMUG2013.pdf. ETC/ACM, 2011. Technical paper 2011/9. In: Malherbe, L., Ung, A., Colette, A., Derby, E. (Eds.), Formulation and Quantification of Uncertainties in Air Quality Mapping. ETC/ACM, 2013. Technical paper 2013/11. In: Rouil, R., Bessagnet, B. (Eds.), How to Start with PM Modelling for Air Quality Assessment and Planning Relevant to AQD. Fox, T.J., 2012. CALPUFF status and update. In: 2012 R/S/L Modelers Workshop. April 30, 2012. http://www.cleanairinfo.com/regionalstatelocalmodelingworkshop/ archive/2012/presentations/2-5_CALPUFFst