KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Emission factors and global warming potential of various solid biomass fuel-cook stove combinations

Maninder KAUR-SİDHU
Khaiwal RAVİNDRA
Suman MOR
Siby JOHN
Sayfa
252–260
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Mitigating GHGemissions by adoption of SBF based improved cookstoves alone is not possible to attain the target health goals.Hence, to minimize the emission factors and maximize the amount of energy supplied, this study emphasizes toexplore the sustainable energy planning strategies and by extending the scope of clean fuels to reduce GHGemissions

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Solid biomass fuel-SBF combustion is known to be the second-largest source of carbon emissions, which alsoleads to adverse environment and health implications.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This was done by experimentally conducting water boiling test (WBT) for various fuel types such asliquefied petroleum gas (LPG), kerosene,acaciawood,Mangifera Indica(mango wood) and cowdung cake.Emissions of carbon monoxide (CO) and carbon dioxide (CO2) were measured during WBT.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Mitigating GHGemissions by adoption of SBF based improved cookstoves alone is not possible to attain the target health goals.Hence, to minimize the emission factors and maximize the amount of energy supplied, this study emphasizes toexplore the sustainable energy planning strategies and by extending the scope of clean fuels to reduce GHGemissions
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Solid biomass fuel-SBF combustion is known to be the second-largest source of carbon emissions, which alsoleads to adverse environment and health implications. The study evaluated the emission factors and non-carbondioxide greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for various types of fuel-stove combinations used for cooking purposesin Punjab, India. Most commonly used fuel types in the study area were chosen for the combustion emissionsestimation. This was done by experimentally conducting water boiling test (WBT) for various fuel types such asliquefied petroleum gas (LPG), kerosene,acaciawood,Mangifera Indica(mango wood) and cowdung cake.Emissions of carbon monoxide (CO) and carbon dioxide (CO2) were measured during WBT. Carbon balanceequations were developed and Global warming impact index (GWI) of biomass fuels was also calculated. GWI forLPG, kerosene,acaciawood,Mangifera Indica(mango wood) and cowdung cake were found to be 16, 62.4,341.4, 429.8 and 575.1 CO2-equivalent (CO2-e), respectively, in the time horizon of 20 years. The results showthat LPG mitigates about 559 of CO2-e, thus reducing GHG emissions andfindings suggest that amongst all thetested fuel types, traditional cookstove with cowdung cake as fuel was the worst performer. Mitigating GHGemissions by adoption of SBF based improved cookstoves alone is not possible to attain the target health goals.Hence, to minimize the emission factors and maximize the amount of energy supplied, this study emphasizes toexplore the sustainable energy planning strategies and by extending the scope of clean fuels to reduce GHGemissions

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KAUR-SİDHU, M., RAVİNDRA, K., MOR, S., JOHN, S. (2020). Emission factors and global warming potential of various solid biomass fuel-cook stove combinations. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 252–260. https://ajindex.com/articles/351270

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Ahuja, D.R., Joshi, V., Smith, K.R., Venkataraman, C., 1987. Thermal performance andemission characteristics of unvented biomass-burning cookstoves. A Proposed Stand.Method Eval. (12), 247–270
  2. Biomass.Arora, P., Das, P., Jain, S., Kishore, V.V.N., 2014. A laboratory-based comparative studyof Indian biomass cookstove testing protocol and Water Boiling Test. Energy Sustain.Dev. 21, 81–88.
  3. Bailis, R., Pennise, D., Ezzati, M., Kammen, D.M., Kituyi, E., 2004. Impacts of GreenhouseGas and Particulate Emissions from Woodfuel Production and End-Use in Sub-sa-haran Africa. Renewable and Appropriate Energy Laboratory, Berkeley, CA. Balakrishnan, K., 2018. Fueling clean household environments. EcoHealth 15 (4),876–877.
  4. Ballard-Tremeer, G., Jawurek, H.H., 1996. Comparison offive rural, wood‐burningcooking devices: efficiencies and emissions. Biomass Bioenergy 11 (5), 419‐30. Bansal, O., Singh, A., Singh, D., 2019. Characteristics of Black Carbon aerosols overPatiala Northwestern part of the IGP: source apportionment using cluster and CWT analysis. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 10 (1), 244–256.
  5. Bartington, S.E., et al., 2017. Patterns of domestic exposure to carbon monoxide andparticulate matter in households using biomass fuel in Janakpur, Nepal. Environ.Pollut. 220, 38–45.
  6. Bhattacharya, S.C., Leon, M.A., Rahman, M.M., 2002. A study on improved biomassbriquetting. Energy Sustain. Dev. 6 (2), 67–71.BIS, 1991. Indian Standard Portable Solid Bio-Mass Cookstove. (Chulha) Part 1 [Firstrevision of 13152(Part 1):1991].
  7. Brooks, N., Bhojvaid, V., Jeuland, M.A., Lewis, J.J., Patange, O., Pattanayak, S.K., 2016.How much do alternative cookstoves reduce biomass fuel use? Evidence from NorthIndia. Resour. Energy Econ. 43, 153–171.
  8. Butcher, S.S., Rao, U., Smith, K.R., Osborn, J.E., Azuma, P., Fields, H., 1984. EmissionFactors and Efficiencies for Small Scale Open Biomass Combustion: toward StandardMeasurement Techniques. Meeting of the American Chemical Society,Washington, DC. Clasen, T., Smith, K.R., 2019. Let the“a”in WASH stand for air: integrating research andinterventions to improve household air pollution (HAP) and water, sanitation andhygiene (WaSH) in low-income settings. Environ. Health Perspect. 127 (2), 025001. Chowdhury, S., Dey, S., Guttikunda, S., Pillarisetti, A., Smith, K.R., Di Girolamo, L., 2019.Indian annual ambient air quality standard is achievable by completely mitigatingemissions from household sources. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116 (22), 10711–10716.
  9. De la Sota, C., Vian