Dergiler / Selçuk Tıp Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 2

Myocardial Injury Non-Related Atherosclerotic Plaque Disruption in Patients Younger than 40 Years Old

Sayfa
116–122
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Despite the lower mortality rate of non-MICAD group, different diagnostic and treatment strategies are required for management of patients with non-MICAD.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: Myocardial infarction with coronary artery disease (MICAD) is the leading cause of myocardial injury.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:We aimed to investigate the frequency, main etiologies, and five-year mortality of patients with non-MICAD younger than 40 years.Patients and Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 292 patients with acute myocardial injury younger than 40 years between January 2010 and December 2014.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Despite the lower mortality rate of non-MICAD group, different diagnostic and treatment strategies are required for management of patients with non-MICAD.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2010 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Aim: Myocardial infarction with coronary artery disease (MICAD) is the leading cause of myocardial injury. Myocardial injury non-related to atherosclerotic plaque disruption (non-MICAD) is a rare and heterogeneous diagnosis. Although MICAD is well studied, non-MICAD was not thoroughly identified in young patient population. We aimed to investigate the frequency, main etiologies, and five-year mortality of patients with non-MICAD younger than 40 years.Patients and Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 292 patients with acute myocardial injury younger than 40 years between January 2010 and December 2014. Clinical, demographic, laboratory, angiographic features, and five-year all-cause mortality were compared between patients with non-MICAD (n=78) and MICAD (n=214).Results: Median age of patients was 36. Non-MICAD group was younger than MICAD group [32 (28-37) vs 37 (34-39)]. The frequency of female patients with non-MICAD was higher than those with MICAD (24.4% vs 10.3%). Most of the patients with MICAD presented with STEMI (77.1%), while most of the patients with non-MICAD presented with non-STEMI (89.7%). Most common etiologies of non-MICAD in were myocarditis (32%) and vasospasm (9%). Age, female sex, no smoking and, absence of dyslipidemia were independent predictors for non-MICAD. Five-year all-cause mortality in non-MICAD group was significantly lower than MICAD group (2.6% vs 10.3%) (log-rank test p=0.04).Conclusion: Non-MICAD represents a heterogeneous group of patients who had varying etiologies at different ages. Despite the lower mortality rate of non-MICAD group, different diagnostic and treatment strategies are required for management of patients with non-MICAD.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GURBUZ, A. S., TATAR, S., DUZENLİ, M. A., OZTURK, S., KİRMA, C. (2020). Myocardial Injury Non-Related Atherosclerotic Plaque Disruption in Patients Younger than 40 Years Old. Selçuk Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 2, 116–122. https://ajindex.com/articles/319013

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Bugiardini R, Manfrini O, De Ferrari GM. Unanswered questions for management of acute coronary syndrome: Risk stratification of patients with minimal disease or normal findings on coronary angiography. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1391-5
  2. Gehrie ER, Reynolds HR, Chen AY, et al. Characterization and outcomes of women and men with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and nonobstructive coronary artery disease: Results from the Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes with Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines (CRUSADE) quality improvement initiative. Am Heart J 2009;158:688-94
  3. Bugiardini R, Bairey Merz CN. Angina with “normal” coronary arteries: A changing philosophy. JAMA 2005;293:477-84
  4. Crea F, Camici PG, De Caterina A, et al. Chronic ischaemic heart disease. In: Camm AJ, Lu ̈scher TF, Serruys P, eds. The ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press 2009:657-60
  5. Larsen AI, Galbraith PD, Ghali WA, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction and angiographically normal coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 2005;95(2):261-3
  6. Nordenskjöld AM, Baron T, Eggers KM, et al. Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery (MINOCA) disease. Int J Cardiol 2018;261:18-23
  7. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2017;39:119-77
  8. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Eur Heart J 2018 Aug 25
  9. Niccoli G, Scalone G, Crea F. Acute myocardial infarction with no obstructive coronary atherosclerosis: Mechanisms and management. Eur Heart J 2015;36(8):475-81
  10. Montenegro Sá F, Ruivo C, Santos LG, et al. Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries: A single-center retrospective study. Coron Artery Dis 2018 Mar 31
  11. Pasupathy S, Air T, Dreyer RP, et al. Systematic review of patients presenting with suspected myocardial infarction and nonobstructive coronary arteries. Circulation 2015;131:861-70
  12. Raparelli V, Elharram M, Shimony A, et al. Myocardial infarction with no obstructi