Dergiler / Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri / 2015 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4

Performance and Difficulties of Students in Formulating and Solving Quadratic Equations with One Unknown

Sayfa
1137–1152
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Thus, it is concluded that the differences in the structural properties of the symbolic equations and word problem representations affected student performance in formulating and solving quadratic equations with one unknown

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study attempts to investigate the performance of tenth-grade students in solving quadratic equations with one unknown, using symbolic equation and word-problem representations.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The participants were 217 tenth-grade students, from three different public high schools.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Thus, it is concluded that the differences in the structural properties of the symbolic equations and word problem representations affected student performance in formulating and solving quadratic equations with one unknown
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This study attempts to investigate the performance of tenth-grade students in solving quadratic equations with one unknown, using symbolic equation and word-problem representations. The participants were 217 tenth-grade students, from three different public high schools. Data was collected through an open-ended questionnaire comprising eight symbolic equations and four word problems; furthermore, semi-structured interviews were conducted with sixteen of the students. In the data analysis, the percentage of the students' correct, incorrect, blank, and incomplete responses was determined to obtain an overview of student performance in solving symbolic equations and word problems. In addition, the students' written responses and interview data were qualitatively analyzed to determine the nature of the students' difficulties in formulating and solving quadratic equations. The findings revealed that although students have difficulties in solving both symbolic quadratic equations and quadratic word problems, they performed better in the context of symbolic equations compared with word problems. Student difficulties in solving symbolic problems were mainly associated with arithmetic and algebraic manipulation errors. In the word problems, however, students had difficulties comprehending the context and were therefore unable to formulate the equation to be solved. Thus, it is concluded that the differences in the structural properties of the symbolic equations and word problem representations affected student performance in formulating and solving quadratic equations with one unknown

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KABAR, M. G. D., ERBAŞ, A. K. (2015). Performance and Difficulties of Students in Formulating and Solving Quadratic Equations with One Unknown. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4, 1137–1152. https://ajindex.com/articles/346166

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Allaire, P., & Bradley, E. R. (2001). Geometric approaches to quadratic equations from other times and places. Math- ematics Teacher, 94(4), 308-313. Bossé, M. J., & Nandakumar, N. R. (2005). The factorability of quadratics: Motivation for more techniques. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 24(4), 143-153.
  2. Briars, D. J., & Larkin, J. H. (1984). An integrated model of skill in solving elementary word problems. Cognition and Instruction, 1(3), 245-296.
  3. Clark, M. K. (2012). History of mathematics: Illuminat- ing understanding of school mathematics concepts for prospective mathematics teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81, 67-84.
  4. Clement, J. (1982). Algebra word problem solutions thought processes underlying a common misconception. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 13(1), -30. Cummins, D. D., Kintsch, W., Reusser, K., & Weimer, R. (1988). The role of understanding in solving word prob- lems. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 405-438.
  5. Erbaş, A. K., Çetinkaya, B., & Ersoy, Y. (2009). Öğrencile- rin basit doğrusal denklemlerin çözümünde karşılaştıkları güçlükler ve kavram yanılgıları [Student difficulties and misconceptions in solving simple linear equations]. Edu- cation and Science, 34(152), 44-59.
  6. Hinsley, D. A., Hayes, J. R., & Simon, H. A. (1977). From words to equations: Meaning and representation in alge- bra word problems. In P. A. Carpenter, & M. A. Just (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension (pp. 89-10).
  7. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates. Katz, V., & Barton, B. (2007). Stages in the history of alge- bra with implications for teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 185-201.
  8. Kieran, C. (1992). Learning and teaching algebra at the middle school through college levels. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teach- ing and learning (pp. 390-419).
  9. New York, NY: Macmillan. Koedinger, K. R., & Nathan, M. J. (2004). The real story behind story problems: Effects of representations on quan- titative reasoning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, (2), 129-164.
  10. Kotsopoulos, D. (2007). Unravelling student challenges with quadratics: A cognitive approach. Australian Mathe- matics Teacher, 63(2), 19-24.
  11. Lima, R. N. (2008, July). Procedural embodiment and quadratic equations. Paper presented at the 11th Interna- tional Congress on Mathematical Education (ICME-11), Monterrey, México. Retrieved from http://homepages. warwick.ac.uk/staff/David.Tall/pdfs/dot2010x-lima-qua- dratics-draft.pdf Lithne