What Does It Mean To Be a Student in Different Types of High Schools in Turkey through the Eyes of Students?

The cores that were revealed as a result of the analysis were consolidated under two main themes: "who the students think they are" and "how they differ themselves from other students."

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯

Amaç & Hipotez:Being a student describes a multi-component reality with both individualistic and social inclusions.

📊

Temel Bulgular & Veri:Semistructured, personal, face-to-face interviews were conducted with 96 eleventh graders from six different types of high schools (eight girls and eight boys from each type of high school: science, Anatolian, vocational and technical Anatolian, fine arts, social sciences, and Anatolian imam and preacher high schools) from the central districts of Ankara.

💡

Sonuç & Katkı:The cores that were revealed as a result of the analysis were consolidated under two main themes: "who the students think they are" and "how they differ themselves from other students."

🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi

📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem

⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Being a student describes a multi-component reality with both individualistic and social inclusions. How this reality is established and how subjects position themselves in their current educational environments historically, culturally, and sociologically are one of the most controversial topics of educational sciences. Therefore, this study investigates what it means to be a student in different types of high schools in Turkey through students' eyes. This study was conducted using a phenomenological design, one of the qualitative research designs. Convenience sampling was used to determine which schools and which types of schools would take part in the study. Semistructured, personal, face-to-face interviews were conducted with 96 eleventh graders from six different types of high schools (eight girls and eight boys from each type of high school: science, Anatolian, vocational and technical Anatolian, fine arts, social sciences, and Anatolian imam and preacher high schools) from the central districts of Ankara. The data was analyzed using the phenomenological analysis method in order to reach the core that turns different experiences into commonalities. The cores that were revealed as a result of the analysis were consolidated under two main themes: "who the students think they are" and "how they differ themselves from other students."

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SEVER, M., SOĞUKSU, A. F., TÜRE, E., KOÇMAR, Y., OLĞUN, M., ALTUĞ, N. Ü., ÖZTÜRK, İ. (2016). What Does It Mean To Be a Student in Different Types of High Schools in Turkey through the Eyes of Students?. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 231–259. https://ajindex.com/articles/346033

Kaynakça (8)

Aksoy, H. H., Özden-Aras, H., Çankaya, D., & Kayahan-Karakul, A. (2011). Eğitimde nitelik: Eğitim ekonomisi kuramlarının eğitimin niteliğine ilişkin kurgusunun eleştirel analizi [Quality in education: Critical analysis of fiction related to the theory of educational economics]. Eğitim Bilim Toplum, 33(9), 60-99.
Al-Fayez, G. A., Ohaeri, J. U., & Gado, O. M. (2012). Prevalence of physical, psychological, and sexual abuse among a nationwide sample of Arab high school students: Association with family characteristics, anxiety, depression, self-esteem, and quality of life. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 47, 53-66.
Altunçekiç, A., Yaman, S., & Koray, Ö. (2005). Öğretmen adaylarının öz-yeterlik inanç düzeyleri ve problem çözme becerileri üzerine bir araştırma (Kastamonu ili örneği) [Self- efficacy and problem-solving skill levels of teacher candidates (Kastamonu sample)]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 13(1), 93-102.
Anyon, J. (1980). Social class and the hidden curriculum of work. Journal of Education, 162(1), 67-92.
Anyon, J. (1983). Intersections of gender and class: Accommodation and resistance by working-class and affluent females to contradictory sex-role. In S. Walker & L. Barton (Eds.), Gender, class and education (pp. 19-38). Lewes: Falmer. Arnot, M. (2002). Reproducing gender? Essays on educational theory and feminist politics. London, UK: Routledge. Berberoğlu, G., & Kalender, İ. (2005). Öğrenci başarısının yıllara, okul türlerine, bölgelere göre incelenmesi: ÖSS ve PISA analizi [An examination of student success according to year, school type, and region: OSS and PISA analysis]. Eğitim Bilimleri ve Uygulama, 4(7), 21-35.
Berg, B. L. (1998). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Bernstein-Yamashiro, B. (2004). Learning relationships: Teacher-student connections, learning, and identity in high school. New Directions for Youth Development, 103, 55-70.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). Distinction- A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Boxer, P., Goldstein, S. E., DeLorenzo, T., Savoy, S., & Mercado, I. (2011). Educational aspiration - expectation discrepancies: Relation to socioeconomic and academic risk- related factors. Journal of Adolescenc