SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Mathematical and Computational Applications / 2005 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3

An investigation of the Gamow-Teller $1^+$ states in $^{90}Nb$ isotopes

TAHSİN BABACAN
Djavad I. SALAMOV
ATALAY KÜÇÜKBURSA
Pages
359–368
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the calculations, it was seen that the calculated values for the energy and strength of-the GTR are sufficiently in agreement with the experimental ones.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, based on Pyatov-Salamov method, the properties of the Gamow-Teller(GT) $1^+$ states in 90 Nb have been investigated and the agreement of our results calculated by this method for the energy of Gamow-Teller Resonance (GTR) and the corresponding strengths of the $1^+$ excitations in $^{90}Nb$ with the experimental values has been tested.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, based on Pyatov-Salamov method, the properties of the Gamow-Teller(GT) $1^+$ states in 90 Nb have been investigated and the agreement of our results calculated by this method for the energy of Gamow-Teller Resonance (GTR) and the corresponding strengths of the $1^+$ excitations in $^{90}Nb$ with the experimental values has been tested.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the calculations, it was seen that the calculated values for the energy and strength of-the GTR are sufficiently in agreement with the experimental ones.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, based on Pyatov-Salamov method, the properties of the Gamow-Teller(GT) $1^+$ states in 90 Nb have been investigated and the agreement of our results calculated by this method for the energy of Gamow-Teller Resonance (GTR) and the corresponding strengths of the $1^+$ excitations in $^{90}Nb$ with the experimental values has been tested. As a result of the calculations, it was seen that the calculated values for the energy and strength of-the GTR are sufficiently in agreement with the experimental ones.

🔖

Cite This Article

BABACAN, T., SALAMOV, D. I., KÜÇÜKBURSA, A. (2005). An investigation of the Gamow-Teller $1^+$ states in $^{90}Nb$ isotopes. Mathematical and Computational Applications, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 359–368. https://ajindex.com/articles/280066

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. K. Ikeda, S. Fujii and J. I. Fujita, Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 271, 1963. 2.J. I. Fujita and K. Ikeda, Nucl. Phys. 67, 145, 1965. 3.C. Gaarde and T. Kammuri, Nucl. Phys. A215, 314, 1973. 4.W. R. Wharton and P. D. Debevec, Phys. Lett. 5IB, 447, 1974
  2. Phys.Rev.C 11, 1963, 1975. 5.A. Galonsky et al., Phys. Rev. C 14, 748, 1976. 6.R. R. Doering, A Galonsky, D. M. Patterson and G. F. Bertsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35,1961, 1975. 7.D. E. Baunium et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 175, 1980. 8.C. D. Goodman, C. A. Goulding, M. B. Gereenfield, J. Rapaport, D. E. Baunium, C.C. Foster, W. G. Love, and F. Petrovich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1755, 1980. 9.T. N. Taddeucci et al., Nucl. Phys. A 469, 125, 1987. 10.C. Gaarde, Nucl. Phys. A 507, 79c, 1990. 11.C. Gaarde et al, Nucl. Phys. A369, 258, 1981. 12.T. Wakasa et al., Phys. Rev. C 55, 2909, 1997. 13.T. N. Taddeucci et al., Phys. Rev. C 33, 746, 1986. 14.D. J. Horen et al., Phys. Lett 95B, 27, 1980
  3. Phys. Lett. 99B, 383, 1981. 15.B. D. Anderson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 45, 699, 1980. 16.M. Fujiwara et al., Nucl. Phys. A599, 223c, 1996
  4. Nucl. Phys. A577, 43c, 1994. 17.J. Janecke et al, Nucl. Phys. A526, 1, 1991. 18.A. Brockstedt et. al, Nucl. Phys. A530, 571, 1991. 19.H. Akimune et al., Nucl. Phys. A569, 245c, 1994. 20.A. Krasznahorkay et al., Phys. Rev. C 64, 067302, 2001. 21.N. Anantaraman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2375, 1986. 22.J. S. Wienfield et al., Phys. Rev. C 35, 1734, 1987. 23.H. Wirth et al., Phys. Rev. C 41, 2698, 1990. 24.M. Moosburger et al., Phys. Rev. C 41, 2925, 1990. 25.E. Aschenauer et al., Phys. Rev. C 44, 2771, 1991. 26.H. Laurent et al., Nucl. Phys. A569, 297c, 1991. 27.J. Janecke et al., Nucl. Phys. A687, 270c, 2001. 28.M. I. Baznat,N. I. Pyatov, D. I. Salamov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 25(6), 13, 1977. 29.F. A. Gareev, S. N. Ershov, N. I. Pyatov, S. A. Fayans, D. I. Salamov, Sov. J. Nucl.Phys. 33(3), 337, 1981. 30.A. A. Kuliev, D. I. Salamov, A. Küçükbursa, Mathematical and Computational Applications 6, 103,2001. 31.C. Selam, A. Küçükbursa, A. A. Kuliev, E. Guliev, in Proceedings of International Syposium on Nuclei and Nucleons, Darmstadt, Germany, 2000. 32.A. A. Kuliev et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 9, 249, 2000. 33.E. Guliev, A. A. Kuliev, P. Von Neuman-Cosel, Nucl. Phys. A 690, 255, 2001. 34.E. Guliev, A. A. Kuliev, P. Von Neuman-Cosel, A. Richter, Phys. Lett. B 532, 173, 2002. 35.N. I. Pyatov et al., Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 29(1), 10, 1979. 36.N. I. Pyatov, D. I. Salamov, S. A. Fayans, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 34(3), 335, 19