KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Meme Sağlığı Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Meme kanseri tarama yöntemleri

Ümit BAYOL
Vahit ÖZMEN
Murat TUNCER
Ercüment TARCAN
Pınar AYDIN
Mehmet UHRİ
Figen DEMİRKAZIK
Caner FİDANER
Ayfer HAYDAROĞLU
Sayfa
109–111
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BAYOL, Ü., ÖZMEN, V., TUNCER, M., TARCAN, E., AYDIN, P., UHRİ, M., DEMİRKAZIK, F., FİDANER, C., HAYDAROĞLU, A. (2007). Meme kanseri tarama yöntemleri. Meme Sağlığı Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 109–111. https://ajindex.com/articles/278311

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Olivotto IA, Bancej C, Goel V, Snider J, McAuley RG, Irvine B, Kan L, Mirsky J, Sabine MJ, McGilly R, Caines: Waiting times from abnormal breast screen to diagnosis in 7 Canadian provinces. CMAJ, Aug. 7, 2001; 165-183
  2. Steering Committee on Clinical practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: 2. Investigation of lesions detected by mammography. CMAJ, 1998;158: 3-8
  3. Jonsson H, Nystrom L, Tornberg S et al: Service screenign with mammography of women aged 50-69 years in Sweden. J Med Screen, 2001; 8: 152-160
  4. Zackrisson S, Andersson I, Janson L, Manjer J, Garne JP: Rate of overdiagnosis of breast cancer 15 years after end of Malmö mammographic screening trial: follow-up study. BMJ, 332;689-692, 2006 (Kanıt değeri IB
  5. Teh W, Wilson ARM: The role of ultrasonography in breast cancer screenign. A consensus statement by the European Group for Breast Cancer Screenign. Eur J Cancer, 34(4);449-450, 1998
  6. Karesen R, Jensen HH, Sauer T, Schlichting E, Skaane P, Wang H: Logistic of referral, diagnostic assessment and treatment of patients with breast symptoms and signs. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery, 2002; 91:232-238
  7. Wald NJ, Chamberlain J, Hackshaw A: European Society of Mastology Consensus Conference on breast cancer screening: report of the evaluation committe. Br J Radiol,1994; 67: 925-933 (Kanıt değeri IA
  8. Cody HS III: Current surgical management of breast cancer. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2002; 14: 45-52
  9. Houssamı N, Ciatto S, Irwig L, Simpson JM, Macaskill P: The comparative sensitivity of mammography and ultrasound in women with breast symptoms: an age-specific analysis. The Breast, 2002; 11:125-130
  10. Warner E, Plewes DB, Shumak RS, Catzavelos GC,Di Prospero LS, Yaff e MJ, Goel V, Ramsay E, Chart PL, Cole DEC, Taylor GA, Cutrara M, Samuels TH, Murphy JP, Murphy JM, Narod SA: Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasonography for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol,2001; 19:3524-3531
  11. Hartman A-R, Daniel BL, Kurian AW, Mills MA, Nowels KW, Dirbas FM, Kingham KE, Chun NM, Herfkens RJ, Ford JM, Plevritis SK: Breast magnetic resonance image screening and ductal lavage in women at high genetic risk for breast carcinoma. Cancer, 2004: 100; 479-489
  12. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ: American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of