Dergiler / EurAsian Journal of BioSciences (elektronik) / 2014 / Sayı: 8

In silico characterization and comparative analysis of Bacillus subtilis GntR type LutR transcription factor

Sayfa
12–28
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Here, weprovide a detailed description of the similarities and differences between B. subtilis LutR and boththe other LutR proteins from different bacterial species and other HTH-type transcriptional factors.Conclusions: These results provide a scientific groundworkbase and can be used for advanced insilico analysis, homology modelling, and in vitro studies, including DNA-protein interaction analysis,such as ChIP and EMSA methods.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background: The GntR-type transcriptional factor LutR (formerly YvfI) behaves as a transition stateregulator, governing adaptations of Bacillus subtilis cells to the transition from exponential growthto stationary phase.Material and Methods: In this study, we evaluated a total of 30 LutR proteins from differentbacterial species that were available in the NCBI database.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:By performing the physicochemicalanalyses, domain analysis, and phylogenetic tree construction, we identified some similarities anddifferences among these 30 LutR proteins.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Here, weprovide a detailed description of the similarities and differences between B. subtilis LutR and boththe other LutR proteins from different bacterial species and other HTH-type transcriptional factors.Conclusions: These results provide a scientific groundworkbase and can be used for advanced insilico analysis, homology modelling, and in vitro studies, including DNA-protein interaction analysis,such as ChIP and EMSA methods.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Background: The GntR-type transcriptional factor LutR (formerly YvfI) behaves as a transition stateregulator, governing adaptations of Bacillus subtilis cells to the transition from exponential growthto stationary phase.Material and Methods: In this study, we evaluated a total of 30 LutR proteins from differentbacterial species that were available in the NCBI database. By performing the physicochemicalanalyses, domain analysis, and phylogenetic tree construction, we identified some similarities anddifferences among these 30 LutR proteins. Furthermore, only the primer structure of Bacillus subtilis168 LutR was compared with the sequences and 3D conformational situations of the well-knownHTH-type transcriptional factors FadR (PDB ID: 1HW1, 1HW2, 1HT9) and YvoA (PDB ID: 2WV0) usingPyMOL.Results: These analyses revealed that the critical residues for DNA-recognition and DNA-binding ofLutR are highly conserved and conformationally correspond to the same positions as those in FadRand YvoA. The sequence (15-SVQALAESF-23) of the second helix in LutR seems to be important forDNA-binding, while the Q17-R27-Q47 residues might be critical for DNA recognition. Here, weprovide a detailed description of the similarities and differences between B. subtilis LutR and boththe other LutR proteins from different bacterial species and other HTH-type transcriptional factors.Conclusions: These results provide a scientific groundworkbase and can be used for advanced insilico analysis, homology modelling, and in vitro studies, including DNA-protein interaction analysis,such as ChIP and EMSA methods.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AVCI, M. K., YAMANER, Ç., AYVAZ, M., KARATAŞ, A. (2014). In silico characterization and comparative analysis of Bacillus subtilis GntR type LutR transcription factor. EurAsian Journal of BioSciences (elektronik), Sayı: 8, 12–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/284949

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Adeloye AO, Ajibade PA (2011) high molar extinction coefficient mono anthracenyl bipyridyl heteroleptic ruthenium(|l) complex: synthesis, photophysical and electrochemical properties. Molecules 16(6): 4615-4631. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules16064615 Anonymous (2014a) Protein database. National Center for Biotechnology Information, United States National Library of Medicine, Bethesda. http://www.ncbi.n|m.nih.gov/protein Anonymous (2014b) Protein data bank. Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, Piscataway. http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/home/home.do Anonymous (2014c)
  2. CIustaIW, Multiple sequence alignment program. The EMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute, Cambridge. http://www2.ebi.ac.uk/c|usta|w
  3. Artimo P, Jonnalagedda M, Arnold K, Baratin D, Csardi G, de Castro E, Duvaud S, FIegeI V, Fortier A, Gasteiger E, Grosdidier A, Hernandez C, loannidis V, Kuznetsov D, Liechti R, Moretti S, Mostaguir K, Redaschi N, Rossier G, Xenarios I, Stockinger (2012) ExPASy: SIB bioinformatics resource portal. Nucleic Acids Research 40(W1): W597- W603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks400
  4. Babu MM, Teichmann SA (2003) Evolution of transcription factors and the gene regulatory network in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Research 31(4): 1234-1244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg210
  5. Bai L, Qi X, Zhang Y, Yao C, Guo L,Jiang R, Zhang R, Li (2013) new GntR family regulator Ste1 in Streptomyces sp. 139. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 97: 8673-8682. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/500253-013--5076-6
  6. Bailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA, Frith M, Grant CE, Clementi L, Ren J, Li WW, Noble WS (2009) MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Research 37: 202-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp335
  7. Bertrand KP, Postle K, Wray LVJ, Reznikoff WS (1983) Overlapping divergent promoters control expression of Tn10 tetracycline resistance. Gene 23(2): 149-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378--1119(83)90046-X
  8. Brand LH, Fischer NM, Harter K, Kohlbacher O, Wanke (2013) Elucidating the evolutionary conserved DNA-binding specificities of WRKY transcription factors by molecular dynamics and in vitro binding assays. Nucleic Acids Research 41 (21 ): 9764-9778. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt732
  9. Brennan RG (1991) Interactions of the helix--turn--helix binding domain. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 1: 80-88. http:/ldx.doi.org/10.1016/0959-440X(91)90015-L Brennan RG (1992) DNA recognition by the helix-turn-helix motif. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2(1): 10