Dergiler / Research on Engineering Structures and Materials / 2019 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4

Numerical evaluation of the mechanical behavior of an FPSO mooring system fairleads foundations due to maximum environmental loads

Sayfa
355–366
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results indicated that for the proposed geometry the mechanical integrity of the brackets is assured, considering that von Mises maximum stresses did not extrapolate the yielding stress limit of the steel.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The present work aimed to study the mechanical behavior of the fairlead support brackets of a FPSO (Floating, Production, Storage and Offloading) mooring system located in the Campos Basin (22°58’14’’S, 42°01’36’’O to 20°19’08’’S, 40°20’16’’O) using numerical simulation.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The stresses acting on the anchor line were applied to the centroid of the fairlead and the reactions to these, generated in the brackets, were applied in the internal region of the hole that receives the fairlead support axis.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results indicated that for the proposed geometry the mechanical integrity of the brackets is assured, considering that von Mises maximum stresses did not extrapolate the yielding stress limit of the steel.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

The present work aimed to study the mechanical behavior of the fairlead support brackets of a FPSO (Floating, Production, Storage and Offloading) mooring system located in the Campos Basin (22°58’14’’S, 42°01’36’’O to 20°19’08’’S, 40°20’16’’O) using numerical simulation. For an inextensible anchor line, the maximum stresses from the environmental loading of waves, winds and currents were determined. The stresses acting on the anchor line were applied to the centroid of the fairlead and the reactions to these, generated in the brackets, were applied in the internal region of the hole that receives the fairlead support axis. The brackets are fixed to the side of the hull by 3 vertical and 1 horizontal points. Their initial proposed geometry was based on models currently in operation on platforms P66 and P67 (Petrobras platforms capable of stocking 1.67 mi oil barrels each, with 288 m of length overall, they are designed to anchor at depth of 2200 m). The numerical simulation process was performed using the Mechanical APDL tool of ANSYS software with a computational model composed by three-dimensional (3D) finite elements. The results indicated that for the proposed geometry the mechanical integrity of the brackets is assured, considering that von Mises maximum stresses did not extrapolate the yielding stress limit of the steel.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MARTINS, K. L., PINTO, V. T., ROCHA, L. A. O., SANTOS, E. D. D., ISOLDI, L. A. (2019). Numerical evaluation of the mechanical behavior of an FPSO mooring system fairleads foundations due to maximum environmental loads. Research on Engineering Structures and Materials, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 355–366. https://ajindex.com/articles/316727

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (18)

  1. AOGHS, American Oil & Gas Historical Society. Access in: 30th March 2018.
  2. Kasper F, Barros M, Rossi R, Masetti I, Falkenberg E, Karlsen S, Waclawek I. 1997 DICASa new mooring concept for FPSO's. Offshore Technology Conference, 1997.
  3. Finucane, Mike. Details of Gryphon incident of 4th February 2011 and lessons learned. Maersk Oil
  4. Qiao D, Li B, Ou J. Comparative Analysis on Coupling Effects between an Innovative Deep Draft Platform and Different Mooring Models. Brodogradnja: Teorija i praksa brodogradnje i pomorske tehnike, 2012; 63(4), 318-328
  5. Vargas PM, Hsu TM, Lee WK. Stress concentration factors for stud-less mooring chain links in fairleads. ASME 2004 23rd International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (pp. 909-917). American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2004.
  6. Kumar KK, Srinivas PS, Rao DS. Modeling and Stress Analysis of Aerospace Bracket Using ANSYS And FRANC3D. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 1(8), 2012
  7. Gordon RB, Brown MG, Allen EM. Mooring integrity management: a state-of-the-art review. Offshore Technology Conference
  8. DNV. (2015). OS-301. Offshore Standard, Position Mooring
  9. Lacerda T. Análise de Sistemas de Ancoragem de Plataformas Flutuantes. Projeto Final de Curso. Departamento de Mecânica Aplicada e Estruturas, 2005
  10. Nazário VC. Modelagem de Sistemas de Ancoragem Utilizando Catenária Inelástica. Projeto Final de Curso–Departamento de Mecânica Aplicada e Estruturas, 2015
  11. DNV. (2010). Environmental conditions and environmental loads
  12. Bergdahl L, Kofoed JP. Simplified Design Procedures for Moorings of Wave-Energy Converters. Structural Design of Wave Energy Devices (SDWED), deliverable, v. 2, 2015
  13. Petrobras. P-66 deixa o estaleiro rumo ao campo de Lula. Access in: 31 May 2018.
  14. ANSYS, Inc. ANSYS Mechanical APDL Theory Reference. Release 15.0
  15. Burnett DS. Finite element analysis: from concepts to applications. Prentice Hall, 1987
  16. Moussa WA. Plane Stress Bracket. Ansys Tutorial. University of Alberta, 2001
  17. ANP, Agência Nacional do Petróleo, Gás Natural e Biocomb. Access in: 3th April 2018.
  18. Dean RG, Dalrymple RA. Water wave