As a result of the calculations, it was seen that the calculated values for the energy and strength of-the GTR are sufficiently in agreement with the experimental ones.
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, based on Pyatov-Salamov method, the properties of the Gamow-Teller(GT) $1^+$ states in 90 Nb have been investigated and the agreement of our results calculated by this method for the energy of Gamow-Teller Resonance (GTR) and the corresponding strengths of the $1^+$ excitations in $^{90}Nb$ with the experimental values has been tested.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, based on Pyatov-Salamov method, the properties of the Gamow-Teller(GT) $1^+$ states in 90 Nb have been investigated and the agreement of our results calculated by this method for the energy of Gamow-Teller Resonance (GTR) and the corresponding strengths of the $1^+$ excitations in $^{90}Nb$ with the experimental values has been tested.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a result of the calculations, it was seen that the calculated values for the energy and strength of-the GTR are sufficiently in agreement with the experimental ones.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri
Abstract
In this study, based on Pyatov-Salamov method, the properties of the Gamow-Teller(GT) $1^+$ states in 90 Nb have been investigated and the agreement of our results calculated by this method for the energy of Gamow-Teller Resonance (GTR) and the corresponding strengths of the $1^+$ excitations in $^{90}Nb$ with the experimental values has been tested. As a result of the calculations, it was seen that the calculated values for the energy and strength of-the GTR are sufficiently in agreement with the experimental ones.
🔖
Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap
BABACAN, T., SALAMOV, D. I., KÜÇÜKBURSA, A. (2005). An investigation of the Gamow-Teller $1^+$ states in $^{90}Nb$ isotopes. Mathematical and Computational Applications, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 359–368. https://ajindex.com/articles/280066
K. Ikeda, S. Fujii and J. I. Fujita, Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 271, 1963. 2.J. I. Fujita and K. Ikeda, Nucl. Phys. 67, 145, 1965. 3.C. Gaarde and T. Kammuri, Nucl. Phys. A215, 314, 1973. 4.W. R. Wharton and P. D. Debevec, Phys. Lett. 5IB, 447, 1974
Phys.Rev.C 11, 1963, 1975. 5.A. Galonsky et al., Phys. Rev. C 14, 748, 1976. 6.R. R. Doering, A Galonsky, D. M. Patterson and G. F. Bertsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35,1961, 1975. 7.D. E. Baunium et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 175, 1980. 8.C. D. Goodman, C. A. Goulding, M. B. Gereenfield, J. Rapaport, D. E. Baunium, C.C. Foster, W. G. Love, and F. Petrovich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1755, 1980. 9.T. N. Taddeucci et al., Nucl. Phys. A 469, 125, 1987. 10.C. Gaarde, Nucl. Phys. A 507, 79c, 1990. 11.C. Gaarde et al, Nucl. Phys. A369, 258, 1981. 12.T. Wakasa et al., Phys. Rev. C 55, 2909, 1997. 13.T. N. Taddeucci et al., Phys. Rev. C 33, 746, 1986. 14.D. J. Horen et al., Phys. Lett 95B, 27, 1980
Phys. Lett. 99B, 383, 1981. 15.B. D. Anderson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 45, 699, 1980. 16.M. Fujiwara et al., Nucl. Phys. A599, 223c, 1996
Nucl. Phys. A577, 43c, 1994. 17.J. Janecke et al, Nucl. Phys. A526, 1, 1991. 18.A. Brockstedt et. al, Nucl. Phys. A530, 571, 1991. 19.H. Akimune et al., Nucl. Phys. A569, 245c, 1994. 20.A. Krasznahorkay et al., Phys. Rev. C 64, 067302, 2001. 21.N. Anantaraman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2375, 1986. 22.J. S. Wienfield et al., Phys. Rev. C 35, 1734, 1987. 23.H. Wirth et al., Phys. Rev. C 41, 2698, 1990. 24.M. Moosburger et al., Phys. Rev. C 41, 2925, 1990. 25.E. Aschenauer et al., Phys. Rev. C 44, 2771, 1991. 26.H. Laurent et al., Nucl. Phys. A569, 297c, 1991. 27.J. Janecke et al., Nucl. Phys. A687, 270c, 2001. 28.M. I. Baznat,N. I. Pyatov, D. I. Salamov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 25(6), 13, 1977. 29.F. A. Gareev, S. N. Ershov, N. I. Pyatov, S. A. Fayans, D. I. Salamov, Sov. J. Nucl.Phys. 33(3), 337, 1981. 30.A. A. Kuliev, D. I. Salamov, A. Küçükbursa, Mathematical and Computational Applications 6, 103,2001. 31.C. Selam, A. Küçükbursa, A. A. Kuliev, E. Guliev, in Proceedings of International Syposium on Nuclei and Nucleons, Darmstadt, Germany, 2000. 32.A. A. Kuliev et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 9, 249, 2000. 33.E. Guliev, A. A. Kuliev, P. Von Neuman-Cosel, Nucl. Phys. A 690, 255, 2001. 34.E. Guliev, A. A. Kuliev, P. Von Neuman-Cosel, A. Richter, Phys. Lett. B 532, 173, 2002. 35.N. I. Pyatov et al., Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 29(1), 10, 1979. 36.N. I. Pyatov, D. I. Salamov, S. A. Fayans, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 34(3), 335, 19