Dergiler / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 12

Monitoring of hydrogen sulfide concentration in the atmosphere near two geothermal power plants of Turkey

Sayfa
2317–2326
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The concentrations were determined as 0.61 μg m−3 and 0.60 μg m−3 in the background area.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study was designed to measure H2S concentrations near GPPs in Aydin and Manisa over different time intervals to address potential health hazards and odor problems for human populations.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Measurements of H2S concentrations with a Radiello® and Thermo 450i® were carried out in a GPP (25 MWe) in Aydin, Turkey.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The concentrations were determined as 0.61 μg m−3 and 0.60 μg m−3 in the background area.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2019 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

This study was designed to measure H2S concentrations near GPPs in Aydin and Manisa over different time intervals to address potential health hazards and odor problems for human populations. Measurements of H2S concentrations with a Radiello® and Thermo 450i® were carried out in a GPP (25 MWe) in Aydin, Turkey. The exposure times of the Radiello® were selected based on the ambient air quality standards suggested by WHO, Turkey and Iceland legislations. The 30 min average concentration remained below the detection limit of the Radiello®. The 14 days average concentration measured by Thermo®450i was 52.5 μg m−3 while the same concentration measured by Radiello® was 51.40 ± 0.30 μg m−3. H2S concentrations measured by Thermo®450i and Radiello® were lower than the limit reported by WHO (100 μg m−3). Both the passive sampling and continuous measurement values were consistent for H2S and were commonly expressed as concentrations averaged over specific time intervals. However, when the sampling periods exceeded 14 days, differences began to occur between passive sampling and continuous measurements. For monitoring of H2S concentrations near two GPPs, additional sampling was carried out from July 15–29, 2019 in Aydin (6 sites), and during April 12–16, 2019 (1st period) and April 26 to May 10, 2019 (2nd period) in Manisa (10 sites), as well as in a background area (1 site). The air H2S concentrations in Aydin and Manisa, where the power plants are concentrated, ranged 11.2–66.7 μg m−3. The concentrations were determined as 0.61 μg m−3 and 0.60 μg m−3 in the background area.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DUMANOĞLU, Y. (2020). Monitoring of hydrogen sulfide concentration in the atmosphere near two geothermal power plants of Turkey. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 12, 2317–2326. https://ajindex.com/articles/351274

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Aguilar-Dodiera, L.C., Castillo, J.E., Quintana, P.J.E., Montoya, L.D., Molinad, L.T., Zavalad, M., Almanza-Velozd, V., Rodríguez-Ventura, J.G., 2020. Spatial and temporal evaluation of H2S, SO2 and NH3 concentrations near Cerro Prieto geothermal power plant in Mexico. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 11, 94–104.
  2. Aiuppa, A., Franco, A., von Glasow, R., Allen, A.G., D'Alessandro, W., Mather, T.A., Pyle, D.M., Valenza, M., 2007. The tropospheric processing of acidic gases and hydrogen sulphide in volcanic gas plumes as inferred from field and model investigations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 7, 1441–1450.
  3. Arslan, S., Darici, M., Karahan, C., 2001. Turkiye’nin Jeotermal Enerji Potansiyeli. V. Ulusal Tesisat Muhendisligi Kongresi Ve Sergisi, Jeotermal Enerji Semineri Bildiriler Kitabı. 03-06 October 2001, Izmir. Barbier, 1997. Nature and technology of geothermal energy: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 1, 1–69.
  4. Bates, M.N., Garrett, N., Crane, J., Balmes, J.R., 2013. Associations of ambient hydrogen sulfide exposure with self-reported asthma and asthma symptoms. Environ. Res. 122, 81–87.
  5. Bates, M.N., Bailey, I.L., DiMartino, R.B., Pope, K., Crane, J., Garrent, N., 2017. Lens opacity and hydrogen sulfide in a New Zealand geothermal area. Optom. Vis. Sci. 94 (4), 487–495.
  6. Bravi, M., Basosi, R., 2014. Environmental impact of electricity from selected geothermal power plants in Italy. J. Clean. Prod. 66, 301–308.
  7. Cabassi, J., Tassi, F., Venturi, S., Calabrese, S., Capecchiacci, F., D'Alessandro, W., Vaselli, O., 2017. A new approach for the measurement of gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) and H2S in air from anthropogenic and natural sources: examples from Mt. Amiata (Siena, Central Italy) and Solfatara Crater (Campi Flegrei, Southern Italy). J. Geochem. Explor. 175, 48–58.
  8. Campos, V.P., Cruz, L.P.S., Godoi, R.H.M., Godoi, A.F.L., Tavares, T.M., 2010. Development and validation of passive samplers for atmospheric monitoring of SO2, NO2, O3 and H2S in tropical areas. Microchem. J. 96, 132–138.
  9. Canik, B., Celik, M., Arigun, Z., 2000. Jeotermal Enerji. Ankara Universitesi Fen Fakultesi Doner Sermaye Isletmesi Yayinlari No:59. Mayis 2000. CARB, 2016. California Air Resources Board Regulation 9 Inorganic Gaseous Pollutants Rule 5 Hydrogen Sulfide. From: Geothermal Power Plants Index. Carlsen, H.K., Zoega, H., Valdimarsdottir, U., Gislason, T., 2012. Hydrogen sulfide and particle matter levels associated with increased dispensing of anti-asthma drugs in Iceland's capital. Environ. Res. 11