Dergiler / Politeknik Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2

Turkey’s Energy Efficiency and Its Relative Position against OECD and BRICS Countries

Sayfa
515–525
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As a result of this study, it is given some suggestions to increase the efficiency of Turkey in the model.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The demand for energy is growing day by day, and at the same time economy is an important issue to be handled with this growing.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this respect, many countries are undertaking significant roles to decline their energy intensities (energy supply or consumption per unit of economic output) whereas this variable may be single factor for the international comparisons.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a result of this study, it is given some suggestions to increase the efficiency of Turkey in the model.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2009–2013 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Energy efficiency · data envelopment analysis · Malmquist productivity index

Özet

The demand for energy is growing day by day, and at the same time economy is an important issue to be handled with this growing. In this respect, many countries are undertaking significant roles to decline their energy intensities (energy supply or consumption per unit of economic output) whereas this variable may be single factor for the international comparisons. This study including many factors with the energy intensity measures energy efficiency of countries and positions Turkey among them. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) using multiple input and outputs is a non-parametric technique for the efficiency evaluation of a set of decision making units (DMUs). In the analyzes, the OECD and BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, Democratic People of China and South Africa) countries were used for 2009–2013 period. For this period, the Malmquist productivity index (MPI) method was also used to observe the dynamic progress of DEA analyzes. The efficiency analysis of OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) and BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) countries is conducted from 2009 to 2013. According to the results, the efficient countries are members of the OECD group and MPI of an average country worsens 1.4% over the period. As a member of OECD, Turkey is not efficient country with the score of 0.048 and Turkey’s MPI also worsens 4.5% for the whole period. Because the energy imports have become a threat to Turkey’s economy in recent years, the findings will be helpful guidance in seeing its relative position and in taking precautions. As a result of this study, it is given some suggestions to increase the efficiency of Turkey in the model.

Abstract

The demand for energy is growing day by day, and at the same time economy is an important issue to be handled with this growing. In this respect, many countries are undertaking significant roles to decline their energy intensities (energy supply or consumption per unit of economic output) whereas this variable may be single factor for the international comparisons. This study including many factors with the energy intensity measures energy efficiency of countries and positions Turkey among them. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) using multiple input and outputs is a non-parametric technique for the efficiency evaluation of a set of decision making units (DMUs). In the analyzes, the OECD and BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, Democratic People of China and South Africa) countries were used for 2009–2013 period. For this period, the Malmquist productivity index (MPI) method was also used to observe the dynamic progress of DEA analyzes. The efficiency analysis of OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) and BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) countries is conducted from 2009 to 2013. According to the results, the efficient countries are members of the OECD group and MPI of an average country worsens 1.4% over the period. As a member of OECD, Turkey is not efficient country with the score of 0.048 and Turkey’s MPI also worsens 4.5% for the whole period. Because the energy imports have become a threat to Turkey’s economy in recent years, the findings will be helpful guidance in seeing its relative position and in taking precautions. As a result of this study, it is given some suggestions to increase the efficiency of Turkey in the model.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KARIK, F., İSKENDER, Ü., KILINÇ, C. (2020). Turkey’s Energy Efficiency and Its Relative Position against OECD and BRICS Countries. Politeknik Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2, 515–525. https://ajindex.com/articles/307084

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Makridou, G., Andriosopoulos, K., Doumpos, M. and Zopounidis, C., “Measuring the efficiency of energy-intensive industries across European countries”, Energy Policy, 88: 573–583 (2016) IEA, 2015b. Available from: http://data.iea.org/ accessed: 07.07.2015. IEA, 2015a. Energy Balances of OECD Countries, 2015 edition. Sözen, A., Alp, İ. and İskender, Ü., “An Evaluation of Turkey's Energy Dependency” Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 9:4, 398–412 (2014) Republic of Turkey MENR, “Department of Nuclear Energy Project Implementation, Nuclear Power Plants and Turkey”, Publication No.2 (2015)
  2. Chang, M.-C., “Energy intensity, target level of energy intensity, and room for improvement in energy intensity: An application to the study of regions in the EU”, Energy Policy, 67: 648–655 (2014)
  3. Zhou, P., Ang, B.W. and Poh, K.L., “A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies”, European Journal of Operational Research, 189: 1–18 (2008)
  4. Hu, J.-L. and Wang, S.C., “Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China”, Energy Policy, 34: 3206–3217 (2006)
  5. Hu, J.-L. and Kao, C.H., “Efficient energy-saving targets for APEC economies”, Energy Policy, 35: 373–382 (2007)
  6. Mukherjee, K., “Energy use efficiency in U.S. manufacturing: a nonparametric analysis”, Energy Economy, 30: 76–96 (2008)
  7. Fang, H., Wu, J. and Zeng, C., “Comparative study on efficiency performance of listed coal mining companies in China and the US”, Energy Policy, 37: 5140–5148 (2009)
  8. Oggioni, G., Riccardi, R. and Toninelli, R., “Eco-efficiency of the World cement in dustry: a data envelopment analysis”, Energy Policy, 39: 2842–2854 (2011)
  9. Blomberg, J., Henriksson, E., Lundmark, R., “Energy efficiency and policy in Swedish pulp and paper mills:a data envelopment analysis approach”, Energy Policy, 42: 569–579, (2012)
  10. Sueyoshi, T. and Goto, M., “Efficiency-based rank assessment for electric power industry: a combined use of Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA) and DEA Discriminant Analysis (DA)”, Energy Economy, 34(3): 634–644 (2012)
  11. Broeren, M.L.M., Saygin, D. and Patel, M.K., “Forecasting global developments in the basic chemical industry for environmental policy analysis”, Energy Policy, 64: 273–287 (2014)
  12. Zhou, G., Chung, W. and Zhang, Y., “Measuring energy efficiency performance of China's transport sector: a data envelopment analysis approach”, Expert Syst. Appl., 41(2): 709–722 (2014)
  13. Zhang, X.-P., Cheng, X.-M., Yuan, J.-H. and Gao, X.-J., “Total-factor energy efficie