Dergiler / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2017 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Prediction of airborne nanoparticles at roadside location using a feedeforward artificial neural network

Sayfa
446–454
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The model could be further used for other locations in Kuwait and elsewhere after adequate longeterm measurements and training based on the routinelyemonitored environmental data.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Accurate prediction of nanoparticles is essential to provide adequate mitigation strategies for air quality management.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:On the contrary to PM10, SO2, O3, NOx and CO, nanoparticles are not routinelyemonitored by environmental agencies as they are not regulated yet.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The model could be further used for other locations in Kuwait and elsewhere after adequate longeterm measurements and training based on the routinelyemonitored environmental data.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Accurate prediction of nanoparticles is essential to provide adequate mitigation strategies for air quality management. On the contrary to PM10, SO2, O3, NOx and CO, nanoparticles are not routinelyemonitored by environmental agencies as they are not regulated yet. Therefore, a prognostic supervised machine learning technique, namely feedeforward artificial neural network (ANN), has been used with a back epropagation algorithm, to stochastically predict PNCs in three size ranges (N5e30, N30e100 and N100 e300 nm). Seven models, covering a total of 525 simulations, were considered using different combina-tions of the routinelyemeasured meteorological and five pollutants variables as covariates. Each model included different numbers of hidden layers and neurons per layer in each simulation. Results of sim-ulations were evaluated to achieve the optimum correspondence between the measured and predicted PNCs in each model (namely Models, M1eM7). The best prediction ability was provided by M1 when all the covariate variables were used. The model, M2, provided the lowest prediction performance since all the meteorological variables were omitted in this model. Models, M3eM7, that omitted one pollutant covariate, showed prediction ability similar to M1. The results were within a factor of 2 from the measured values, and provided adequate solutions to PNCs' prognostic demands. These models are useful, particularly for the studied site where no nanoparticles measurement equipment exist, for determining the levels of particles in various size ranges. The model could be further used for other locations in Kuwait and elsewhere after adequate longeterm measurements and training based on the routinelyemonitored environmental data.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AleDabbous, A. N., Kumar, P., Khan, A. R. (2017). Prediction of airborne nanoparticles at roadside location using a feedeforward artificial neural network. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 446–454. https://ajindex.com/articles/351373

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Zhang, G., Patuwo, B.E., Hu, M.Y., 1998. Forecasting with artificial neural networks:: the state of the art. Int. J. Forecast. 14, 35e62. Willmott, C.J., 1982. Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bull. Am. Meteorological Soc. 63, 1309e1313. Svozil, D., Kvasnicka, V., Pospichal, J., 1997. Introduction to multi-layer feed-forward neural networks. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 39, 43e62. Sabaliauskas, K., Jeong, C.-H., Yao, X., Jun, Y.-S., Jadidian, P., Evans, G.J., 2012. Five-year roadside measurements of ultrafine particles in a major Canadian city. Atmos. Environ. 49, 245e256. Robbins, H., Monro, S., 1951. A stochastic approximation method. Ann. Math. Stat. 400e407. Reggente, M., Peters, J., Theunis, J., Van Poppel, M., Rademaker, M., Kumar, P., De Baets, B., 2014. Prediction of ultrafine particle number concentrations in urban environments by means of Gaussian process regression based on measure-ments of oxides of nitrogen. Environ. Model. Softw. 61, 135e150. Perez, P., Trier, A., 2001. Prediction of NO and NO 2 concentrations near a street with heavy traffic in Santiago, Chile. Atmos. Environ. 35, 1783e1789. Paschalidou, A.K., Karakitsios, S., Kleanthous, S., Kassomenos, P.A., 2011. Forecasting hourly PM10 concentration in Cyprus through artificial neural networks and multiple regression models: implications to local environmental management. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 18, 316e327. Ozdemir, U., Taner, S., 2014. Impacts of meteorological factors on PM10: artificial neural networks (ANN) and multiple linear regression (MLR) approaches. En-viron. Forensics 15, 329e336. Nagendra, S.S., Khare, M., 2006. Artificial neural network approach for modelling nitrogen dioxide dispersion from vehicular exhaust emissions. Ecol. Model. 190, 99e115. Moustris, K.P., Ziomas, I.C., Paliatsos, A.G., 2010. 3-Day-ahead forecasting of regional pollution index for the pollutants NO2, CO, SO2, and O3 using artificial neural networks in Athens, Greece. Water Air Soil Pollut. 209, 29e43. Morawska, L., Ristovski, Z., Jayaratne, E., Keogh, D.U., Ling, X., 2008. Ambient nano and ultrafine particles from motor vehicle emissions: characteristics, ambient processing and implications on human exposure. Atmos. Environ. 42, 8113e8138. Mølgaard, B., Hussein, T., Corander, J., Hameri,€ K., 2012. Forecasting size-fractionated particle number concentrations in the urban atmosphere. Atmos. Environ. 46, 155e163. McKendry, I.G., 2002. Evaluation of artificial neural networks for fin