KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Research on Engineering Structures and Materials / 2016 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

Comparing transfer matrix method and ANFIS in free vibration analysis of Timoshenko columns with attachments

Oktay DEMİRDAĞ
Bülent YILDIRIM
Sayfa
1–18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The comparison graphs are presented in numerical analysis to show the effectiveness of the considered methods, and it is resulted that neuro-fuzzy approach may give encouraging results for these kinds of models having great number of attached masses.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, two approaches having different characteristics, one being Transfer Matrix Method (TMM) that reduces computational effort and time by reducing the dimension of the considered matrix to four for all problems and the other being The Adaptive Network based Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) used in The Fuzzy Logic Toolbox of Matlab software that again needs less computational effort and time are compared in the free vibration analysis of Timoshenko columns with attached masses having rotary inertia.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Natural frequencies for the first three modes of an elastically supported Timoshenko column with 1, 5 and 10 attached masses are computed using NFFE models, and the results are compared with the ones of TMM.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The comparison graphs are presented in numerical analysis to show the effectiveness of the considered methods, and it is resulted that neuro-fuzzy approach may give encouraging results for these kinds of models having great number of attached masses.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

In this study, two approaches having different characteristics, one being Transfer Matrix Method (TMM) that reduces computational effort and time by reducing the dimension of the considered matrix to four for all problems and the other being The Adaptive Network based Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) used in The Fuzzy Logic Toolbox of Matlab software that again needs less computational effort and time are compared in the free vibration analysis of Timoshenko columns with attached masses having rotary inertia. The governing equation of the column elements is solved by applying the separation of variables method in the TMM algorithm. The same problems are solved, also, by fuzzy-neural approach in which ANFIS model is used by establishing Neuro Fuzzy Frequency Estimation (NFFE) models. Natural frequencies for the first three modes of an elastically supported Timoshenko column with 1, 5 and 10 attached masses are computed using NFFE models, and the results are compared with the ones of TMM. The comparison graphs are presented in numerical analysis to show the effectiveness of the considered methods, and it is resulted that neuro-fuzzy approach may give encouraging results for these kinds of models having great number of attached masses.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DEMİRDAĞ, O., YILDIRIM, B. (2016). Comparing transfer matrix method and ANFIS in free vibration analysis of Timoshenko columns with attachments. Research on Engineering Structures and Materials, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 1–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/302674

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Bapat CN, Bapat C. Natural frequencies of a beam with non-classical boundary conditions and concentrated masses. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1987; 112:77- 182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(87)80102-5
  2. Karami G, Malekzadeh P, Shahpari SA. A DQEM for vibration of shear deformable nonuniforms beams with general boundary conditions. Engineering Structures, 2003; 25:1169 -1178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00065-8
  3. Lin HP, Chang SC. Free vibration analysis of multi-span beams with intermediate flexible constraints. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2005; 281:155–169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2004.01.010 Posiadala B. Free vibrations of uniform Timoshenko beams with attachments. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1997; 204:359–369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1997.0952
  4. Hurty WC, Rubinstein MF. Dynamics of Structures, Prentice Hall, India, 1964. Thomson WT. Theory of Vibration with Application, Prentice Hall, USA, 1981.
  5. Esmailzadeh E, Ohadi AR. Vibration and stability analysis of non-uniform Timoshenko beams under axial and distributed tangential loads. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2000; 236: 443 – 456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2000.2999
  6. Gokdağ H, Kopmaz O. Coupled bending and torsional vibration of a beam with in-span and tip attachments. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2005; 287:591 – 610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2004.11.019 Ozkaya E. Non-linear transverse vibrations of a simply supported beam carrying concentrated masses. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2002; 257:413 – 424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2002.5042 Demirdağ O. Free vibration analysis of elastically supported Timoshenko columns with attached masses by transfer matrix and finite element methods. Sadhana, 2008; 33:1 – 12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12046-008-0005-6
  7. Demirdag O, Catal HH. Earthquake response of semi-rigid supported single storey frames modeled as continuous system. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 2007; 25:767 – 770. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2007.25.6.767
  8. Cabrero JM, Bayo E. Development of practical design methods for steel structures with semi-rigid connections. Engineering Structures, 2005; 27:1125 – 1137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.02.017
  9. Tuma JJ, Cheng FY. Theory and Problems of Dynamic Structural Analysis: Schaum's Outline Series, McGraw-Hill, Inc. USA, 1983. Demirdağ O. Obtaining nonlinear response spectrum of semi-rigid supported frames. Ph.D. Dissertation, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey, 2005. Low KH