KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Medicine Science / 2017 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

Clinical and radiological results of radial shortening osteotomy, and proximal row carpectomy in Kienböck’s Disease

Engin Eren DESTELİ
Ahmet Serhat GENC
Yunus İMREN
Süleyman Semih DEDEOĞLU
Sayfa
526–530
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

We consider that experience and technical familiarity of the surgeon is key factor to decide the type of the procedure to be performed

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this prospective study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of our patients treated with radial shortening osteotomy (RSO) and proximal row carpectomy (PRC) together with a short review of the literature.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study included 35 patients with the diagnosis of Kienbock disease RSO was performed for 17 patients and 18 patients underwent PRC. 15 of the patients had Lichtman Stage 2, 14 patients had Stage 3A and 6 patients had Stage 3B disease.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:We consider that experience and technical familiarity of the surgeon is key factor to decide the type of the procedure to be performed
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

In this prospective study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of our patients treated with radial shortening osteotomy (RSO) and proximal row carpectomy (PRC) together with a short review of the literature. The study included 35 patients with the diagnosis of Kienbock disease RSO was performed for 17 patients and 18 patients underwent PRC. 15 of the patients had Lichtman Stage 2, 14 patients had Stage 3A and 6 patients had Stage 3B disease. Q-DASH Score, Preoperative and postoperative carpal height ratio (CHR), revised CHR, stahl index, radial inclination values were noted. Preoperative and postoperative flexion-extension range of Motion (ROM) and ulnar deviation angles were also obtained. Nakamura’s clinical evaluation system was performed to each patient. Results of clinical evaluation revealed significant progression at postoperative sixth month follow-up. Our results showed clinical improvement following surgeries of both RSO and PRC for Lichtman Stage 2, 3a and 3b disease. We consider that experience and technical familiarity of the surgeon is key factor to decide the type of the procedure to be performed

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DESTELİ, E. E., GENC, A. S., İMREN, Y., DEDEOĞLU, S. S. (2017). Clinical and radiological results of radial shortening osteotomy, and proximal row carpectomy in Kienböck’s Disease. Medicine Science, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 526–530. https://ajindex.com/articles/277461

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Altay T, Baş M, Karapınar L, Öztürk H, Us M R. Radialshortening in Kienböck’s disease. Eklem HastalikCerrahisi. 2002;13:15-22
  2. Axelsson R. Nıveau operations in necrosis of the lunate bone. Handchirurgie.1973;5(4):187-96
  3. Matsui Y, Funakoshi T, Motomiya M, Urita A, Minami M, İwasaki N. Radial shortening osteotomy for Kienbock disease: Minimum 10-year follow-up. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;39(4):679-85
  4. Trumble T, Glisson RR, Seaber AV,Urbaniak JR. A biomechanical comparison of the methods for treating Kienböck’s disease. J Hand Surg Am.1986;11(1):88-93
  5. Crabbe W A. Excision of the proximal row of the carpus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1964;1:708-11
  6. Croog AS, Stern PJ Proximal row carpectomy in advanced Kienbock’s disease: average 10 years follow-up J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33(7):1122-30
  7. Lecomte F, Wavreille G, Limousin M, Strouk G, Fontaine C, Chantelot C. Proximal row carpectomy 25 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007;93(5):444-54
  8. Bellemere P, Maes-Clavier C, Loubersac T, Gaisne E, Kerjean Y, Collon S. Pyrocarbon interposition wrist arthroplasty in the tyreatment of failed wrist procedures. J wrist Surg. 2012;1(1):31-8
  9. Lichtman DM, Alexander AH, Mack GR, Gunther SF. Kienböck’s disease: update on silicone replacement arthroplasty. J Hand Surg. 1982;7(4):343-7
  10. Lichtman DM, Mack GR, MacDonald RI, Gunther SF, Wilson JN. Kienböck’s disease: the role of silicone replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59(7):899-908
  11. Divelbiss B, Baratz M. The role of arthroplasty and arthrodesis following trauma to the upper extremity. Hand Clin. 1999;15(2):335-45
  12. Takase K, Imakiire A. Lunate excision, capitate osteotomy, and intercarpal arthrodesis for advanced Kienbock disease. Long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83(2):177-83
  13. Wyrick JD. Proximal row carpectomy and intercarpal arthrodesis for the management of wrist arthritis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003;11(4):277-81
  14. Condit DP, Idler RS, Fischer TJ, Hastings H 2nd.Preoperative factors and outcome after lunate decompression for Kienböck’s disease.J Hand Surg Am. 1993;18(4):691-6
  15. Tamai S, Yajima H, Ono H. Revascularization procedures in the treatment of Kienbock’s disease. Hand Clin. 1993;9(3):455-66
  16. Hulten O. Ober anatomische Variationen des Handgelenkknochen. Acta Radiol. 1928;9:155-68
  17. Chung KC, Spilson SV, Kim HM. Is negative ulnar variance a risk factor for Kienböck’s disease? A meta-analysis. Ann Plastic Surg. 2001;47(5):494-9