Dergiler / Politeknik Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3

Computational Analysis of Effects of Location of the Diverter Plate and Inlet Velocity on the Efficiency of Two-Phase Flow Separator

Sayfa
575–581
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Two-phase, three-dimensional (3D) and fully turbulent flow simulations reveal that the highest separation efficiency is obtained as 99% when the straight diverter plate is 200 mm far away from the top inlet and the inlet velocity is 0,25 m/s.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Two-phase horizontal gravity separators are generally used in the petroleum industry for gas and liquid separation.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Although the diverter plate is used to increase the separation speed, there is not any exact approach for specifying the appropriate location of the diverter plate on the inlet pipe.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Two-phase, three-dimensional (3D) and fully turbulent flow simulations reveal that the highest separation efficiency is obtained as 99% when the straight diverter plate is 200 mm far away from the top inlet and the inlet velocity is 0,25 m/s.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Oil gas separation · two-phase flow · horizontal separator

Özet

Two-phase horizontal gravity separators are generally used in the petroleum industry for gas and liquid separation. There are several studies in the relevant literature that reports various methods to determine the optimum diameter and length of the separator. Although the diverter plate is used to increase the separation speed, there is not any exact approach for specifying the appropriate location of the diverter plate on the inlet pipe. In the present study, the main volume of the separator is defined for a particular amount of mixture of oil and gas. Effects of the location of the diverter plate and inlet velocity on the separation efficiency are investigated for three locations of the diverter plate (100 mm, 150 mm, 200 mm) and four different inlet velocities (0,25 m/s, 0,5 m/s, 0,75 m/s, 1 m/s) by means of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method. Two-phase, three-dimensional (3D) and fully turbulent flow simulations reveal that the highest separation efficiency is obtained as 99% when the straight diverter plate is 200 mm far away from the top inlet and the inlet velocity is 0,25 m/s.

Abstract

Two-phase horizontal gravity separators are generally used in the petroleum industry for gas and liquid separation. There are several studies in the relevant literature that reports various methods to determine the optimum diameter and length of the separator. Although the diverter plate is used to increase the separation speed, there is not any exact approach for specifying the appropriate location of the diverter plate on the inlet pipe. In the present study, the main volume of the separator is defined for a particular amount of mixture of oil and gas. Effects of the location of the diverter plate and inlet velocity on the separation efficiency are investigated for three locations of the diverter plate (100 mm, 150 mm, 200 mm) and four different inlet velocities (0,25 m/s, 0,5 m/s, 0,75 m/s, 1 m/s) by means of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method. Two-phase, three-dimensional (3D) and fully turbulent flow simulations reveal that the highest separation efficiency is obtained as 99% when the straight diverter plate is 200 mm far away from the top inlet and the inlet velocity is 0,25 m/s.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YAYLA, S., KAMAL, K., BAYRAKTAR, S. (2019). Computational Analysis of Effects of Location of the Diverter Plate and Inlet Velocity on the Efficiency of Two-Phase Flow Separator. Politeknik Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3, 575–581. https://ajindex.com/articles/307059

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Pourahmadi Laleh A., Svrcek W. Y., and Monnery, W. D. ‘Design criteria for oilfield separators improved by computational fluid dynamics’, Chemical Engineering & Technology, 35: 2, 323-333, (2012)
  2. Fakhru’l-Razi A., Pendashteh A., Abdullah L. C., Biak D. R. A., Madaeni S. S., and Abidin, Z. Z., ‘Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment’, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 170: 2, 530-551, (2009)
  3. Loh W.L., Premanadhan V.K. ‘Experimental investigation of viscous oil-water flows in pipeline’, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 147: 87-97, (2016)
  4. Burlutskii E. ‘CFD study of oil-in-water two-phase flow in horizontal and vertical pipes’, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 162: 524-531, (2018)
  5. Shi J., Gourma M., Yeung H. ‘CFD simulation of horizontal oil-water flow with matched density and medium viscosity ratio in different flow regimes’, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 151: 373-383, (2017)
  6. Abdolhamid H. R., Al-Baghdadi M. A. S., and Hinshiri, A. K. E. ‘Evaluation of bio-surfactants enhancement on bioremediation process efficiency for crude oil contaminated soil at oilfield’, Strategic Study. Ovidius Univ. Ann. Chem., 20: 25-30, (2009)
  7. Song X., Yang Y., Zhang T., Xiong K., Wang Z. ‘Studies on water carrying of diesel oil in upward inclined pipes with different inclination angle’, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 157: 780-792, (2017)
  8. Zhongyia W., Changlong Y., Jia H., Yunlianga Y. ‘The analysis of internal flow field in oil-gas separator’, Procedia Engineering, 15: 4337-4341, (2011)
  9. Thi Lea T., Ich Ngoa S., Lima Y., Park C., Leeb B., Kim B., Lim D. ‘Three-phase Eulerian computational fluid dynamics of air-water–oil separator under off-shore operation’, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 171: 731-747, (2018)
  10. Jia M., Wang D., Yana C., Song J., Han Q., Chen F., Wei Y. ‘Analysis of the pressure fluctuation in the flow field of a large-scale cyclone separator’, Powder Technology, 343: 49-57, (2019)
  11. Picchi D., Strazza D., Demori M., Ferrari V., Poesio V. ‘An experimental investigation and two-fluid model validation for dilute viscous oil in water dispersed pipe flow’, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 60: 28-34, (2015)
  12. Stewart M., and Arnold K. ‘Emulsions and oil treating equipment: selection, sizing, and troubleshooting’, Gulf Professional Publishing, (2008)
  13. Pouraria H., KwanSeo J., Kee Paik J. ‘Numerical modeling of t