Dergiler / Türk Üstün Zeka ve Eğitim Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Toward A New Era of Gifted Education: Principles, Policies, and Strategies

Üstün Yetenekliler Eğitiminde Yeni Bir Döneme Doğru: İlkeler, Yasalar ve Stratejiler

Sayfa
2–15
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

At the social and organizational level, with appropriate centralized control, more locally initiated education and development efforts can be harnessed to build a distributed network system of support that is more responsive to needs for advanced learning, talent development, and excellence in the 21st century.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Gifted education as we know and practice is by and large the product of early 20th century.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this paper, I am arguing for a paradigm shift in gifted education to make it more responsive to the challenges of the 21st century, as well as new opportunities for optimal development of many children and adolescents, rather than exclusively focusing on the identified and selected few (often in a once-and-for-all fashion).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:At the social and organizational level, with appropriate centralized control, more locally initiated education and development efforts can be harnessed to build a distributed network system of support that is more responsive to needs for advanced learning, talent development, and excellence in the 21st century.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Gifted education as we know and practice is by and large the product of early 20th century. In this paper, I am arguing for a paradigm shift in gifted education to make it more responsive to the challenges of the 21st century, as well as new opportunities for optimal development of many children and adolescents, rather than exclusively focusing on the identified and selected few (often in a once-and-for-all fashion). This argument is based on the preponderance of evidence that human potential is widely distributed in a population, and highly pluralistic and dynamic, not amenable to a uniform formula that fits everyone into a Procrustean Bed of giftedness with the assumption of its homogeneity and permanence (Dai, 2016a). I elaborate on what it takes to make such a shift in terms of four W questions: What, Why, Who, and How. I argue that by envisioning a broader agenda of gifted education, gifted education can be made more equitable and productive. At the social and organizational level, with appropriate centralized control, more locally initiated education and development efforts can be harnessed to build a distributed network system of support that is more responsive to needs for advanced learning, talent development, and excellence in the 21st century.

Abstract

Üstün yeteneklilerin eğitimi bilindiği ve uygulandığı üzere 20. yüzyılın başlarında ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu makalede 21. yüzyılın zorluklarına daha duyarlı bir üstün yetenekliler eğitimi için paradigma değişiminin gerekliliği tartışılmıştır. Paradigma değişiminin yanı sıra yalnızca seçilen ve üstün yetenek tanısı alanlara odaklanılması yerine pek çok çocuk ve ergenin en uygun gelişimi için yeni fırsatlar sunulması gerekliliği irdelenmiştir. Makaledeki argümanlar, üstün yeteneğin homojenliği ve kalıcılığı varsayımıyla herkesi bir üstün yetenek kalıbına sokan ve tek tip bir formüle dayanan değil, üstün yetenek potansiyelinin çoğulcu, dinamik ve çeşitli popülasyonlarda geniş dağılım gösterdiğini ortaya koyan kanıtlara dayanmaktadır (Dai, 2016a). Böyle bir paradigma değişikliği için neyin gerekli olduğu dört N sorusu bağlamında incelenebilir: Ne, Niçin, Kim ve Nasıl. Üstün yeteneklilerin eğitimine daha geniş bir görüş açısı ile bakılırsa, üstün yetenekliler eğitimi daha eşitlikçi ve üretken yapılabilir. Sosyal ve örgütsel düzeyde, uygun bir merkezi kontrol sistemi ile 21. yüzyılın daha ileri düzeyde öğrenme, yetenek geliştirme ve mükemmellik ihtiyaçlarına duyarlı sosyal ağ destek sistemlerinin inşa edilmesine yardımcı olabilecek daha çok yerel düzeyde eğitim çalışmaları bir araya getirilebilir.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DAI, D. Y. (2019). Toward A New Era of Gifted Education: Principles, Policies, and Strategies. Türk Üstün Zeka ve Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 2–15. https://ajindex.com/articles/327189

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Borland, J. H. (2003). The death of giftedness. In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 105-124). New York: Teachers College Press.
  2. Callahan, C. (1996). A critical self-study of gifted education: Healthy practice, necessary evil, or sedition? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 148-163.
  3. Callahan, C. M., & Miller, E. M. (2005). A child-responsive model of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 38-51).
  4. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Csermely, P. (2015, October). Cutting-edge research on talent development in Europe. Presentation at the Nuremberg Conference on Talent Development, Nuremberg, Germany. Dai, D. Y. (2010). The nature and nurture of giftedness: A new framework for understanding gifted education. New York: Teachers College Press.
  6. Dai, D. Y. (2016a). Envisioning a new century of gifted education: The case for a paradigm shift. In D. Ambrose & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Giftedness and talent in the 21st century: Adapting to the turbulence of globalization (pp. 45-63). New York: SensePublishers.
  7. Dai, D. Y. (2016b). Looking back to the future: Toward a new era of gifted education. In D. Y. Dai & C. C. Kuo (Eds.), Gifted education in Asia: Problems and prospects (pp. 295-319).
  8. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. Dai, D. Y., & Chen, F. (2013). Three paradigms of gifted education: In search of conceptual clarity in research and practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57, 151-168.
  9. Dai, D. Y., & Kuo, C. C. (Eds.). (2016). Gifted education in Asia: Problems and prospects. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. Dai, D. Y., Steenbergen-Hu, S., & Yang, Y. (2016). Gifted education in Mainland China: How it serves a national interest, and where it falls short. In D. Y. Dai & C. C. Kuo (Eds.), Gifted education in Asia: Problems and prospects (pp. 51-75).
  10. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House. Feldman, D. H. (2003). A developmental, evolutionary perspective on giftedness. In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 9-33). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University. Henry, T. S. (1920).
  11. Nineteenth Yearbook, Part II: Classroom problems in the education of gifted children. Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing Company. Lohman, D. F. (2006). Beliefs about differences between ability and accomplishment: From folk theories to cognitive science. Roeper Review, 29,