KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

Elimination by Gamification the 5th Grade Students’ Misconceptions about the Matter and Phase Change

Gökhan ÇALGICI
Mehtap YILDIRIM
Mehmet Kürşad DURU
Sayfa
1278–1310
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

After the course, which was carried out using gamification components, it was determined that the students did not confuse the phase changes and could differentiate between the concepts of steam and smoke.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:While the purpose of this study is to reveal misconceptions about the Phase Change of Matter in the fifth grade Matter and Its Nature unit at the same time to overcome these misconceptions with gamified education.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This form was applied as a pre-and post-test to 20 students who are fifth grade students in the 2019-2020 academic year.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:After the course, which was carried out using gamification components, it was determined that the students did not confuse the phase changes and could differentiate between the concepts of steam and smoke.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2019-2020 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

While the purpose of this study is to reveal misconceptions about the Phase Change of Matter in the fifth grade Matter and Its Nature unit at the same time to overcome these misconceptions with gamified education. In accordance with these purposes, the "The Form of Misconceptions about Matter and Phase Change" consisting of four open-ended questions that was developed and implemented. This form was applied as a pre-and post-test to 20 students who are fifth grade students in the 2019-2020 academic year. While the instruction was carried out within the current teaching plan, the gamification components were added to the course and the intruction was performed. At the end of the study, it was determined that the students had difficulty in distinguishing the concepts of evaporation and boiling, and they used the concept of smoke instead of vapor. After the course, which was carried out using gamification components, it was determined that the students did not confuse the phase changes and could differentiate between the concepts of steam and smoke.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇALGICI, G., YILDIRIM, M., DURU, M. K. (2020). Elimination by Gamification the 5th Grade Students’ Misconceptions about the Matter and Phase Change. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 1278–1310. https://ajindex.com/articles/289758

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Abraham, M.R., Gryzybowski, E.B., Renner, J.W. & Marek, A.E. (1992). Understanding and Misunderstanding of eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, (105-120).
  2. Ar, N. A. (2016). The effects of gamification on academic achievement and learning strategies usage of vocational high school students (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Sakarya Üniversitesi, Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi, Sakarya. Armier Jr, D. D., Shepherd, C. E. & Skrabut, S. (2016). Using game elements to increase engagement in course assignments. College Teaching, 1-9.
  3. Bell, K. R. (2014). Online 3.0-The rise of the gamer educator the potential role of gamification in online education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania, USA. Buckley, P. & Doyle, E. (2016). Gamification and student motivation. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1162-1175.
  4. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. 20. Baskı, Ankara:
  5. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. Bryner, J. (2007). Most students bored at school. Retrieved from https://www.livescience.com/1308-students-bored-school.html
  6. Coştu, B., Ayas, A. & Ünal, S. (2007). Kavram yanılgıları ve olası nedenleri: kaynama kavramı Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 15(1), 123-136.
  7. Çalık, M. & Ayas, A. (2004). Farklı öğrenim seviyesindeki öğrencilerin çözünme hakkındaki anlamaları: Olay odaklı bir karşılaştırma. Hasan Âli Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1, 61-81.
  8. Çepni, S. (2007). Araştırma ve Proje Çalışmalarına Giriş. Trabzon: Celepler Matbaacılık.alar/makale/acarindex-1423935457.pdf. Duman, M, Avcı, G. (2016). Sekizinci Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Maddenin Halleri Ve Isı Ünitesine Yönelik Kavram Yanılgıları. Uşak Üniversitesi Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2 (3), 129-165. DOI: 10.29065/usakead.256383 Demircioğlu, H. (2003). Sınıf öğretmen adaylarının kimya kavramlarını anlama düzeyleri ve karşılaşılan yanılgılar. Yüksek lisans tezi, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon. Eryılmaz, A., Tatlı, A., (1999). ODTÜ Öğrencilerinin Mekanik Konusundaki Kavram Yanılgıları. III. Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi Sempozyumunda sunulmuş bildiri, 23-25 Ekim 1999,
  9. Trabzon. Güneş, T., Dilek, N. Ş., Demir, E.S., Hoplan, M. ve Çelikoğlu, M. (2010). Öğretmenlerin kavram öğretimi, kavram yanılgılarını saptama ve giderme çalışmaları üzerine nit